Splitlink said::idea: :idea: I think I have it!
You should have put
Number 3
Come on, zupcon, you can do better than that!
Split
zupcon said:This is yet another example of CYOF and the S Club 7's sloppy thinking
Two numbers dosnt define a sequence
Given 1 and 2 as the starting point we could of course have
1,2,3,4, etc (adding difference between adjacent numbers)
1,2,4,8 (each number doubling the previous),
1,2,3,5,8 (based on fib sequence)
I could go on and on and on and on, just like Mrs Doyle
counter_violent said:Blinkers on , fingers in ears......it's up to you ....
i'm off for a banana
Splitlink said:I hadn't thought of that. I bet CYOF hadn't, either! You are quite right, of course. That's, probably, made a **** up of CYOF's argument.
Split
CYOF said:What in the name of God are you two on about :?:
Can ye not read simple English :?:
Each trader to post nothing only:
Number X
X will be from 1 to 16
So, let us have the first X - PLEASE
It does not get much easier than this
zupcon said:Here we go again, more sloppy thinking from the S Club 7. Since you supplied 1 and 2 I'll propose the following number for X !
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651
Or perhaps you just wanted consecutive integers between 1 and 16. Why oh why cant you make yourself understood, can ye not write, clearly and unambiguously in English.
I fear that yours is the task of meek and unthinking subservience to your puppet masters, or perhaps, ye have just taken too many magic mushrooms.
I have important things to do now, such as drink tea, and there's always time for a nice cup of tea. Sure, didn't the Lord himself pause for a nice cup of tea before giving himself up for the world.
regards
zu
SOCRATES said:Wait a minute....did he not declare he had retired at 30 ?
He is now 39 is he not ?
So what was he doing working for an employer for four years in between ?
And why is it that when approached for a reference...none is offered ?
I thnk it looks very bad for the magazine for them to be taken in with this hedge fund nonsense since his FSA licence has been inactive for a considerable period of time has it not and it looks as if it is currently not valid, so it seems?
And there again, if it is the case, what would the subscribers and advertisers in the magazine make of material which is not true ?
Does this mean therefore information published in the form of articles profiling individuals is not reliable , not factually correct, or not even true ?
Insofar as flying hours is concerned, that could mean anything.
A PPL (Private Pilot's Licence) is awaded when the learner pilot has passed the exams and flown 50 hours, some of them with an instructor and some solo.
92 flying hours means nothing.
Fly 4 times from here to South Africa and back as a passenger ...... .......and you have 92 flying hours to talk about...........but it has nothing to do with being a pilot or flying a plane as a qualified pilot.
CYOF said:I will give you the benefit of the doubt, this time only, mind you.
In order for me to post something of value to the readers, there must be at least 16 interested traders, or investors, or viewers, or T2W members :idea:
This is no game - as you may think - but I have now made it CLEAR, hopefully
Slainte,
CYOF said:In order for me to post something of value to the readers, there must be at least 16 interested traders, or investors, or viewers, or T2W members
Slainte,
counter_violent said:There's a first time for everything I suppose.
zupcon said:Oh my god, had I known that posting a number would be taken as an expression of interest in one of your masters works, I surely would have abstained. I dont wish to remove the posts, as they provide a clear indication of your inability to think correctly, but please, dont take them as an expression of interest I beg of you.
regards
zu
Splitlink said:Hoe long do you think it will before the other 13 contribute? I'm dying to get to the next stage.
Lightning McQueen said:Count me in then, I'll enroll...um what number are we up to I'm lost already
5 ( im counting C_V as number 4 here)
Not much of a stampede of lightseekers yet.
Lightning McQueen said:Count me in then, I'll enroll...um what number are we up to I'm lost already
5 ( im counting C_V as number 4 here)
Not much of a stampede of lightseekers yet.
trendie said:1 CYOF
2 Counter_Violent
3 Splitlink
4 zupcon
5 Lightning McQueen
6 trendie
Oh go on then.
One more and we will have enough to protect a mexican village from marauding banditos.
trendie said:1 CYOF
2 Counter_Violent
3 Splitlink
4 zupcon
5 Lightning McQueen
6 trendie
Oh go on then.
One more and we will have enough to protect a mexican village from marauding banditos.
ian said:Can I be 'Vin'?