Thats a totally unfair critisism, and whilst the standard of site content is in decline, its at least reassuring to note that the standard of hypocrisy from moderators remains as high as it ever was. 😆
You know very well that reporting vendors is a completely pointless exercise. The ongoing (although now resolved) situation with Grey1 was a fantastic example of a vendor being reported, and those reports being ignored by the moderation team.
There are currently at least two very popular threads run by unbadged vendors, I've certainly pointed out who they are, the URL of their commercial site, domain registration details, and examples of open solicitation for business on this and other sites. Its clear that T2W see's their input as "content", and is prepared to turn a blind eye.
I personally have no problem with vendors being allowed to flaunt site guidelines, but its a tad hypocritical when moderators publically critisise members for not participating in a system thats commonly known to be non functioning. What incentive is there for anyone to waste their time pointing out that a vendor is in breach of forum rules when they'll just be completely ignored ? , its far more fun, and far more effective to call out the vendor in public. FFS bitching about vendors is about the only content anyone posts these days, remove that, and the site dead !