TheBramble
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,394
- Likes
- 1,170
I've always been in absolute awe of those who can 'see' the basic TA constructs on a chart. I'm a very visual person so expected to be able to easily interpret such things, but it completely passes me by.
The H&S you refer to I presume is the most recent data. Why couldn't it also be/have been a double-top?
There was also a post yesterday with Elliot Waves marked on it showing the 5-wave. With my complete lack of expertise I could have chosen at least half a dozen (I'm not kidding) other places where a 5-Elliot wave could have been plotted.
TA may be an art and a science. The indicators obviously tend to the latter, but clearly, these formations are very much in the former camp.
Anyone else (who is now proficient in reading charts) start off similarly hampered? If so, how did you train yourself to recognise the 'standards' of TA from these amorphous collections of points?
The H&S you refer to I presume is the most recent data. Why couldn't it also be/have been a double-top?
There was also a post yesterday with Elliot Waves marked on it showing the 5-wave. With my complete lack of expertise I could have chosen at least half a dozen (I'm not kidding) other places where a 5-Elliot wave could have been plotted.
TA may be an art and a science. The indicators obviously tend to the latter, but clearly, these formations are very much in the former camp.
Anyone else (who is now proficient in reading charts) start off similarly hampered? If so, how did you train yourself to recognise the 'standards' of TA from these amorphous collections of points?