my journal 3


"spirit release". 95% of us are inhabited by spirits, and very few of these spirits are demons.
 
Did you know that exorcisms exist in many religions?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism#Judaism
In more recent times, Rabbi Yehuda Fetaya authored the book Minchat Yahuda, which deals extensively with exorcism, his experience with possessed people, and other subjects of Jewish thought. The book is written in Hebrew and was translated into English.

Rabbi Gershon Winkler of New Mexico explains that the procedure for a Jewish exorcism is intended not only to drive away the possessing force, but to help both the possessor and the possessed in an act of healing. The Jewish exorcism ritual is performed by a rabbi who has mastered practical Kabbalah. Also present is a minyan (a group of ten adult males), who gather in a circle around the possessed person. The group recites Psalm 91 three times, and then the rabbi blows a shofar (a ram's horn).[20]

The shofar is blown in a certain way, with various notes and tones, in effect to "shatter the body" so that the possessing force will be shaken loose. After it has been shaken loose, the rabbi begins to communicate with it and ask it questions such as why it is possessing the body of the possessed. The minyan may pray for it and perform a ceremony for it in order to enable it to feel safe, and so that it can leave the person's body.[20]
Click to expand...
 

hmm, very wise person but probably wrong. Just look at this video below:

 
Maybe in the last few days I have lost some readers who probably think I've gone mad, and I realize that the sharp conclusions I have drawn, that demons exist, after watching the magicians (blatant proof), which I posted extensively a few days ago, might have alienated and scared some of you guys. I had no idea that facts and reasoning would ever lead me to this conclusion. But I cannot suspend my reasoning just because a few more people will think that I am crazy. I am used to being disappointed by people anyway.

So, recapitulating, here's my progress.

2007: I watch Loose Change and realize that... amazingly I have been lied to by the world media and that politicians do not tell the truth, and the opposition doesn't either.

2011-2012: I discover peak oil and after a few years off, I get back into conspiracy theories. I further study medicine and the hidden cures, and so realize that they're lying to me not just about 911 but about a whole new list of subjects: JFK, moon landing, Oklahoma City Bombing, London and Madrid bombings, Boston marathon, Sandy Hook and all the events that follow 2011.

2014-2015: after another short break, after studying German and prof. Ganser's work on Gladio and NATO covert wars, and right after Charlie Hebdo re-awakens me even further, I get back into the subject and realize that all the terrorism in Europe, too, after WW2, was part of this evil secret plan. I study more about the plan, through Dr. Day's revelations, re-assess everything, and even get to understand that these secret societies all have in common one thing: worship of the devil. But this last realization required the extra step of accepting that demons exist, although I don't see them (but I saw what they did on youtube, especially in the videos of the magicians but also in the shapeshifting people, cf. previous posts).

So basically whereas I initially thought that Bush was evil and everyone was good, I now have realized that even Hitler was possessed and that all these people are possessed, and that it all started with the occultists who came to America 400 years ago. A minority of occultists and a majority of Christians. 400 years later the Christians got dumbed down and the occultists are totally in control.

I am starting to think that this is just a bad dream, but it probably is not, and yet this impression is also what keeps others from realizing it is the truth.

Another interesting fact I noticed is that there are several levels of "waking up". You find out about 911 and think you're going to wake up others, while in most cases you're still asleep about everything else: first of all about the fact that secret societies are in control of everything, and second of all about the fact that Lucifer is in control of them.

One last fact that really puzzles me is if David Icke is in bad or in good faith. I think he's been deceiving us, but I can't accept the fact that a person who looks so sincere is actually lying to all of us. Not that i am a cult follower but if he's deceiving us so well, then I can't even trust my own parents anymore.
 
Last edited:
It's over, guys. They have even possessed Merkel, Grillo and even Robert De Niro, all my favorite heroes:




start reciting your prayers

 




hmm... this is really a tough one. The mainstream media, including shill Anderson Cooper, exposes an exorcist, who does seem a fraud. Who do I believe? The mainstream media that usually lies or the exorcist who seems dishonest?

Furthermore, the exorcisms seem real. Could it be that exorcisms work even when performed by a dishonest person? It might be the case. If the exorcised ones were all acting, we should be able to catch one laughing, as it is usually the case for the crisis actors like Robbie Parker used for Sandy Hook.


Hmm, maybe, just maybe, this is what happens when he takes 3 people who are not actors and who are skeptics? They show no reaction, and even laugh (min. 7:56).

Maybe this phenomenon has a lot to do with autosuggestion.


...

Yeah, he is probably a scam. This is a real exorcism:


I think this is the explanation of the videos I have posted. Real demon possessions exist, but they're not as frequent as Bob Larson would have us believe. Furthermore, as shown at minute 9 of the video below, when Bob Larson meets a real possessed person, he sends them away, because he probably cannot do a real exorcism:

 
Last edited:

min 8
animal mutilations done by creatures from outer space

So, let me get this straight, Richard Dolan and Linda Moulton-Howe believe in extra-terrestrial creatures from outer space? Since I respect so much Richard Dolan then it seems that on this earth there is pretty much everyone: demons, and extraterrestrials, too. They don't seem to be the same thing.
 
TheVigilantChristian vs. MaNithyaSudevi


The Third Eye = Satanic Portal to The Demonic Realm
Very very interesting and very credible person.

Keep in mind that I was agnostic until a week ago.

My question is: how do we know that these demons are bad? Couldn't he just say a little bit more about them?

He says at minute 11: "the bible reveals to us..." but that's not good enough. I wish he told us a bit more about what these demons were telling him and how it was a "deception" and how it was evil. It would be enough if he just told me that they ask him to kill someone. But he does not say one single thing. At any rate, for the moment, I aborted all such third eye training, such as this (WARNING, MAY OPEN THIRD EYE TO SATAN):


Such contradictory advice from all these guys. Vigilant Christian seems very trustworthy but he cites the bible as source of information, which is not a given, since many of the things it says do not seem reliable to me.

This MaNithyaSudevi instead seems to be telling me to open the door to the demon, but he seems like a good person, too, and furthermore he tells me to not drink fluoride, which is something that I know to be right, for sure.

A way to reconcile all these theories could be this. The elite are satanists and they're giving me fluoride in order to prevent me to talk to demons. However, talking to demons is also a bad thing, even though the elite are trying to keep me from it.

The girl is opening the third eye to talk to demons, but maybe not all demons are bad. Anyway, since it is so dangerous, I will only listen to those telling me not to do it, and in the meanwhile try to hear more about their experiences.

More from MaNithyaSudevi on these experiences - WARNING - BE CAREFUL:


Maybe she is not evil. Maybe if you are a good person, like she seems to be, you can survive opening up your third eye. Or maybe she is wrong. I can't tell for sure. SO BE CAREFUL.

I should keep studying both these people, the one speaking against the third eye and the one speaking in favor:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheVigilantChristian/videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/MaNithyaSudevi/videos

"Angels" and "spirit guides", that's what she calls them. He calls them "demons". For sure these entities do exist. I found out by watching these videos, and it changed my understanding of the world quite a bit:


They both seem in good faith, the beautiful girl and the intelligent Christian. I also saw all his other videos, and he seems in line with all my beliefs, so I will listen to the girl, just out of curiosity, but I will keep in mind his warnings. And for sure I won't do the exercises she's suggesting.
 
Last edited:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Quaid#.22Star_Whackers.22_and_Canadian_exile
On October 22, 2010, Quaid and his wife sought protection under the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, after being arrested in the Kerrisdale neighborhood of Vancouver.[26] Subsequently, they applied for refugee status on the grounds that they fear for their lives in the United States, claiming that numerous actors have died under mysterious circumstances committed by the "Hollywood star whackers".[27] They were granted bail on the condition of $10,000 bond pending further Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada hearings.[28] However, due to their failure to deposit the required bond with the court for several days, they remained in custody of the Canada Border Services Agency.[29] They were released on October 27 after the discovery that Evi Quaid is a "prima facie Canadian citizen".[30][31][32] On July 15, 2011 an attempt to extradite Randy and Evi Quaid from Canada failed when the U.S. Department of Justice turned down a request from the Santa Barbara County district attorney calling for the Quaids to be returned to California to face the felony burglary charges dating from the September 2010 incident.[33] As a result, Quaid and his wife would be subject to arrest in the United States.[34] In January 2013, Canadian immigration officials denied Randy Quaid's request for permanent resident status in Canada[35] while leaving open the option to challenge this decision in Canadian Federal Court.[36]

In 2011, Eva produced a low-budget docudrama, Star Whackers, starring Randy, which ruminated upon the allegedly existent criminal conspiracy.
Click to expand...
Oh, "alleged" and "conspiracy", the usual conspiracy theorist, of course.


 
Last edited:



Yep, it's the agenda explained by Dr. Dunegan:
https://drrichardday.wordpress.com/audio/

Transcript here:

http://100777.com/nwo/barbarians#11
ENCOURAGING HOMOSEXUALITY ... ANYTHING GOES
HOMOSEXUALITY ALSO WAS TO BE ENCOURAGED.

"People will be given permission to be homosexual," that's the way it was stated. They won't have to hide it. And elderly people will be encouraged to continue to have active sex lives into the very old ages, just as long as they can. Everyone will be given permission to have sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes. This is the way it was put. And, I remember thinking, "how arrogant for this individual, or whoever he represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to do things!" But that was the terminology that was used. In this regard, clothing was mentioned. Clothing styles would be made more stimulating and provocative. Recall back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt, when those mini-skirts were very, very high and very revealing. He said, "It is not just the amount of skin that is expressed ... exposed that makes clothing sexually seductive, but other, more subtle things are often suggestive.".. things like movement, and the cut of clothing, and the kind of fabric, the positioning of accessories on the clothing. "If a woman has an attractive body, why should she not show it?" was one of the statements. There was not detail on what was meant by "provocative clothing," but since that time if you watched the change in clothing styles, blue jeans are cut in a way that they're more tight-fitting in the crotch. They form wrinkles. Wrinkles are essentially arrows. Lines which direct one's vision to certain anatomic areas. And, this was around the time of the "burn your bra" activity. He indicated that a lot of women should not go without a bra. They need a bra to be attractive, so instead of banning bras and burning them, bras would come back. But they would be thinner and softer allowing more natural movement. It was not specifically stated, but certainly a very thin bra is much more revealing of the nipple and what else is underneath, than the heavier bras that were in style up to that time.
Click to expand...


http://100777.com/nwo/barbarians#40
SEX AND VIOLENCE INCULCATED THROUGH ENTERTAINMENT

Entertainment. Movies would gradually be made more explicit as regards sex and language. After all, sex and rough language are real and why pretend that they are not? There would be pornographic movies in the theaters and on television. VCR's were not around at that time, but he had indicated that these cassettes would be available, and video cassette players would be available for use in the home and pornographic movies would be available for use on these as well as in the neighborhood theater and on your television. He said something like: "you'll see people in the movies doing everything you can think of." He went on to say that all of this is intended to bring sex out in the open. That was another comment that was made several times- the term "sex out in the open." Violence would be made more graphic. This was intended to desensitize people to violence. There might need to be a time when people would witness real violence and be a part of it. Later on it will become clear where this is headed. So there would be more realistic violence in entertainment which would make it easier for people to adjust. People's attitudes toward death would change. People would not be so fearful of it but more accepting of it, and they would not be so aghast at the sight of dead people or injured people. We don't need to have a genteel population paralyzed by what they might see. People would just learn to say, well I don't want that to happen to me. This was the first statement suggesting that the plan includes numerous human casualties which the survivors would see. This particular aspect of the presentation came back in my memory very sharply a few years later when a movie about the Lone Ranger came out and I took my very young son to see it and early in the movie were some very violent scenes. One of the victims was shot in the forehead and there was sort of a splat where the bullet entered his forehead and blood and I remember regretting that I took my son and feeling anger toward the doctor who spoke. Not that he made the movie, but he agreed to be part of this movement, and I was repelled by the movie and it brought back this aspect of his presentation very sharply in my memory. As regards music, he made a rather straightforward statement like: Music will get worse. In 1969 Rock music was getting more and more unpleasant. It was interesting just his words-the way he expressed it " it would get worse" acknowledging that it was already bad. Lyrics would become more openly sexual. No new sugary romantic music would be publicized like that which had been written before that time. All of the old music would be brought back on certain radio stations and records for older people to hear, and older folks would have sort of their own radio stations to hear and for younger people, their music as it got worse and worse would be on their stations. He seemed to indicate that one group would not hear the other group's music. Older folks would just refuse to hear the junk that was offered to young people, and the young people would accept the junk because it identified them as their generation and helped them feel distinct from the older generation. I remember at the time thinking that would not last very long because even young kids wouldn't like the junk when they got a chance to hear the older music that was prettier they would gravitate toward it. Unfortunately I was wrong about that, when the kids get through their teens and into their 20's some of them improve their taste in music, but unfortunately he was right. They get used to this junk and that's all they want. A lot of them can't stand really pretty music. He went on to say that the music would carry a message to the young and nobody would even know the message was there they would just think it was loud music. At the time I didn't understand quite what he meant by that, but in retrospect I think we know now what the messages are in the music for the young. And again he was right. This aspect was sort of summarized with the notion that entertainment would be a tool to influence young people. It won't change the older people, they are already set in their ways, but the changes would all be aimed at the young who are in their formative years and the older generation would be passing. Not only could you not change them but they are relatively unimportant anyhow. Once they live out their lives and are gone the younger generation being formed are the ones that would be important for the future in the 21st century. He also indicated all the old movies would be brought back again and I remember on hearing that through my mind ran quickly the memory of a number of old movies. I wondered if they would be included, the ones that I thought I would like to see again. Along with bringing back old music and movies for older people there were other privileges that would also be accorded older folks: free transportation, breaks on purchases, discounts, tax discounts, - a number of privileges just because they were older. This was stated to be sort of a reward for the generation which had grown up through the depression and had survived the rigors of World War II. They had deserved it and they were going to be rewarded with all these goodies, and the bringing back of the good old music and the good old movies was going to help ease them through their final years in comfort. Then the presentation began to get rather grim, because once that generation passed, and that would be in the late 80's and early 90's where we are now, most of that group would be gone and then gradually things would tighten up and the tightening up would be accelerated. The old movies and old songs would be withdrawn, the gentler entertainment would be withdrawn.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
masonic pyramid of merkel and others, and duping delight of crisis actors



 
Last edited:
I can't believe that Merkel is one of them. I was hoping that she would stop them, but the evidence is overwhelming.

Min. 1 and following, her occult symbolism:



demonically possessed:


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Yamato
  • Locked
my journal 2
169 170 171
Replies
3K
Views
471K
timsk
timsk
J
  • Poll
Trading journals: general discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
athvia
A
N
Ninja's Journal
Replies
5
Views
1K
Ninja377
N
G
need help with Journal template and macros
Replies
0
Views
2K
grego99
G
T
Trading Journals and No Trading Journals
Replies
14
Views
3K
hhiusa
hhiusa
Top