ivorm said:I'm not sure about the efficacy of this strategy either.
I guess my thinking is that altough they are 'basically the same trade', nevertheless they differ in terms of volatility, i.e. the CHF seems to move much more than the EUR. I'm not sure of the maths, but it seems to me that this difference in volatility might mean that trading the pair might be more profitable than trading just one.
I know it's a very limited sample :cheesy: but my two days of trading both currencies have resulted in +115. If I had just traded EUR, it would be +79. And if I had just traded CHF, then it would be +36.
Anyone care to do some proper backtesting on this ? Could be interesting.
Regards,
ivorm said:.
I know it's a very limited sample :cheesy: but my two days of trading both currencies have resulted in +115. If I had just traded EUR, it would be +79. And if I had just traded CHF, then it would be +36.
Anyone care to do some proper back testing on this ? Could be interesting.
Regards,
Goober said:ivorm
Remember that you must double up on an individual pair to compare apples with apples (excuse the pun :cheesy: )
In other words, you would have made +158 pips on EUR or +72 pips on Swissy.
Hope this clarifies.
Goober said:Swissy long activated at 1.2885.
ivorm
Earlier I asked TW if he was trading live or on paper because his net profit of 123 pips was based on trading four pairs, which translates to a potential DD for the day of 240 pips.
Same question to you really.
Goober said:ivorm
Quite right. There's nothing wrong with spreading the risk - good risk management i.m.h.o.
I select either EUR or Swissy based on the volatility filter.
Mr Chill said:I see ,Goober you may have stummbled on something here maybe better to only trade one pair for obvious reasons , but choses the pair with the tightest range before breakout , what do you think :?: