Chartman,
FTSE Beater pointed out y'day that mug is using T2W to advertise a paid service and that's against the rules
He is not charging yet for this service, but has notified us all that he intends to in March/April.- As far as I understand the situation
I asked FTSE Beater if I would be allowed the same freedom. p'haps he has'nt seen the post but I'd be interested to get a reply [the post was at 2:16 pm today]
I can't answer for FTSE ,but we have to try and deal with a fair hand. Sometimes it's very hard, sometimes it's very easy. You may well find that if you proffered a similar scenario, that you would be allowed to post....
why do we need to "settle this thread and see what happens" ? after 4 days of posts we've established that mug has misrepresented himself and that even if he is not yet in breach of FSA rules he soon will be.
Perhaps that is a matter best left for the FSA, if they are interested.By settle, perhaps I meant 'calm down'
Y'day Blairlogie wrote this............."if I was a T2W administrator I would scrap the entire thread. I am surprised that you are complicit in such activity"
That is probably why Blairlogie is not an admisnistrator.... There are, maybe, other reasons that we would perhaps not take on board too seriously what he has posted.
Why is T2W complicit in this obvious fraud ?
We have been down this road before. Do you actually have proof that fraud has been comitted? Making such a serious allegation without proof is a very seriou matter in itself.
Chartman has inserted all comments in italics so that they are kept intact with the post.