Lightning McQueen
Moderator
- Messages
- 4,992
- Likes
- 827
what would be good if the current worldspreads story was merged into 1 thread, pain in the **** trying to follow it all day on several threads
oh, mixing client funds with their own only a small irregularity then.
...and only a small hole in their accounts, nothing to panic about either.
"The London-listed company allegedly mixed client funds with its own, allegedly leaving a substantial shortfall that is unlikely to be met from its cash reserves. The suspected shortfall in the client accounts is estimated to be £10m-£12m, says one person close to the situation."
Worldspreads finds accounts irregularities - FT.com
if i had anything other than small amounts deposited across spread betting accounts. i'd def be setting about the task of getting ready to close any open positions and pruning drastically amounts on deposit sunday night/monday morning from all of them.
My point was this looks like a fraud - company specific.. MF Global running into trouble didn't cause a run on all brokerages - not down playing the serious nature of this issue at all but is it the end of spread betting ? - Id be asking more questions from Ernst & Young, who signed off the accounts.
oh, mixing client funds with their own only a small irregularity then.
...and only a small hole in their accounts, nothing to panic about either.
"The London-listed company allegedly mixed client funds with its own, allegedly leaving a substantial shortfall that is unlikely to be met from its cash reserves. The suspected shortfall in the client accounts is estimated to be £10m-£12m, says one person close to the situation."
Worldspreads finds accounts irregularities - FT.com
if i had anything other than small amounts deposited across spread betting accounts. i'd def be setting about the task of getting ready to close any open positions and pruning drastically amounts on deposit sunday night/monday morning from all of them.
It all started a few years back when a company known as CMC markets came onto the block and started heavily advertising. Their profits were off the charts and they receive huge amounts of investment.
They subsequently listed and received investment from Goldman Sachs and a number of other large banks/funds.
However no sooner was this done than the FSA found out about positions not being hedged companies making huge amounts of money by purposely mis-quotings prices etc... CMC Markets de-listed, goldmans made a huge loss and their reputation was in tatters.
In regards to CMC, yes they have changed because if they hadn't they wouldn't have survived.
A lot of people go around these days trying to blight the reputations of brokers forums like this and FPA do harbour more "angry traders" rather than genuine cases of dodgy goings on.
I do trade now and again and the first this I would look for in a broker these days would be longevity.
Look for a company that has been around for at least 7-8 years. Any company other than this is most likely running huge net losses due to ridiculously high marketing budgets.
An example of a company like that is FX Pro.
They look really good on the eye, they sponsor 2 major football teams in the UK spending millions of pounds yet the only reason they survive is because they have a millionaire backer. The same is the case with all the other new brokers...
If you guys watch any bloomberg ads these days you will see that loads of companies promote "no dealing desk" or "STP" (straight through processing) because it gives you guys the trader, the confidence that your trades won't be meddled with however the real cruz of the scenario is that really non of your trades go into the market place. The broker decides what to place and what not to... The easiest way to get around this and be 100% secure is just don't use a regular broker. Go with a bluechip company like aka a huge back that has a retail FX division. In the UK the 2 major ones are Barclays FX and also Societe Generale FX. Go with them if you want no hassle.