Technical Analysis
hlpsg said:
Hi Socrates, what were you referring to in the above statement? Thanks.
I was referring to post number 20, above.
The reason for my comment is that before you can progress to total proficiency in any market, in any instrument, under any conditions, in any exchange anywhere in the world, at any time, which is the "mission" for expert traders, you ought to gain proper proficiency in Technical Analysis first, as a proper grounding in what is essential education for any trader.
After this is achieved there is much further work to be done, but first things first.
This is because all liquid and properly regulated markets operate on similar principles.
Prices change according to supply and demand, and because ot the imbalances that are caused to exist between them, and not for other reasons popularly bandied about.
Each Exchange has its own parameters of regulation, and operational requirements. Each instrument has its own characteristics in terms of price behaviour, range, intent, use of time, and of course Volume, etc.,
This makes each instrument specifically different, but similar in its response to schedules relating to what I mention above.
Fundamental Analysis has its place, for long term investing, but not for active trading.
Sadly, Fundamental Analysis is frequently included in the syllabuses for many professions dealing either directly or indirectly with the market. This is a point of weakness.
Many professionals are startled and even shocked to realise, when presented with the correct facts relating to technical analysis, that they are using the wrong yardstick persistently, and therefore, are baffled as to why they results they get are not the ones they would expect in accordance with what they have been taught.