Not from what I've seen since but never mind.
I'll reply to your post on Iraq soon but as a preview you can already assume I am rather unconcerned that the western powers abused their might in order to topple Saddam, but I am very concerned that having achieved his defeat, there was no viable plan for the country during the aftermath.
Back soon.
(1) Consider this, in addition to earlier, now that you are more specific .................. but it does appear that the blood of the English is also deeply ingrained within you. I got a similar answer once from a Nazi re: Jews
(a) Saddam did nothing wrong to
provoke anybody. What happens in a another country is no business of any Western power.
(b) Even assuming toppling Saddam was justified, what about the 1 million innocent civilians killed?
You are unconcerned about both (a) and (b) in your comment in red in quote
------------------------------------------------
(2) viable plan for the country? Jesus H Christ, Blair/Bush took a functioning country with a thriving middle-class and razed it to the ground into a thriving criminal and death camp and turmoil and disorder of epic proportions.
I repeat: Nobody brought to justice for killing 1 million people and all the damage done to an entire country.
-----------------------------------------------
heck, in our world if one walks up to a house and breaks a gate or a fence or a wall or a window or damages a car, its jail time baby. Look at the tsunami of difference. We are talking about a tsunami waves of infinite height in comparison