Mr. Charts
Legendary member
- Messages
- 7,370
- Likes
- 1,200
"I'm afraid Richard that we'll just have to 'agree to disagree' on this one!"
Yes, well, Black Swan events do happen
Yes, well, Black Swan events do happen
Last edited:
Because of an infection? And Trump's personality disorder gets a pass?
No, Trump does not get a pass from me! But that does not lessen the fact that, now, it has been rubbed into the American voter that Hilary is not a well woman and she has been ill for some time. The Presidency is for the healthy, wouldn't you say?
As I said before, I am not into US politics, I have enough to think about with our lot. You nominated them--you get on with them!
Hi Richard,
Yes, I understand the message and the logic behind it. However, my personal view is that the sort of person or group that would attack us and thereby cause Mrs May to respond are the likes of IS who - by (my) definition - are as mad as a box of frogs and wouldn't give a toss about whether or not we retaliated. I know I'm something of a lone wolf on this topic here on T2W, but one area in which I'm in 100% agreement with Jem Corbyn is his view on nuclear weapons. Utterly pointless and an appalling waste of money, IMO.
Tim.
And we have a tiny army, navy and a small air force so how else could we stop Belgium from invading us without nuclear weapons? Although we'd only need a small bomb.
No, Trump does not get a pass from me! But that does not lessen the fact that, now, it has been rubbed into the American voter that Hilary is not a well woman and she has been ill for some time. The Presidency is for the healthy, wouldn't you say?
Hi sminicooper,Interesting exchange between Timsk & Richard here and I take Richard's viewpoint. If I may (politely) say so Timsk, - I think you mis-understand how, when & why nuclear weapons would be used/useful but I won't elaborate - let's just agree to disagree!
Hi sminicooper,
Like I say, I realise I'm in a minority of one on this topic on T2W. And I hope you're right that I've just misunderstood how, when and why nuclear weapons would be used. I've followed the debate for 30+ years and, in all that time, I've never once heard a plausible explanation. That said, I'm glad to hear there is one, even if it requires cleverer folk than me to understand it!
Stats on number of nuclear war heads!
Believe it or not there is enough to blow the world up several times over and the UK account for 1.5% at last count.
No there is not. Let's pretend the chart is correct are there are about 30k nuclear bombs in the world. If each bomb destroys everything within a 1 mile diameter then that would basically be 30K square miles...some bombs are larger and some are smaller. But that is basically 170 x 170 square miles. There are trillions of square miles of surface area in the world. Although that does not help if you are in one of the effected areas. And that does not include Africa. Because that place is a sh*thole anyhow and does not need destroying. A nuke would probably clean the place up.
You need thousands of missiles to deter an attack on any single asset and have them distributed in different areas to ensure survival in the event of a surprise attack. Besides, some missiles may not work, some may miss their target some may get shot down in flight and some targets may need to be hit twice. Redundancy is necessary.
Nuclear weapons are the greatest weapon of peace that has ever been created.
No nation that has possessed them has ever been attacked or invaded.
Probability of a dirty bomb is greater than a nuclear attack and thus a counter nuclear strike is out of the question without knowing who sanctioned it. Then would anyone consider using it to toast millions of people to get one or two?
Yeah, it is. Because the developed nations realize that if you attack us , we attack you. The greatest threat to peace are the loose cannons like Iran and North Korea. And stateless, terrorist organizations like ISIS that want to destroy the West and establish an Islamic Caliphate. Dirty bombs are much cheaper as well. No missiles required. Get some radioactive plutonium and throw it out of a car window in NYC and there goes the stock market, banking industry and comfortable lives of millions of people. Manhattan would be a ghost town and trillions of dollars would be lost in one day.
No brainer. Dump the old school way of conducting war and think of more intelligent and time relevant response strategy.
The stack of paperwork included a letter from a court psychologist who had ruled him a clinical sociopath and not fit for custody. It described him as "immature, self-indulgent, hostile, manipulating others to his own end, and resentful of any situation that requires him to take personal responsibility." It went on for another two pages: "Long-term relationships will tend to be superficial and unsatisfying. Suspiciousness, hostility, and a feeling that he is being mistreated can be expected. In response to increased stress, he is likely to exhibit violent outbursts of tempter and threats of punishment."
Reminds me of somebody . . .
The stack of paperwork included a letter from a court psychologist who had ruled him a clinical sociopath and not fit for custody. It described him as "immature, self-indulgent, hostile, manipulating others to his own end, and resentful of any situation that requires him to take personal responsibility." It went on for another two pages: "Long-term relationships will tend to be superficial and unsatisfying. Suspiciousness, hostility, and a feeling that he is being mistreated can be expected. In response to increased stress, he is likely to exhibit violent outbursts of tempter and threats of punishment."
Reminds me of somebody . . .
Is it possible that that is, probably, all true but that the Republican party think that they can control him? How wrong they may be!
A classic example is that of Hitler. The Germans thought the same. Once in, though, they found out, too late, how wrong they were because he catered to the crowd and led it by the nose until, it, too, realised that it was too late.
Stalin was another one.
All these people are nut cases, but highly dangerous nut cases when in power.