I really couldn't be bothered to read that last post.
No? There's a wealth of information there, if you know where to look!
I really couldn't be bothered to read that last post.
Your all wrong , the reason why most traders fail ( don't know if it's 90% but it's gonna be quite high) is apart from perhaps long term buy and hold as an investment , trading is a zero sum game , by that less money comes back to traders as a whole, than goes in , IF ALL TRADERS DID ALL THE THINGS MENTIONED IN PREVIOUSE ANSWERS AND BECAME FANTASTIC TRADERS , MOST WOULD STILL LOSE , BECUASE WE'RE TRADING AGAINST EACH OTHER AND PRODUCING LESS PROFITS THAN ARE PUT IN TO MARKETS AS A WHOLE . the ratio of people winning to losing may vary from time to time or market to market , but a few will make nearly all the money , being more heavily represented in the markets than thier numbers would merit becuase previouse success tends to give them access to greater trading capitol . Most lose through simple mathematics , becuase of commissions less money comes out than goes in, and as winning traders have most money , they need lots of losers ( often smaller traders in terms of maney) to feed these profits .If you'd ask why an individual trader tends not to be in the winning 10%, despite the obviouse simple 1 in 10 chance , then thats a more complicated question , but remember there's a good chance 9 out of 10 of these replies are from traders who arn't profitable.
it was you who suggested trading fx "ensures a profit ", i was merely being sarcastic, though I now see you've changed your idiotic post, you edited your post not becuase of spelling , but because your cheap.
Any zero sum activity is based on the view that if someone has more than they started with then someone else or several others engaged in the same activity must have either a liability or a loss. This does not apply to buying and selling of stocks as you can buy at one price and sell at a profit without that sale incurring a new liability or loss to those who have become the new owners.
Paul
Your all wrong , the reason why most traders fail ( don't know if it's 90% but it's gonna be quite high) is apart from perhaps long term buy and hold as an investment , trading is a zero sum game , by that less money comes back to traders as a whole, than goes in , IF ALL TRADERS DID ALL THE THINGS MENTIONED IN PREVIOUSE ANSWERS AND BECAME FANTASTIC TRADERS , MOST WOULD STILL LOSE , BECUASE WE'RE TRADING AGAINST EACH OTHER AND PRODUCING LESS PROFITS THAN ARE PUT IN TO MARKETS AS A WHOLE . the ratio of people winning to losing may vary from time to time or market to market , but a few will make nearly all the money , being more heavily represented in the markets than thier numbers would merit becuase previouse success tends to give them access to greater trading capitol . Most lose through simple mathematics , becuase of commissions less money comes out than goes in, and as winning traders have most money , they need lots of losers ( often smaller traders in terms of maney) to feed these profits .If you'd ask why an individual trader tends not to be in the winning 10%, despite the obviouse simple 1 in 10 chance , then thats a more complicated question , but remember there's a good chance 9 out of 10 of these replies are from traders who arn't profitable.
That is a terrible description of Zero Sum. In a derivative market like Futures it is best to think of money in the same way as the conservation of energy, ie/ Energy cannot be created or destroyed it can only be changed from one form to another. In the same way, money cannot be created or destroyed; it only changes from one hand to another.
Imagine 10 participants in a game of poker each with an equal $100. The total sum of money in the game is $1000. Imagine at the end of the game, 1 person has won everybody else’s money. This means that 1 person has $1000 and 9 people have $0 but the total sum is still $1000-
Sum= 9x(+$US100)to the winner + 9x(-$100) from the losers
Sum= $0 (Zero Sum)
Now think of a poker game in which there are 10 players but nobody knows how much money each player has. Imagine 9 players only have $10 and 1 player has $100,000.Who is most likely going to win all of the money by the end of the day?
I have been doing a lot of research on Trading before taking the 'leap', and I have read this at so many places that "90% of traders FAIL". I have no idea about trading but I have never 'failed' at anything I have done so far, so howcome, trading can be so difficult???? Why is it so 'impossible' to achieve success at trading? I presume there is a process in place, a research, a strategy to do trading OR is it all LUCK? If it is all luck and nothing is in your hands, then ya, why won't 90% fail. Any coments would be most welcome. Thanks
The actual point is indeed NOT true!
You MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT every possible scenarios and REAL WORLD true volume and prices AND THE MONIES taken out of OR the losses into the market ( INCLUSIVE of the SPREAD TRADERS' BETS/ TRADE POSITIONS as well ).
Why? 'Cos some spread trade companies do not do any hedging and they do not compensate ( for shares futures - in terms of the dividends paid ) for adjustments - so that is why THEIR version of the DOW or FTSE and even other commocities prices like pork bellies are different! They just want the money! Like online gambling dens, the longer you stay with them the worse off you become 'cos the HOUSE has the EDGE over you - the gambler!
Recall that it can NEVER BE A ZERO SUM as you must know that INFLATION has hit sky high - either the FED/ CENTRAL BANK of ENGLAND raise the interest rate to hold it at bay or else the cost of electricity will basically cost a BOMB soon! As I speak, I am already spending a lot for my ONLINE activities - my web cam consumes power, my TV ( for my fundamental analysis ), my ........... etc, etc!
Not to mention the opportunity cost that should I get more out of a DAY JOB, I should quit the market completely????!!!! Of course, there are INDEED more ( 90-95% ) than those who profit out of the market! You must know that while the HUMAN BODY does nothing, IT ALSO CONSUMES ENERGY AS IT BREATHES! EVEN WHEN IT SLEEPS, IT CONSUMES A HIGH AMOUNT OF ENERGY to make repairs to the body and NOT TO MENTION the dreams ( recall the matrix? ) which when plugged into the dream world - energy is used to produce brain waves!
In this world, there is always a certain pattern and also the necessary ratio! So, sometimes, you get 90%, sometimes 91% or sometimes even 95%! Not everybody is a sure winner! Unless, you get a VERY GOOD and automated trading software ( which I am undertaking as a project now ). That will raise the percentage point by a little - just enough to push oneslef towards the 10 %!
Yours
S K
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi there
Be one with GOD, so that HE may appoint a deliver for your Soul! -HariHaraBramKalki ( S K )
Yahoo! 360° - S K's Profile
I would like to try and answer this simply.
I agree with the 90% number however many may not, but the simple answer is because trading is 90% emotional and 10 percent knowledge..
So with trading you have to calculate how much you want to risk for how much you want to reward. And thats part of your trading plan, and the most important.
Read This...
A New Trader's Journey to Success
by James Okada Lee
Trading is 30% mechanical and 170% psychological. 200% is required to become a successful trader. Good luck and best of trading.
Any zero sum activity is based on the view that if someone has more than they started with then someone else or several others engaged in the same activity must have either a liability or a loss. This does not apply to buying and selling of stocks as you can buy at one price and sell at a profit without that sale incurring a new liability or loss to those who have become the new owners.
Paul
That is a terrible description of Zero Sum. In a derivative market like Futures it is best to think of money in the same way as the conservation of energy, ie/ Energy cannot be created or destroyed it can only be changed from one form to another. In the same way, money cannot be created or destroyed; it only changes from one hand to another.
Imagine 10 participants in a game of poker each with an equal $100. The total sum of money in the game is $1000. Imagine at the end of the game, 1 person has won everybody else’s money. This means that 1 person has $1000 and 9 people have $0 but the total sum is still $1000-
Sum= 9x(+$US100)to the winner + 9x(-$100) from the losers
Sum= $0 (Zero Sum)
Now think of a poker game in which there are 10 players but nobody knows how much money each player has. Imagine 9 players only have $10 and 1 player has $100,000.Who is most likely going to win all of the money by the end of the day?