tar
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,443
- Likes
- 1,314
tar
that mean "not acceptable" far as you're concerned?
jon
Maybe it was acceptable but it turned to an ugly discussion and the end wasn't that pleasant .
tar
that mean "not acceptable" far as you're concerned?
jon
But how would you feel if anyone could set up a course on how to conduct open heart surgery, and the graduates of those courses, where then deemed to be qualified work in hospitals, operating on members of the public.
Would that be OK for you, or would you prefer that there was some degree of regulation, where surgeons where required to study in accredited institutions, taught by people who actually had experience of treating live patients ?
In one case, you risk losing your life, and in the case of a trading vendor, you only risk losing your wealth.
Agreed. And not to mention totally boring.so i think the whole anti-vendor campaign is boll0x
Agreed. And not to mention totally boring.
Until someone actually causes a problem through trying to gyp gullible newbies, or free ad their wares or any other apparent subterfuge that most of us old hands are already well enough equipped to handle on an ad hoc basis, I'm not going to spend any more time reading this drivel about vendors. It’s far worse than anything vendors ever come up with in terms of wasted time and effort against any payback.
At least with a genuine and justified vendor bash you get the fun of poking holes, making them look stupid and eventually hounding them out.
This crap has NONE of that.
So, I’m not investing, I’m out.
Carry on bitching bitches.
is there any sign of an increase in "secret vendors"? You know, those who act as kosher members and use more devious means to attract potential customers.
Have you recently been a victim of precisely this ploy?and what if they tried to convince you that they were genuine surgeons by having nice testimonials on their website from people they had operated on, only to later find out that they had just made them up with photos they copied from the internet?
Maybe it was acceptable but it turned to an ugly discussion and the end wasn't that pleasant .
Trading most of the day and avoiding threads that meant nothing to me.
Have you recently been a victim of precisely this ploy?
No. Didn’t think so.
Have you recently been the victim of ANY ploy - trading related or any other kind?
No. Didn't think so.
Have your actions and all those of all the other randomly vacuous bashers of non-existent vendors over the last few months spent carping on about an evil that doesn't actually exist, actually saved anyone from any such ploy?
Probably not.
do you think it acceptable for a vendor to have a thread to answer questions about their product.
Just checked out the link provided.
A very high probability shill posts. Post #1.
From post #2 it's clear it's a scam, whatever.
Where exactly is there a problem with how that got dealt with? It was murdered in the womb quick as a flash. As they pretty much always are.
The fact that a few of you manage to carry it on for X posts discussing the spelling, grammar and thuggy prose style is a separate issue and I’m all for the lulz, but don’t kid yourselves you’re doing a public service to t2w or that this indicates any lack in the current handling of vendors.
No newbies were harmed in the killing of this attempt at covert vending. However, hundreds have probably been put off for good by the hundreds of vacuous posts that have absolutely nothing of interest in relation to trading.
OK. OK. You win. I’ve made my mind up.Make your mind up, you were accusing us of being 'randomly vacuous bashers of non-existent vendors' a minute ago.
ok - but ignoring how it developed (and that's probably moderators' fault) do you think it acceptable for a vendor to have a thread to answer questions about their product. We're a bit haphazard on this at the moment - allowing some and not others.
jon
You're all doing a fantastic job for t2w
.
Not all the vendors are the same.
What about having a sub forum with vendors who have at least 3 year track record of being consistently profitable traders? :idea:
.
There are none.