pipsplease
Active member
- Messages
- 225
- Likes
- 62
No I am not saying that at all Ross and I am certainly not coming out in support of Baghdady.
What I saying is that unfounded acusations and claims which can not be backed with proof are not helping anyone except perhaps those with unterior motives. From what I can gather the posts are not from disgruntled clients but unrealted individuals.
I understand that the attacks on Baghdady in this forum include some insiders with possible unterior motives (and therefore not in the best interest of the readers). For motives always look for those who gain.
I pointed out the new website: Janet McAnuff | 'Trade Smarter'
From what I understand Janet used to work for Baghdady and is now setting up a rival business using the same material.
The main point I am making is that training can be good for some people but not every course is good for every person. Always get enough information to decide if a course is right for you before you part with a large sum of money. Also consider you might learn more from reading a book and investing the thousands you would pay for a course in actually having a go at trading.
Always do due diligance to ascertain the facts from both the company and people posting in forums.
I don not like to be mislead by a company or individuals on forums with unterior motives.
Unfortunatly a couple of the posters appear not to have liked what I said.
I must admit I played with them a bit and turned the table to see how they would react and it was amusing.
I do not know if I am included in the "couple of posters" you mention but regardless of this let me clarify matters for the readers.
I am neither an ex-employee nor an insider. I did once pay over some money to the Baghdady outfit and therefore qualify as a client.
I am also in the position of knowing a few memebrs of staff(ex) and quite a few clients who have paid over lots more than I ever did.
As a consequence I have been able to access a lot of information and put it to the benefit of the readers of this forum. Others have been in a similar situation and have done likewise on this forum and elsewhere.
What you fail to understand, but a few enlightened souls have, is that to publish the absolute "proof" in all cases would expose the source of the information. That I am not prepared to do unless the source is comfortable with it.
You may not be entirely happy with this but it is a reflection on the effect Baghdady has had on these people. There is much more that could be said about Baghdady and what he was up to and maybe in time some more of this will come out. Wait until the former Sales Manager (who has posted on here) completes his tribunal for unfair dismissal. I think you will then get confirmation of everything and more that has been posted on here.
What is clear is that Baghdady is not as he has claimed, has been prepared to be more than economical with the truth, has left a lot of people with unpaid bills, has lied quite brazenly about the turtle operation and in recent months has taken money for goods and services not delivered. (refer to the post below from otto9586 and there are others).
There are many who paid for "Mentoring" who have not received this and many who have paid for the software and have problems. Guess what? They cannot get help or support and Baghdady now cannot be contacted. Those who did early on when things went belly up were told to f--k off.
He upped sticks and ran away after almost his entire staff walked out on him following the assault on his then VP Sales. In his wake he has left a lot of people damaged and out of pocket. Both clients and service providers.
There are legal cases against him, some completed (former unpaid accountants) and some in due process at the moment (Sales manager Tribunal and others). It is for those involved to come on here if they wish when they wish.
What this thread on this forum has achieved is to ensure what he was doing has been exposed. That must help anyone who is carrying out "due diligence".
What you have not witnessed is Baghdady himself come forward and deny, argue or debate. He used his staff subjects for this until they had enough. He is a classic coward and bully who was eventually challenged and exposed.
As the Leopard has stated, "new things emerge fairly regularly" .
In the spirit of providing something new and as clear evidence I will later today post something new and that is clearly evidence of what Baghdady is. No if's, buts or maybes.
I do hope that this will satify you a little and more importantly, ensure the many readers on this forum and those doing their "due diligence" that Baghdady is not someone to entrust your hard earned cash to.
Last edited: