The Leopard
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,877
- Likes
- 1,021
Lep
How can I name one without personal experience? Aside from some professional mentoring in the early days (free since a friend) I suppose the biggest influence since then has been Marc Rivalland via his Swing Trading book some ten or more years ago. I see he has moved on from the book and "sells" seminars and if those are as measured as his book about the claims for his method then I think he'd fit the bill.
I think it defies all logic to suppose that trading is the only profession in the world that cannot be taught, both in technique and mental attitude, and that there are not excellent teachers whose primary skill lies in the teaching rather than the doing.
I don't think we're really disagreeing, actually.
Sure, there is much that can be usefully taught (although I think that there is more in the learning than the teaching). And excellent teachers, no doubt - we're all familiar with the fact that Tiger Woods was probably coached by someone who couldn't win major tournaments etc.
But that is the point. There might be some who can teach but can't trade. Let's say we accept this to be true, can you name any who tell people this honestly? Every single one that I am aware of is a great trader, makes oodles at it, and doesn't need to teach. They do it because <insert frankly insulting nonsense of choice here>.
I am sure there are people out there who can teach and do teach. But I am not aware of any that advertise, use forums etc that have any evidence to support their claims. We know that some people can and have done it - Richard Dennis for example. But he's not the kind of person we're talking about.
All I asked for is one case of this nature where claims have been verified, or there is at least strong evidence for them. No-one has produced one. That's not the same as saying that I don't think anything useful about trading can be taught.