The use of the "sword" happens only in two situations - defense and where Muslims are not allowed to spread the word of islam (i know someone will comment on this).
Where muslims were allowed to spread the word of islam there was no need for the "sword". In fact, many areas accepted Islam only through interaction with Muslim merchants. No "swords" used
But let's look at the use of the swords in Islam as compared to the crusades:
In islam warriors were not allowed to kill anyone that was not a fighter (old men, women, children, etc.). They were not even allowed to cut a tree. The wars usually led to very few fatalities.
A description I recall for the crusades in Bagdad (old ones... not Bush's crusades) was that there was so much blood it flowed in rivers. Anyone and everyone was killed. This was in the name of religion.
Mmmm! What a peace loving people the muslims were! They managed to get all the way up the Spanish peninsula before being turned back by peaceful means!
It's six of one and half a dozen of the other. The quicker that both sides realise that we are ruled by a bunch of greedy, bloodthirsty leaders, the better for us all.
We are all being manipulated.