That's a falsehood to put it mildly, I have seen the losses with my eyes.
Also, if one is trying to ' prove ' he is a net winner then everyone knows that posting random tiny wins don't mean anything, some sort of official statement is need that:
1) shows starting risk capital, closing risk capital, and showing changes to capital, withdrawals.
2) trading consistently over a sustained period up to 2 years.
3) Return : risk of 2:1 or greater
4) Allied to above decent size: at least 3-5ppp.
Otherwise anything else is non serious.
This then shows itself up as constant trollering without contributing anything apart form the usual bs of showing us tiny winners and a few losers too, berating other posters and generally destroying threads to the point where him and his cronies are the only people posting. Frankly it looks like a sad attempt to pump up one's flagging ego.
That is why some people say T2W is dying. Sorry about the rant but there you go.
Also, if one is trying to ' prove ' he is a net winner then everyone knows that posting random tiny wins don't mean anything, some sort of official statement is need that:
1) shows starting risk capital, closing risk capital, and showing changes to capital, withdrawals.
2) trading consistently over a sustained period up to 2 years.
3) Return : risk of 2:1 or greater
4) Allied to above decent size: at least 3-5ppp.
Otherwise anything else is non serious.
This then shows itself up as constant trollering without contributing anything apart form the usual bs of showing us tiny winners and a few losers too, berating other posters and generally destroying threads to the point where him and his cronies are the only people posting. Frankly it looks like a sad attempt to pump up one's flagging ego.
That is why some people say T2W is dying. Sorry about the rant but there you go.