ChartMan said:
I am not "selling" any system, in any way, shape, or form.I leave that for the likes of DW and VS. My approach is ( and always will be) to encourage others to think and analyse for themselves so that they can develop their own systems.
Yes you are. You are charging people 295gbp to come and listen to the details of your personal Dow trading system.
They are not coming to 'think or analyse for themselves', your advert and running order make it absolutely clear that you are going into the specific details of your system.
Granted you may not be selling them the system per se, but you are charging them for the pleasure of listening to you describe your system in detail - which is basically the same thing.
.. or are you about to alter the running schedule again?
What about my other questions?
Why does the title not make it absolutely clear who the audience are?
Why the 25% (my mistake to say 20% in my previous post) 'reduction' for T2W members when the seminar has never been run before and I doubt has been advertised anywhere else? (which is sharp practice at best, illegal claims at worst).
Have you contacted the FSA to make sure you are the right side of their rulings? - or would you prefer to speak to my contacts instead - they would also be interested in the original and secondary adverts, so make sure you have them to hand when you ring them.
It's a pity others don't do the same.
You still don't get it do you.
You created something that was patently wrong. I have already torn the original advert and content to shreads because you weren't going to provide what you claimed. That has now been changed to the current effort. However, yet again it is wrong.
So far your actions have been predictably unprofessional, I don't doubt your sincerity but that is as far as it goes.
As someone who does offer courses/seminars in trading subjects I get very angry with those who produce such a farce that it 'queers the pitch' for those of us that have a genuinely thought out and proven product to offer - at a reasonable price, without fancy 25% gimmicks.
So, do not start with the 'holier than thou' attitude that your parting comment suggests, it is you who are in the wrong - if you weren't perhaps you wouldn't have changed the original advert.
Please answer the questions.