Brexit and the Consequences

The Maybot doesn't feel pain/emotion/vibes – hence her inability to "get it". However, the electorate possess all these facilities.

So the Maybot possesses so little emotion that she cannot recognise when she (and possibly her govt) are ruined, taking no account of the level of risk. The electorate are left with the margin call, wondering where all the money has gone, the EU winners take all.

The electorate have to find the capital to start trading again but are so psychologically damaged so engage in revenge trading with even higher risk and demands for more margin under a new ruleset.

Eventually a second uncle point will result in the EU banks stepping in to take over the UK in a repeat of a Greece style bailout, we are doomed.
 
So the Maybot possesses so little emotion that she cannot recognise when she (and possibly her govt) are ruined, taking no account of the level of risk. The electorate are left with the margin call, wondering where all the money has gone, the EU winners take all.

The electorate have to find the capital to start trading again but are so psychologically damaged so engage in revenge trading with even higher risk and demands for more margin under a new ruleset.

Eventually a second uncle point will result in the EU banks stepping in to take over the UK in a repeat of a Greece style bailout, we are doomed.

Hmm,

I think the EU have enough problems of their own, which are going to get considerably worse for them when we no deal Brexit.
 
. . .which are going to get considerably worse for them when we no deal Brexit.
I think the remain camp will now do everything they can to force a second referendum. Then they'll all pray to their respective gods that the decision goes the other way; i.e. that we vote to stay in the EU. Thereafter, the whole torrid affair can be swept under the carpet and we can all carry on as before. Nigel Farage will go back to UKIP and start a new campaign and Mrs. May will breathe one giant sigh of relief and cement her place in British political history as the PM who saved us from Brexit. That's my prediction. Not what I want obviously, but, I think it's increasingly likely. Just look at today's breaking news - courtesy of the British Brainwashing Corporation:
Brexit: Vote Leave broke electoral law, says Electoral Commission
Tim.
 
I think the remain camp will now do everything they can to force a second referendum. Then they'll all pray to their respective gods that the decision goes the other way; i.e. that we vote to stay in the EU. Thereafter, the whole torrid affair can be swept under the carpet and we can all carry on as before. Nigel Farage will go back to UKIP and start a new campaign and Mrs. May will breathe one giant sigh of relief and cement her place in British political history as the PM who saved us from Brexit. That's my prediction. Not what I want obviously, but, I think it's increasingly likely. Just look at today's breaking news - courtesy of the British Brainwashing Corporation:
Brexit: Vote Leave broke electoral law, says Electoral Commission
Tim.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ferendum-says-pm-mays-spokesman-idUSKBN1K618F

Never going to happen. One thing they have learned is that a simple binary yes no question cannot possibly deal with the complex multiple combination of reasons why people voted the way they did. Besides which, there isn't time to debate the format or organise it before we leave. That's assuming the govt even survives.

Mays problem is that she has tried from the outset to appease all sides and ended up cobbling together something that pleases no one.

With something as momentous as Brexit, a strong leader who was fully behind delivering Brexit was required from the off. There is no middle way, half in half out fudge compromise, there never was. So the starting point for any arrangement should have been, WTO backstop and then see what could be negotiated from there.

What is being exposed here is the fact that large crony corporations are in cahoots with govt to try and ensure that it's business as usual. All of the EU red tape and regulations apply to 100% of the UK's businesses, when in fact 90% of our businesses have nothing to do with the EU. The whole arrangement is a total farce.

https://fullfact.org/europe/uk-eu-trade/
 
Last edited:
I think the remain camp will now do everything they can to force a second referendum. Then they'll all pray to their respective gods that the decision goes the other way; i.e. that we vote to stay in the EU. Thereafter, the whole torrid affair can be swept under the carpet and we can all carry on as before. Nigel Farage will go back to UKIP and start a new campaign and Mrs. May will breathe one giant sigh of relief and cement her place in British political history as the PM who saved us from Brexit. That's my prediction. Not what I want obviously, but, I think it's increasingly likely. Just look at today's breaking news - courtesy of the British Brainwashing Corporation:
Brexit: Vote Leave broke electoral law, says Electoral Commission
Tim.

The remain campaign have used just about every tactic in the book to get us to stay since the announcement of the referendum, they have used the instruments and institutions of state as part of those tactics, those instruments are mostly remain biased, just look at the members of the electoral commission a remainer EVERY ONE OF THEM.

And still they can't win.....yet.
 

Attachments

  • electoral commission.jpg
    electoral commission.jpg
    177.5 KB · Views: 101
Last edited:
Incompetence is everywhere.

Just look at this 😆

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-44857689


Hmmmm maybe? ... and maybe not?

Tactics...


Both LibDems and Labour now wanting Tories to fail.

I'm against another referendum.
Why ask stupid questions to less than average stupid people to vote on a very complex matter as if they understand what the EU is about? Tell someone they are ignorant and haven't got a clue and they become all indignant and do precisely the opposite. Common knee jerk response. Have to pussy foot around peoples national delicate emotions not to upset them and caress them with careful words praising egos.

👎
 
So the Maybot possesses so little emotion that she cannot recognise when she (and possibly her govt) are ruined, taking no account of the level of risk. The electorate are left with the margin call, wondering where all the money has gone, the EU winners take all.

The electorate have to find the capital to start trading again but are so psychologically damaged so engage in revenge trading with even higher risk and demands for more margin under a new ruleset.

Eventually a second uncle point will result in the EU banks stepping in to take over the UK in a repeat of a Greece style bailout, we are doomed.

I love PivotPoints and first time I'm hearing of an uncle point.

Had to google it.

Definition of 'Uncle Point'
The uncle point is a place where a trader has had enough pain or draw-down and decides that the trade is no longer working and throws in the towel. i.e. the trader flattens his/her position. This includes the point of emotional stress as well as financial analysis of the losses being suffered.


The uncle point is usually the point where you know something is truly going wrong with your system and you take action and get out.

The exact origin of "say uncle" or "cry uncle," first appearing in written English around 1918 is unclear but there are some interesting theories. One theory posits that "uncle" is actually a mangled form of the Irish word "anacol," meaning "protection" or "safety," making a demand from an aggressor to "cry uncle" equivalent to the thug demanding that his victim "cry for help" as a signal of surrender. There's no real evidence to support this theory, but there certainly was no lack of recent Irish immigrants in the U.S. around the turn of the century, so it's not entirely implausible.

The other popular theory about "cry uncle" suggests that the phrase may actually be thousands of years old, and that its origins go all the way back to the Roman Empire. According to this theory, Roman children, when beset by a bully, would be forced to say "Patrue, mi Patruissimo," or "Uncle, my best Uncle," in order to surrender and be freed. As to precisely why Ancient Roman bullies forced their victims to "cry uncle," opinions vary. It may be that the ritual was simply a way of making the victim call out for help from a grownup, thus proving his or her helplessness. Alternatively, it may have started as a way of forcing the victim to grant the bully a title of respect -- in Roman times, your father's brother was accorded nearly the same power and status as your father. The form of "uncle" used in the Latin phrase ("patrue") tends to support this theory, inasmuch as it specifically denoted your paternal uncle, as opposed to the brother of your mother ("avunculus"), who occupied a somewhat lower rung in patrilineal Roman society."


Thanks 👍
 
Hmm,

I think the EU have enough problems of their own, which are going to get considerably worse for them when we no deal Brexit.

This is crap.

So you think UK will simply revert back to WTO rules and trade as before but EU will have more problems of their own???

Like what - striking new trade agreements with Japan?


You a comedian, living in another parallel dimension 😆
 
Hmm,

I think the EU have enough problems of their own, which are going to get considerably worse for them when we no deal Brexit.

There’s more to a “no deal” Brexit than just trading in goods. Where are our planes going to land in Europe for example
 
There’s more to a “no deal” Brexit than just trading in goods. Where are our planes going to land in Europe for example
How do American, Chinese, African, and a bunch more countries that are not part of any EU program land in Europe?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
How do American, Chinese, African, and a bunch more countries that are not part of any EU program land in Europe?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Yes, they’ve all got licences and deals to do so. We’d have to negotiate the same.
 
For anyone who, like me, is struggling to get their swede around all the politicking in recent days since Brexiteers tabled their amendments to Mrs. May's chequers plan - then this YouTube vid' provides some clarity . . .

 
Yes, they’ve all got licences and deals to do so. We’d have to negotiate the same.
I think your confusing rights to land flights from UK to EU with UK carriers having internal eu domestic flight rights. To fly into the eu from the UK requires a foreign carrier permit which won't be a problem.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
I think your confusing rights to land flights from UK to EU with UK carriers having internal eu domestic flight rights. To fly into the eu from the UK requires a foreign carrier permit which won't be a problem.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Maybe, it was just an example of other things that have to be unscrambled beyond the straight trading in goods. And according to the airline association guy it’s perhaps not going to be as easy as you say.
 
Look out for the challenge:

"News just reported the Electoral Commission says Darren Grimes “fined” £20k for alleged offence in Referendum. Think about it. A Regulator can “fine” people. The Bill of Rights (1689), which is still in force, says no one can be fined without a criminal conviction. It’s unlawful."

Gerard Batten
 
For anyone who, like me, is struggling to get their swede around all the politicking in recent days since Brexiteers tabled their amendments to Mrs. May's chequers plan - then this YouTube vid' provides some clarity . . .


Good stuff.

So now you have your swede around it, perhaps the honourable gentleman would care to retract his previous statement that we Brexiters should throw in the towel. 😆
 
Look out for the challenge:

"News just reported the Electoral Commission says Darren Grimes “fined” £20k for alleged offence in Referendum. Think about it. A Regulator can “fine” people. The Bill of Rights (1689), which is still in force, says no one can be fined without a criminal conviction. It’s unlawful."

Gerard Batten
Is this regarding funding the brexit campaign? If so does the 9 million pounds spent by the taxpayer to support a remainer campaign count as breaking the rules too?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
Look out for the challenge:

"News just reported the Electoral Commission says Darren Grimes “fined” £20k for alleged offence in Referendum. Think about it. A Regulator can “fine” people. The Bill of Rights (1689), which is still in force, says no one can be fined without a criminal conviction. It’s unlawful."

Gerard Batten

Its the same as these spot fines by the police, seatbelt, minor traffic violations etc..

The police can issue you a "reduced cost fine" but only on the "admission of your guilt", Now, should you contest it, then it has to go to court for sentencing and in most cases are dropped by the cps due to lack of evidence, Hence the in-car and body cameras becoming the norm.

On the flip side to that, there was a ruling a couple of years ago that enabled car park companies to issue a fine without admission of guilt and/or court.
 
Back
Top