rols
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,621
- Likes
- 336
True.
I can't wait for the brewing housing market crash, when they decide to well & truly pull the plug, and houses are available at rock bottom prices :!:
Dream on....
True.
I can't wait for the brewing housing market crash, when they decide to well & truly pull the plug, and houses are available at rock bottom prices :!:
Dream on....
Dream on....
No Income, No Job, No Assets! Dole bludgers in expensive houses with big televisions and fast cars. Buy Now, Taxpayer Pays Later!
I am really resentful of the moral hazard created by the government bailing out the reckless speculators at the Rock. Now we have a situation where bankers can gamble half the customer deposits on risky trades - if they win, they are a hero and get an 8 figure bonus - if they lose, the taxpayer can bail them out.
Hi LL, you definately have a point and correct in what you suggest but I think not doing anything would have been a lot worse than a gentle softly softly approach. Whilst NR maybe covered I doubt the BoE or the taxpayers can extend support to bail out every riskpro exec or company...
They could start by demoting the financial controllers and executives of failing companies, withdraw their pension schemes, take away their bonuses and share option schemes (oops... we'll let them keep their share options...) and get them to start in the post room delivering bad news...
What was those contraptions called in the bad old days where they would lock you into two planks with your hands and head sticking out?
Anyway, stick the management in front of various branches and let the public loose with tomatoes. At least you'll get some entertainment value... :cheesy:
HIPS will probably cause prices to rise because they have reduced available supply by up to 30% according to a number of sources. Apparently 30% of the available market is made up of people who will put their house on the market just for interest or because they may wish to move up the street a bit. But when you have to fork out hundreds for a time limited load of nonsense that is of no value whatsoever, then these very people just cannot be bothered.
This has to be one of the most stupid ill thought out pieces of legislation ever having ignored all experts and stakeholders in the industry.
Paul
I think that if HIPS had become what they were originally intentioned for then it would have been fine. They were supposed to be the equivalent of a survey and in that case I would agree that they would be a great idea. Mainly because a buyer would not have to pay for a survey and the emphasis is on the seller. It would also have still catered for the 30% speculative area as the survey would not be time limited in the same way as I understand that HIPS are. If you actually go ahead and read them they are of very limited use in my view and just more red tape to the selling process.
Personally I will benefit from HIPS causing the reduction in available supply because I have more than one property and as such I think prices will rise which is all to my benefit. It doesn't alter the fact that all those involved in the industry were against them and that has to be important as they are the experts.
Paul
But demand being to what extent driven by potential buyers’ perceptions of future value and the ability of entry level buyers to purchase?In my view this will all come down to supply and demand.