Oh go on then, there’s nothing on the TV as usual and I’m game for a bit of sport……
Sam, dear boy……
I have added some comments to the long winded ramble you seem to have published below. I have found some sections to be rather difficult to master, as obviously your command of written English is not first rate. Which, incidentally, is strange for somebody who grew up in Coventry and went to university in Leicester (no brummie jokes please chaps…..), although I would like to congratulate you in completing your Masters in two years. Excellent work, most people take four or five.
Forgive me for asking, as I’m sure you read these forums, would you be the same Samuel Salvatore Zumbe that was a director of two UK companies now dissolved; Caerus Equinox Management in York and Caerus-Global-Capital (UK) of Leicester and the current director of Caerus Global Capital registered to your accountants in London and recently just managing to avoid being struck off, again? Its just your online profile says these are businesses in New York? And they all appear to be in the construction sector, rather than high finance? (T2W, this is all in the public domain, companies house.)
Whilst looking at your CV you forgot to mention on your action packed LinkedIn profile your time at IBEX construction. That is you on the left in the photo yes, the business development director?
http://www.asap-pr.com/?postid=244#
Or your time at Sovereign and partners in Geneva (you do get around)?
http://geneva.angloinfo.com/forum/user/894224/
Mind you, your latest venture (Newport) has only been formed in Delaware since March 2015, good timing that what with CWM’s problems that month. And you managed to get all those bank licences in four months wow, nearly as quick as your masters degree.
http://www.bizapedia.com/de/NEWPORT-ENTERPRISES-GROUP-LLC.html
I see your business partner “Jean-Philippe Grange” has an online profile remarkably similar this this nice chap
https://kz.linkedin.com/pub/essen-shokparov/37/71/b5 who seems to specialise in this type of fraud:
https://www.linkedin.com/grp/home?gid=4267906 (anyone interested in this type of nonsense can read up on it here
http://www.tannerdewitt.com/conditional-mt-103-no-siree/ ) but its all garbage.
So, an interesting life you chaps lead.
I thought I’d offer a few words on your letter doing the rounds:
Many of you may have seen the so called Off Shore Alert.
OffshoreAlert editor David Marchant interviews fraudsters Sam Zumbe & Jean Philippe Grange
You will all know that off shore tax havens were outlawed in October of 2014by the OECD members and so he is already operating as a “dodo”.
Maybe you should speak to the Governments of Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Mann, Dubai, Mauritius, BVI, Bahamas, Seychelles, Bermuda and so on and so forth and explain to them offshore jurisdictions are now illegal. (I doubt you know it, but you can even form an offshore company in the UK. But that’s against the international law of the OECD then, is it?)
FACTA is the new offshore and the only legal status for fiscal benefits off shore.
FACTA, or Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, is a piece of US Legislation that requires banks, investment companies, funds and such like to register with the IRS in the US if they have United States taxpayers as clients. It is nothing to do with anything offshore; perhaps you’d explain to Canada for example that this piece of legislation makes them offshore? It’s also not an agency, or regulator or anything like that; it’s just a piece of tax legislation.
The internet is one of the last fee bastions of free speech; however, it does not mean that there is no redress for illegal activity or libel.
Don’t disagree
For those of you that may be concerned, you will need to know that the US Dept. of Justice have already written to this so called journalist (whom is just a “cheap mouth for the City of London ” since they have no evidence to operate in any other manner).
Not quite, if you actually read the site you would see it discuss many things in many jurisdictions. In fact the City of London content is quite small. I also doubt very much anyone has written anything, have they.
The facts are completely wrong and consequently, he has 21 days from the date of the letter to respond to the US Regulators.
What regulator in the US would that be then? Perhaps you might enlighten us as to what regulator controls the Internet? It wouldn’t have escaped your attention that the site and Mr Marchant are based outside the US, so rather difficult for any regulator (in the US) to deal with or claim jurisdiction over, particularly as he’s a journalist, don’t you think? (You guys should know, because you’re not in the US either are you?)
If he does not prove his accusations (impossible), then he will be forced to retract the posting and will certainly lead to financial penalties and possibly the closure of this so called journalist financial alert site.
By whom? Have you filed a defamation claim then? Perhaps you’d post a copy. Given Mr Marchant’s detailed website I’m sure many crooks he has exposed have threatened all sorts of actions. He’s still there though, isn’t he? I for one would love to see you two in court, would you like to go before a judge and prove everything you say?
It pays to be knowledgeable when criticising third parties, sadly for this person, he has made huge mistakes and no research.
Persons assisting this journalist will be deemed to be part of the illegal conspiracy and so it is not recommended.
Illegal conspiracy? Go on then, count me in I love a good conspiracy. And knowledgeable, you two? I think you’ve already sailed that one home sunshine.
Indeed, the recording actually succinctly explains the details of our role for those of you with the patience to listen to his ramblings.
His ramblings? Do you mean a different recording to the one we all listened to as posted here? I thought it was you rambling?
Should anyone have any queries, please feel free to let me know.
Equally, if anyone knows whom has instigated this journalist to make these outrageous accusations, please let us know, the US regulators are gathering their evidence. I should add that this Journalist is only serving to destroy the case for clients to redeem, as the UK regulators do not have this on their agenda at this time.
Clients to redeem what? I am sure that if money was really available the UK regulator and police would be delighted to repatriate to those people CWM stole it from. It’s either there or its not, anything written in the press can’t affect that. Or do you mean, it might stop the investment you are proposing to guarantee the clients a return on their original investment? That will be the secondary scam then!
Why would you care anyway, its not as if you stole it, you just bought the client list?
Redress is only possible in the US.
Why’s that then? If you have something to prove, facts that are in dispute or wrong then it’s very simple. Get your lawyer to file in a jurisdiction where the site, or owner is based, and have your day in court. Got the b@+#s for it chaps?