Fundamental Analysis UK Housing Boom – Is the Party Over?

Recently the IMF said that the UK's property was overvalued and this could result in a spectacular slump. House prices in the US have slowed down considerably since 2005.

The UK avoided the Recession in 2001 when many countries went into deep recession. Post 9/11 the UK interest rates were at the lowest for many decades, this resulted in a boom in the UK housing market as the cost of mortgages was at its lowest. The low cost of borrowing also saw a boom in the buy to let market with many investors having a big portfolio of properties.

Not only was the UK government on a spending spree but also the UK consumer, due to the easy availability of credit. Currently the UK personal debt level has exceeded more than £1 trillion. It is expected that we could see a significant rise in insolvencies during 2008. The "time bomb" is ticking and could explode at any time; it could be triggered by any of the shocks to the economy. The Northern Rock fiasco was just the first such trigger, which resulted in savers withdrawing over £14 billion from the ailing Rock - no doubt the next 12 months we will witness more such triggers, which will dent overall consumer confidence. This could eventually lead to a big fall in the house prices.

Many "experts" feel that 2008 could see further rises in house prices, and some optimistic forecast has been put at over a 10% increase. Housing demand is influenced by the "feel good factor" resulting into the expectation that the house prices will continue to rise. Some of the reasons for a boom in house prices are;
  • Cheap mortgage rates post 9/11
  • Availability of easy credit
  • Speculation of ongoing price increases
  • Buy to let investors having large portfolio of properties
  • Amateur investors now joining the buy to let bandwagon

The worrying part is when amateur investors join the party; it's likely that we may have seen the peak! One can see similarities with the technology stock boom of 2000. Many investors bought at the peak and after several years they have yet to recoup their losses.

The past year has seen many amateur investors venture into the buy to let market for the first time. This has meant that they have had to buy at the peak, with the mortgage rates almost doubling in the past 5 years.

Currently prices are being supported by the expectations that they will continue to rise, and when this increase fails to materialise the bubble could burst. The house price inflation has been at its fastest this decade as can be seen from the following graph; and since 1995 we have not seen a dip in prices, it has just gone up in one straight line!

Image1-127.jpg


In addition, there are other serious issues with the economy which could trigger a sharp correction, not only in house prices but also the stock market. Some of the disturbing triggers will be;</span />
  • Lenders offering loans of up to 5 times multiples to salary, thus borrowers are overstretching themselves.</span />
  • Increases in mortgage rates have yet to have an impact and often this takes time to react. The mortgage rates have nearly doubled since 2002.</span />
  • Nearly 1 million Britons now own a second home, often as a buy to let investment. When the downturn in economy comes, panic is likely to set in amongst the buy to let investors, which would result in the market being flooded with house for sale.
  • The US sub-prime mortgage crisis also poses more risks for the UK's banking system. In the US the crisis has lead to plunging property prices, creating a loss of consumer confidence with billions of dollars in loss.
  • UK Job prospects are worsening, with many economist predicting unemployment to rise to 1.8 million+. The banking & financial sector has been a big driver for employment growth. Many firms in the housing market; this could result into deteriorating earnings and leading to staff cutbacks.
  • Consumer spending could see a slow down when faced with deteriorating economic and job conditions. Once again this would affect consumer spending, thus lower earnings.
  • Inflationary pressures are driven by high commodity prices, as demand from emerging economies like India and China continue to increase. This not only has an impact on the monetary policies like the interest rates but will have significant impact on earnings, which could lead to a big fall in stock market.

Buy-to-let bubble:
Is the party over? So far the landlords have had it easy, the cheap mortgage rates ensured that the rent covered the mortgage repayments and they benefited from the significant capital appreciation of their portfolio. It surely has been the best investment strategy for the past decade, as many investors have made fortunes and many have "retired" young.

Currently it is estimated that there are over a million buy to let mortgages, and landlords are now feeling the pinch. Past 2 years has seen significant rise in mortgage repayments and we are now seeing signs of price increase slowing down. The rents have not kept pace with outgoings, thus landlord profits have gone down. In some cases landlords are losing on their portfolio. Some areas in the UK have seen an oversupply of buy to let properties resulting into falling yields.

Although year on year prices rose by nearly 5% to December 2007, but the house prices fell for a second consecutive month in December according to Nationwide building society. New mortgages on a buy to let are also slowing, with many lenders now seeking up to 30% deposit and also a requirement that the rent on the property equates to 125% of monthly mortgage payment.

Unless the investor has a larger deposit the rental yield may be insufficient to cover the cost of the mortgage and with no expectations of a capital growth, you are likely to see significant drop in the buy-to-let mortgages. This could even result in many existing landlords starting to liquidate their portfolios. The only incentive to retain portfolios is the expectation of further capital gains. If this expectation evaporates and with falling yield, then there would be no point in buy to let investments.

Newer entrants to the buy to let market could soon face going into negative equity as soon as we start seeing declines in the prices. Furthermore, should the banks suffer to the extent of the housing bust, the fallout would be astronomical!

Changes to the Capital Gains could also contribute to the housing crash. The tax on property gains has been cut from 40% to 18% effective from 1st April 2008. So those investors who are sitting on fat profits would be tempted to lock in gains and also benefit from the lower tax.

Housing Repossessions
2007 has seen a significant rise in home repossessions, and it is expected that this figure will increase considerably in 2008. Rising property repossessions normally spell bad news for the property market creating a supply of houses, which are normally sold below market prices and this can dent confidence.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) has warned that the number of home repossessions is set to soar to levels not seen since the housing crash of the 1990s. It is also expected that there will be an increase in mortgage repayment arrears in the coming year.

Having said that, the current situation is very different from the 1990s. Firstly in the 90s interest rates were very high and peaked at 16%. We are probably unlikely to see huge scale cases of negative equity like we had in the 90s, due to the huge equity homeowners are sitting on at the moment.

What to do - Action Points?
  • If you are a homeowner and if you are contemplating selling your home, then the time to act is now,given that sharp falls may just be round the corner unless the government can delay the inevitable by aggressive reduction of interest rates.
  • Cash is king - with so much uncertainty, undoubtedly cash is king. Fixed interest and government bonds are increasingly becoming popular.
  • Stock market investment - Although we have seen healthy gains in the markets worldwide, longer term it offers good opportunity. Many analysts are calling for sharp falls in the markets and this should provide a good opportunity of bargain hunting. Emerging markets should also offer a good opportunity in the event of a market correction.

Conclusion
Just as in year 2000, when we saw the NASDAQ stock market boom, we are now seeing some similarities - irrational exuberance in the housing market.

During the NASDAQ boom, we saw many amateur investors jump into the market at the peak, we are now experiencing a similar situation. Many amateur investors are jumping into the buy to let market.

As with all market activity, prices do not go up in one straight line and you will always have price retracement, the question is how big the retracement will be? There is no doubt that a significant house price correction is on the cards, the only question remains is when? It is a case of any one of the triggers to set in - as soon as the first domino falls, panic will set in resulting into significant declines in house prices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely no chance at all of Labour being re-elected in my view.


Paul

Under Gordo - agree. But keep an eye on Mandy. Perhaps lab's only chance (and a very slim one) is to dump Gordo and get someone else in. If the opportunity arises, Mandy will move faster than greased weaselsh!t. The fact that he's not an elected MP will not stop him (Gordo's an unelected PM isn't he?).

Would I put any money on Lab winning the election? - Is the Pope gonna convert to C of E :LOL:
 
Under Gordo - agree. But keep an eye on Mandy

Still no chance in my view. The last polls said that even under a different leader it would make no difference. Also people always vote on how they feel economically and they don't really care about wars that don't affect them or any other things that they should do. We will also be getting a least another year of layoffs, mortgage arrears and general debt with up to 3.8 million in negative equity. People will blame the government for this and Labour cannot recover enough in time before the next election.

In my view Labour will be lucky to get 100 seats at the next election.


Paul
 
Tories all the way next election... They'll leave us in the sh*t again. Won't hit us for 10 yrs so they look great for a while but it's gonna be the same old story over and over agin. Hopefully I'll be trading full time then so I won't care lol.
 
Mandy?
He wouldn't even get enough votes from his own party; he's detested by rank and file members, unions, MPs, everybody.
 
Mandy?
He wouldn't even get enough votes from his own party; he's detested by rank and file members, unions, MPs, everybody.


......He may whatever he may be....But like Dracula...his party has consistently 'regenerated' him and sought his services when in **** hole.....

.....He does win elections for his party....He is a very cunning and effective operator....

I will not write him off.......Parhaps famous last words from me that will come back to haunt me.......

Talking about which party....UK has a 'ding dong' party system......If party in power is in bog mire, elect the other one.....and when that other goes in bog mire elect the first one.....

And people will consistently, keep losing the Public Services, Pensions, NH, Education....etc along the way...regardless of which party is in power....

No party is EVER going to give electorate MORE than the previous one....!!

It is very easy to brain wash the electorate.......
 
Tories all the way next election... They'll leave us in the sh*t again. Won't hit us for 10 yrs so they look great for a while but it's gonna be the same old story over and over agin.

So what's the difference between them and New labour?

New labour to many (but not me) looked great for a while and now they leave us in the ****...........

PS. If you know anything about the economy you'll know that the Tories left a pretty good one for labour in 1998.
 
Mate as long as Murdoch keeps slating him in the tabloids and in the news after I'm a celebrity he's going nowhere. Same can be said for every individual and/or party.

The best news stories are the ones like "David Cameron -Brown has ruined the economy".
 
So what's the difference between them and New labour?

New labour to many (but not me) looked great for a while and now they leave us in the ****...........

PS. If you know anything about the economy you'll know that the Tories left a pretty good one for labour in 1998.


Really? You are aware that Macroeconomics doent really work on, nor can it be measured in an annual basis.

What the Tories did up until 98 equates to not paying any bills and saving all of your wages in the bank.

Public spending was cut to ridiculous levels. This is why we have so many "regeneration" schemes now and the ONLY WAY TO FUND THEM is by bringing in outside commercial development by offering GRANTS OR TAX CUTS to the companies. Labour is trying to raise the standard of living of the poorer people but problem is they're too stupid to realise that even though they now have more money, they arent footballers and started getting buying all sorts from these regenerated shopping malls or *insert generic method of pop-culture consumerism* on credit.

The banks post rediculous profits which are fake...people take huge bonuses and pensions... the huge companies pay no tax... and they're all friends with... guess who... THE TORIES!!!! Whoooo.

Anyone who underestimated the cunning and malice of this bunch of elitist ponces who've been rich and well educated for generations is a fool.
 
Last edited:
Mandy?
He wouldn't even get enough votes from his own party; he's detested by rank and file members, unions, MPs, everybody.

Yes, come to think about it that's right. Perhaps I was attributing too much Darth-Vader similarity to the Prince of Darkness.

I wonder who else would fancy their chances or is willing to knife Gordo?
 
Taking over before the election is a poisoned chalice only fit for someone on the brink of retiring.
I knew Jack Straw in my student days and he was a man of straw then. Over-rated prat.
 
Taking over before the election is a poisoned chalice only fit for someone on the brink of retiring.
I knew Jack Straw in my student days and he was a man of straw then. Over-rated prat.


Milliband for next party leader... He'll take a pay-off from the tories and go down in the 1st round.
 
The banks post rediculous profits which are fake...people take huge bonuses and pensions... the huge companies pay no tax... and they're all friends with... guess who... THE TORIES!!!! Whoooo.

And Labour, especially Blair didn't suck up to anyone that was rich, including the now infamous bankers.

Big companies, big bankers, big anyone with money tries to be friends with anyone in power, it's only good business.

PS. One question that everyone has to answer WITHOUT being a hypocrite is -

'if you were in the bankers shoes during the last 10 years would you have done anything different? Or would your face have been so far in the trough, like everyone else's that you could hardly see any hair?'

This is what makes me always laugh about all the wingers and whining 'hang the bankers' mob. Most, if they're honest with themselves are just jealous and if they had the opportunity to be in the same shoes they'd be LOVING all that cash :)

I know I would which is why I actually like how the bankers have pulled this scam off and are sticking 2 figures up at the rest of the country. And before anyone trashes me, think very hard about the question above and please don't lie.............
 
And Labour, especially Blair didn't suck up to anyone that was rich, including the now infamous bankers.

Big companies, big bankers, big anyone with money tries to be friends with anyone in power, it's only good business.

PS. One question that everyone has to answer WITHOUT being a hypocrite is -

'if you were in the bankers shoes during the last 10 years would you have done anything different? Or would your face have been so far in the trough, like everyone else's that you could hardly see any hair?'

This is what makes me always laugh about all the wingers and whining 'hang the bankers' mob. Most, if they're honest with themselves are just jealous and if they had the opportunity to be in the same shoes they'd be LOVING all that cash :)

I know I would which is why I actually like how the bankers have pulled this scam off and are sticking 2 figures up at the rest of the country. And before anyone trashes me, think very hard about the question above and please don't lie.............


I never slagged banks off once. Why would I be on this website if I didnt like banking? I had an interview with Citi a few months ago lol. I said tories allowed this to happen.

Life isn't black and white mate you need to get out of this habit of generalizing people by grouping them into tabloid concocted buzz-word phrases
 
And Labour, especially Blair didn't suck up to anyone that was rich, including the now infamous bankers.

Big companies, big bankers, big anyone with money tries to be friends with anyone in power, it's only good business.

PS. One question that everyone has to answer WITHOUT being a hypocrite is -

'if you were in the bankers shoes during the last 10 years would you have done anything different? Or would your face have been so far in the trough, like everyone else's that you could hardly see any hair?'

This is what makes me always laugh about all the wingers and whining 'hang the bankers' mob. Most, if they're honest with themselves are just jealous and if they had the opportunity to be in the same shoes they'd be LOVING all that cash :)

I know I would which is why I actually like how the bankers have pulled this scam off and are sticking 2 figures up at the rest of the country. And before anyone trashes me, think very hard about the question above and please don't lie.............


Arrogant fools think they are indistructable.

Similar to Lloyds' of London when the City relocates to Amsterdam or Frankfurt along with big money and business all those bankers can reflect on where their shiite offspring can go to find ready made jobs.

No national pride or altruism left to build a greater business.

The reputation of the city is at stake here and these bankers are bitching about jealousy along with politicians trying to save their expenses... :LOL:

That's funny!!!

We'll let the future tell the story.

Thatcher messed up and took approx 20 years for the results to come through.

With the City's reputation in tatters let's see where we all end up in another 20 years. :eek:
 
Last edited:
I think the best option would be to expand credit unions for savings and post office accounts for dd's etc and suffocate banks for a while. All the vampires will jump ship into another sector. They wield to much economic influence. They create too much wealth. It's not even good for the government.
 
Top