Howie, you are a liar and your pants are on fire. Get a third party to judge this lot if you like (I have never refused this by the way - another lie - I just said I'm not depositing money in your stupid escrow account idea). By all means I am absolutely in favour of that. Nominate one and I will agree or disagree to accept them. Personally, I would suggest asking one of the mods to adjudicate, although I doubt they will want to bother.
Here is my original post:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/trading-journals/110140-watch-howardcohodas-trade-index-options-credit-spreads-145.html#post1443242
A very good post, in which you highlight one of the very serious concerns that potential students must have. Can he teach so soon, and also why would he if he is first and foremost a trader and not just another failure hoping to make a living teaching others to do what he can't?
Clearly, I am highlighting concerns and questions that a potential student might have. I did not say that they were mine, nor did I make any accusation against you.
This was your response:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/trading-journals/110140-watch-howardcohodas-trade-index-options-credit-spreads-146.html#post1443272
You have been pretty good lately in not mischaracterizing me. Let's not revert now.
I have never said that I intend to make my living teaching others. You never asked me what my pricing would be or what I would do with the profits or why I would choose to teach. Without proof it is unfair to characterize my motives negatively. Characterizing me with your own motives is called transference. I don't know your motives so I wont suggest that is the basis of your statement. It is instead, to help inform you when you see statements of my motives made by others.
Amongst all the usual waffle and irrelevant nonsense, you accuse me of "mischaracterizing" [sic] you. I did not do so. You accuse me of characterising your motives negatively. If that tortured construction means what I think it means, I did not do so.
I made no accusations or statements about my own feelings of any kind. I merely speculated on what a potential student might be wondering having read your interview.
You chose to lie about what I had posted. When challenged you preferred to lie again instead of admitting that you were wrong. This has happened many times before, and what is worse you affect the most ridiculously pompous air of smug self-righteousness when you are telling your little lies.
Get a third party to look over the exchange. You say I made an accusation in a certain post, I say I did not. If I didn't, and you persist in saying that I did, there are three possible explanations:
You are deluded.
You are stupid.
You are a liar.
I have chosen the third as the most likely, although the first two seem quite possible.
I say again Howie: you are a liar and your pants are on fire.
Carry on as you like. I notice your post count has jumped down before it jumped back up. Is that because some of your more egregious stuff has been removed? Please don't go over the line so often, it would be so sad to see you banned again. You provide the perfect example of the statistical outlier in the spectrum of posters. Statistical outliers are a good thing for traders to understand.
You refuse to have a third party judge the fairness of your accusations. You fear fair judgment. You want to be witness, judge and jury. There is a term for that and it's not nice. You are just such a fine role model to be looked up to. NOT. You are certainly a legend in your own mind.
Is that enough fodder for some more malicious fraudulent behavior on your part? I hope so, I need to attend to other matters.
