I know we were all split on whether or not it was valid. I just happened to come across this chart while reviewing this evening. Is Volman's example saying that the ARB is risky because of the approaching 40 level in the absence of a ceiling test? Here's a scenario I'm wondering about: Would it still be aggressive if it had 40 level support but no ceiling test?
Hi Samich,
I agree with your logics. Considering the strength of trends and the amount of follow-through recently, every 20 level may represent a serious resistance on the way to the target. That's why looking for setups with proper buildup and, as in this case, test of previous support levels seems to be the most prudent approach at the moment. In my opinion having 20 level as a support would meet the requirement of a successful retest.