Mike Baghdady - should I take a course or not?

I think you missed my point. I have a degree from Leicester, my point is that there's no need to take everything personally. Likewise if a feminist were to take offence at your avatar I'd also say they were over reacting.

1. I have changed my avatar. This should fix the issue and stop giving mixed signals to feminists. :)

2. Different groups of people from various cultures and countries have different tolerance levels. It is the natural tendency of people to protect their groups and their beliefs.

3. What works in Japan culture wise will not work in America. Lots of Japanese find Americans as rude people. Many brits find americans rude but both brits and japs may not necessarily be correct in their assumptions.

4. I took an offense because it was my natural tendency to defend my tribe. Every one at some level does the same. A lot of Pakistanis would have ignored it. I chose not to but that is my personal choice.

5. I did not ask for an apology because you do not find your statement offensive which is fine and alright.

Lets cut this right here before people are further diverted away from the core of the issue. Less distractions are needed.
 
1. I have changed my avatar. This should fix the issue and stop giving mixed signals to feminists. :)

2. Different groups of people from various cultures and countries have different tolerance levels. It is the natural tendency of people to protect their groups and their beliefs.

3. What works in Japan culture wise will not work in America. Lots of Japanese find Americans as rude people. Many brits find americans rude but both brits and japs may not necessarily be correct in their assumptions.

4. I took an offense because it was my natural tendency to defend my tribe. Every one at some level does the same. A lot of Pakistanis would have ignored it. I chose not to but that is my personal choice.

5. I did not ask for an apology because you do not find your statement offensive which is fine and alright.

Lets cut this right here before people are further diverted away from the core of the issue. Less distractions are needed.

I'd love to cut this right here but I'm afraid your racist rant above makes that impossible.

I presume you realise that the term you used above (J**s) is considered to be highly offensive and is a racist and xenophobic term of abuse.

I am surprised that a person with Pakistani roots should use such a term, bearing in mind that the standard taunt used against such people by ignorant bigots is a similar shortening of the word to describe someone from that country. How would you feel if a Japanese person on this forum used the shortened and highly offensive form of "Pakistani" in such a casual manner?

Racist abuse of this nature is not acceptable. I will be taking this up with the forum administrators, and will consider whether or not to report the incident to the authorities as a hate crime.
 
I think it awful the way this forum seems to single out Aussie Bob and other good Australians for being shonks.
You're a bunch of of racists.
 
I'd love to cut this right here but I'm afraid your racist rant above makes that impossible.

I presume you realise that the term you used above (J**s) is considered to be highly offensive and is a racist and xenophobic term of abuse.

I am surprised that a person with Pakistani roots should use such a term, bearing in mind that the standard taunt used against such people by ignorant bigots is a similar shortening of the word to describe someone from that country. How would you feel if a Japanese person on this forum used the shortened and highly offensive form of "Pakistani" in such a casual manner?

Racist abuse of this nature is not acceptable. I will be taking this up with the forum administrators, and will consider whether or not to report the incident to the authorities as a hate crime.

1. Yes you are correct again. The word "J**s" is racist towards the Japanese people now that I have confirmed it on the Internet. I have learnt this word from American movies while growing up. A lot of american media uses this word frequently in the war movies but wrong is wrong.

2. I apologize for any Japanese forum members for using this term. At least I have the moral ability to do this.

2. But wrong is wrong and racist abuse of this nature is not acceptable. Please do report me to the forum administrators and local law enforcement authorities and I am ready to face the trial and its resultant judgement. I used a racist term unknowingly due to my ignorance and must pay the appropriate price for it.
 
1. Yes you are correct again. The word "J**s" is racist towards the Japanese people now that I have confirmed it on the Internet. I have learnt this word from American movies while growing up. A lot of american media uses this word frequently in the war movies but wrong is wrong.

2. I apologize for any Japanese forum members for using this term. At least I have the moral ability to do this.

2. But wrong is wrong and racist abuse of this nature is not acceptable. Please do report me to the forum administrators and local law enforcement authorities and I am ready to face the trial and its resultant judgement. I used a racist term unknowingly due to my ignorance and must pay the appropriate price for it.

Shariah law would suggest a public stoning or amputation of limb is appropriate punishment. Due to the logistics involved if you would self-administer and confirm when done, that would suffice.
 
1. Yes you are correct again. The word "J**s" is racist towards the Japanese people now that I have confirmed it on the Internet. I have learnt this word from American movies while growing up. A lot of american media uses this word frequently in the war movies but wrong is wrong.

2. I apologize for any Japanese forum members for using this term. At least I have the moral ability to do this.

2. But wrong is wrong and racist abuse of this nature is not acceptable. Please do report me to the forum administrators and local law enforcement authorities and I am ready to face the trial and its resultant judgement. I used a racist term unknowingly due to my ignorance and must pay the appropriate price for it.

I was joking about reporting it, and it was obvious you didn't mean anything by it in any case. I've never understood why words like that are used to or considered to give offence - it's just a shortened form of a perfectly normal word, like "Brits".

Still though, maybe we could all be a bit more sensible and not look for offence where clearly none was intended?
 
Shariah law would suggest a public stoning or amputation of limb is appropriate punishment. Due to the logistics involved if you would self-administer and confirm when done, that would suffice.

Oh this is just too much !
Better make that 2 x amputations and a stoning.

About safvan
Real Name
Boob Massager
Occupation
Controlling Losses
Country
Afghanistan
Gender
Male
Interests
Trading, Investing, Porn, Movies, Music, Politics
Traderpedia Contributor
No
Profile Pic
yes
 
I think it awful the way this forum seems to single out Aussie Bob and other good Australians for being shonks.
You're a bunch of of racists.

Flamin' Galah. You sound like you've got a kangaroo loose in the top paddock.
 
Shariah law would suggest a public stoning or amputation of limb is appropriate punishment. Due to the logistics involve if you would self-administer and confirm when done, that would suffice.

I would love to apply Shariah law here but unfortunately there is no term or clause of using racist words on public internet forums. Pakistan follows Shariah law mostly under cases that involve sex outside marriage/gay sex and blasphemy thanks to a dictator called Mr. Zia who introduced them to protect his throne. He was a bad person.

There are personal harassment laws which work under Civil courts that were approved recently in Pakistan. I could be tried under those but again the case has to be submitted first. Remember I am a defendant here.

I am not sure about amputation of limbs but public stoning is usually carried out in the cases of having gay sex, sex outside marriage or blasphemy. I have committed none of those so this is out of the question if even Leopard won the case.
 
Oh this is just too much !
Better make that 2 x amputations and a stoning.

About safvan
Real Name
Boob Massager
Occupation
Controlling Losses
Country
Afghanistan
Gender
Male
Interests
Trading, Investing, Porn, Movies, Music, Politics
Traderpedia Contributor
No
Profile Pic
yes


Stoning is out of the question because it requires a different set of rule breakage mentioned in my previous post.

Amputation not too sure about this one because I am not aware of what kind of law breakage results in that.
 
Safvan

Seriously, you are taking this too seriously.

Nah I am not. I have lived in the UK and US for nearly 8 years and am well aware of the humor side of things.

I apologize for my previous outburst it was uncalled for and I think it was because of untimely intake of a strong cup of coffee. Peace man.
 
I was joking about reporting it, and it was obvious you didn't mean anything by it in any case. I've never understood why words like that are used to or considered to give offence - it's just a shortened form of a perfectly normal word, like "Brits".

Still though, maybe we could all be a bit more sensible and not look for offence where clearly none was intended?

Relax man I am just messing around. I apologized to pboyles in my previous post for the unnecessary outburst.

V r cool.
 
Flamin' Galah. You sound like you've got a kangaroo loose in the top paddock.
Or one brick short of a pallet.
Hey, on this shortening of national names.
I knew an Egyptian once and he took offence to being called a Gypo.
I have a friend who is Japanese although mostly schooled in California never said anything
when I would refer to the "mad Japs". Maybe he was too kind so I will ask him about it.
Do the Pakistanis mind being called "Pakies"?
I use to love watching Shoaib Akhtar giving the Aussie batsman a bit curry.
 
you can call me bad words, you can call me slang names, you can even call me 4-letter words, but FFS, don't call me late for dinner.

Peter
 
There is someone on this thread right now who claims to be a turtle. Yet not even a simple statement such as "We were provided with £X to trade with. We have not been ordered to liquidate all positions. I did not see any bailiffs on the dates when they were alleged to have visited recently etc".

Why not?
 
wtf! :eek:

thread_direction_2.gif
 
Top