Fundamental Analysis What Next for U.K. House Prices?

In 2008 I wrote an article for T2W entitled: Housing Boom – is the party over? in which I categorically stated that I expected house prices to fall substantially and that investors should look to invest in the stock market from 2008 onwards. I was right on both counts. House prices in some areas have dropped as much as 25%, while the average stock market index has nearly doubled.

After a decade long boom due to lower interest rates and easy lending, the party finally came to a sticky end for U.K. property prices in 2009. According to Land Registry, property prices in the U.K. rose by an astronomical 200% in a decade.

Five years on, I find it difficult to make a case for increases in house prices in the U.K. based on numerous factors. To start with, the major U.K. banks are effectively owned by the governments, and they are not much more secure now than they were a few years ago. In addition to that, to balance the books, we have had the austerity measures and cut in benefits which could affect general confidence levels.

Admittedly, in 2008 I was expecting a much bigger fall than what we have seen so far! Housing prices in the U.K. have been propped up by the following measures:

  1. Low interest rates meaning that many are able to afford the monthly repayments despite decreases in overall household incomes.
  2. Low rates are keeping ‘forced sellers’ to a minimum as, despite the recession, we have not seen big jumps in repossessions - unlike in previous recessions.
  3. There has been an increase in house buying under shared equity schemes.
  4. Government mortgage guarantee schemes have helped to boost the housing market.
  5. The Euro zone crisis has meant that many wealthy foreigners have been buying homes in the U.K.

So, what are the big stumbling blocks preventing the property market from increasing substantially from now on?

  1. A crackdown on interest only mortgages.
  2. A requirement for higher deposits.
  3. Austerity measures, which could lead to uncertainty in the markets, as well as fear within households, resulting in them not wanting not to spend.
  4. Potential increases in unemployment.
  5. The Euro zone crisis.

In addition to the above, the number of Buy to Let mortgages has been gradually increasing as landlords are cashing in on rising rental income, as well as no sign of mortgage rates increasing in the near future. The low interest rates over the last few years has meant that Buy to Let investors have made substantial profits, many to the tune of millions of pounds, as they snap up properties coming into the market at the expense of first time buyers.

What is ironic is that the government is helping these investors by way of low interest rates, and then also paying them a good return in the form of rents via housing benefit payments to tenants. The current cost of housing benefits to the government is well over £20 billion each year. Local councils simply have no houses left in their portfolio!

Some of the blunders of past government policies, both Conservative and Labour, include selling off gold reserves when it was around $200 and also selling council houses at ridiculously low prices. This has meant that the government has incurred substantial losses from the sale of these assets. Housing is the biggest loss, both in terms of not having those assets on the balance sheets (there were many instances of people buying homes at, say, £30,000 and now these houses are worth over £500,000), and now having to pay substantial amounts in housing benefits!

Despite the fall in house prices in the past 5 years and slow increase in salaries, there is still a mismatch between earnings and house prices and the government is simply not doing enough for first time buyers.

As mentioned before, Buy to Let investors have replaced first time buyers as they are snapping up the properties which come to the market, but for how long? Interest rates cannot remain at these levels and, despite the current economic problems, the move can only be up in the years to come. And, if the rental yields do not keep pace with cost increases, then we can expect a big crash, as there will be major panic amongst Buy to Let investors, many of whom are sitting on big portfolios.

To kick-start the housing market, we need to see an influx of first time buyers, and for that to happen we need to see a fall of at least another 15% in house prices. However, given the extent of the government intervention in the market to prop up the prices, it can be difficult to predict when the next fall will occur.

My opinion on the housing market is do not be fooled. After some stability this year and in 2014, prices are likely to increase, maybe even to double digits. But from 2015/16 onwards, I believe house prices will fall again, and I would not be at all surprised if we see a recession from 2020 onwards.

Governments cannot prop up prices for long, Quantitative easing (QE) has to end some day. So, what will happen when the money taps are turned off without a booming economy in place with low unemployment levels? All they are doing is delaying the inevitable. Eventually, market forces will take over and the landing will be very hard! Very hard indeed!

So be warned!

Jay Lakhani can be contacted at 4x4u.net
 
Last edited by a moderator:
London prices are rising at 10% and since the low of 2009 it has risen by 40%.
Equally estate agents are saying that new buyers volume has surged by +50% in the past 12 months.

All this is at the back of the Government's Help to Buy schemes and promises of low interest rates till 2016. This has meant that the previous bubble was not fully deflated, and this second phase of housing boom is underway. Prices are clearly running away, and could have disastrous consequences for many, whose timing into the housing market is wrong.

Most financial crisis are caused by government meddling

To quote from a famous song with ref to house prices in the SE of England 'the only way is up baby, for you and me now'. Its a shame for the younger generations who will not get the chance to buy a home (not a house) for 3 times their income.

They also have the pleasure of the following which the baby boomers didnt have;

1. No more gold plated pensions
2. No free education plus a large number of them duped into pointless expensive degrees eg. Film studies should NOT be a degree its a hobby FFS.

The good news is their prospects are still very good compared to most other countries in the world. Everything is here to have a good affluent life in the UK if someone is willing to work hard and make the right choices. :smart:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To quote from a famous song with ref to house prices in the SE of England 'the only way is up baby, for you and me now'. Its a shame for the younger generations who will not get the chance to buy a home (not a house) for 3 times their income.

They also have the pleasure of the following which the baby boomers didnt have;

1. No more gold plated pensions
2. No free education plus a large number of them duped into pointless expensive degrees eg. Film studies should NOT be a degree its a hobby FFS.

The good news is their prospects are still very good compared to most other countries in the world. Everything is here to have a good affluent life in the UK if someone is willing to work hard and make the right choices. :smart:


I agree with perspective but not saying or suggesting it is good or right. Just life and if one doesn't participate and keep up one simply gets left behind.

I'm all into low cost living and off-grid eco construction. Home shouldn't cost more than £50K imho. Simply that land is so damn expensive because of daft planning laws and permitted developments rule.
 
I agree with perspective but not saying or suggesting it is good or right. Just life and if one doesn't participate and keep up one simply gets left behind.

I'm all into low cost living and off-grid eco construction. Home shouldn't cost more than £50K imho. Simply that land is so damn expensive because of daft planning laws and permitted developments rule.

houses should be a lot cheaper yes but unfortunately for the last 15 years or so it has been a big game of 'ponzi chicken' where you get punished if you dont take part. At the moment its a case of buy and hold onto any real assets you have, that has been the game for sometime now. asset price inflation has been here for sometime and it is staying as it is the only tried and tested way sovereign debt can be dealt with. :smart:

the best investment I have had in the last 5 years has been a property in an emerging market. Huge capital growth plus relative dollar weakness against EM currency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There we go again............... House prices rising at a fast pace!

Successive governments have messed up the housing market by meddling with it!
It began with Thatcher. Her "make everyone a home owner" had - as she knew full well - a sinister side. Working people lost the right to council homes for life and from then on, with a mortgage, had to do exactly what their bosses told them. She chained working people whilst smiling at them.
But she isn't the only one to blame. What on earth were so-called Labour governments doing clinging onto her grim legacy? Why on earth didn't they build, build build? They had the majority. The public wanted it and needed it.
They were no more Labour (ie left wing) than John Major's government.
Now this shower of ****. Deliberately inflating the house price bubble in order to create a 'feel good' factor. They care nothing about the country, nothing about the peoplel. They just care about being in power. Just like New Labour and Thatcher.
No wonder people turn to delusional rubbish like UKIP - who are, as it happens, more Thatcherite than the current Tory party, as so totally the wrong direction for the country to go - successive governments haven't given a damn about the majority of their own ****in electorates!
 
NEED to overhaul the BTL tax laws, currently Tax payers are funding property profits:

Buy-to-let landlords' profits artificially boosted by 'upper middle-class perk' of tax breaks that cost us £5bn a year
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/m...
And the amount of tax not paid is massively understated, especially as no CGT on main residences and the changing names that goes on, and that many non-residents are exempt entirely from CGT on UK housing, and that most gains are withdrawal by mortgage equity withdrawal, and that it is tenants not landlords who pay council tax:
""Buy-to-let landlords are artificially boosted by tax breaks that deliver a taxpayer subsidy of up to £5.2bn for their investments, a new report has claimed. The long-standing ability to offset mortgage interest payments and wear and tear against income tax bills on rent, combined with the loopholes that allow many to avoid paying capital gains tax, have been branded an ‘upper middle-class perk’ by an Intergenerational Foundation report. Ed Howker, of the campaign group, said: ‘Britain has spent more than a decade encouraging a form of housing investment that builds very few new homes, rinses the taxman, raises the cost of housing and prices-out first-time buyers"
"The situation is doubly unfair, according to the report’s authors, as much of the benefits from buy-to-let tax breaks go to an older, wealthier generation that has already reaped large gains from high house price inflation. In addition, the system has further pushed up house prices, disadvantaged first-time buyers and families attempting to move up the property ladder and led to the building of too many flats rather than the houses owner occupiers want and Britain needs, report author David Kingman argues. It said that justifying bumper tax breaks for buy-to-let landlords on the basis that they are running a business was flawed and it should actually be classified as an investment. The reported added that HMRC even ‘classifies rent as unearned income’, delivering a basis for this change"
He said: ‘Economically, buy-to-let investors should not imagine they are small-business owners. They are much less useful to the economy, rarely employing anyone who would not be employed by owner-occupiers to service their homes and deriving their income from gambling on house price rises. ‘Simply because these speculations have, in recent years, paid off does not make them the work of proper business."’ [End quote]
And landlords are lent mortgages that they cannot repay capital and interest out of earned income (they rely on rents from others), on an interest only basis and get a tax deduction for that interest. And at artificially low interest rates off the back of funding for lending etc which should have been used to lend to productive businesses instead. And leading to 1.4 trillion in private sector debt (excluding btl mortgages) relating mainly to pyramid scheme mortgages for rabbit hutches.
What is needed is an annual property tax, and CGT to be charged at the earlier of mortgage equity withdrawal and sale - and tax to apply to main residences also with all non-resident exemptions scrapped.
And add in the £30 billion a year housing benefits bill that goes to BTL landlords.
Given that UK residential housing is by far the largest asset value in the UK (approx £7 trillion) and that hardly any of the gains are taxed, instead working taxpayers subsidise the housing market and pay high insecure rents (which in a rigged taxpayer subsidised housing market are just another tax) or take in massive unaffordable debt for rabbit hutches or worse...it truly is a scandal on a scale most people dont comprehend...
 
My view is, rates will go up, thanks to Carney's comments last week.
Two consequences in the housing market. UK demand from first time buyers will dry up. This will effect prices outside of marquee postcodes in London. Foreign direct investment in the capital will not be deterred. Rents will rise, given the surge in demand from first time buyers prices out of the market.
Landlords will see tapered capital appreciation, but compensation in rising rental yields.
 
Housing is grossly over priced by a factor of 3. Deflation is NEEDED which will reverse property price increases over the next decade.
 
There is no chance of that happening, we need to build a new house every 7 minutes to cater for the increase in the population. As that is not possible then demand will exceed supply and as such prices will continue to go up in the long term in my view.
 
Deflation is excess supply over demand!

Inflation is excess demand over supply!


Apply that to the housing supply and demand to get some idea of where prices may go.

Not forgetting the supply of house building is pretty inelastic.

Continued increases imo.
 
Maggie was the kicker that really turned the uk property market into another financial / investment vehicle..........we have a few segments within it (like any financial market) ......sure you have much more of a lead time buying/selling (in uk anyway)...........but other than that the standard rules apply of supply and demand........ and the market yields relative to the others.......

bonds / currencies / stocks / commodities / property.............we just happen to have people now living in (most) houses :)

N
 
Just have a look at what is being offered in Italy ! Might suit retired handy men. Mama mia

=====================================================================

Hopeful holiday home owners who are looking for some peace and quiet could bag a property for less than £1 in an idyllic Italian village.

Local authorities of three increasingly empty Italian towns are hoping to attract new residents by cutting the prices of some of their houses to just 1€.

Sadly there is a small catch, as most of the properties need around £18,000 worth of renovation work doing. And though their locations are breath taking lots of the houses on offer need rather a lot of work doing before they can be lived in.

But for someone with time on their hands, they should look to the three towns the Mail Online reported to have have embraced the offer. These are Gangi, in Sicily, Carrega Ligure in Piedmont and Lecce nei Marsi in Abruzzi.

The mayors of all three are concerned that if new life is not breathed back in, then they are in danger of becoming ghost-towns. Plagued by a lack of employment, natural disaster and even pirates, there are villages in Italy which lie completely empty.

In Gangi, houses needing less renovation can be bought for 100€ and a few very crumbling properties are being given away for free.

The houses are mostly all two storeys high and date back to the 1800s when they were built for peasant families.

For those who prefer more rugged surroundings, Carrega Ligure has houses nestled around five valleys that used to house monks. It’s unpolluted and absolutely freezing in the winter, due to its high altitude.

Lecce nei Marsi is in a Unesco world heritage site, its mayor Gianluca de Angelis told the Mail Online that 'I want to avoid that the historical centre crumbles to pieces, there are no public funds for maintenance and I'd like young couples to return.'

Houses in the village come complete with their own gardens, as Lecce nei Marsi is surrounded by forests in the middle of Italy.
 
Maggie was the kicker that really turned the uk property market into another financial / investment vehicle..........we have a few segments within it (like any financial market) ......sure you have much more of a lead time buying/selling (in uk anyway)...........but other than that the standard rules apply of supply and demand........ and the market yields relative to the others.......

bonds / currencies / stocks / commodities / property.............we just happen to have people now living in (most) houses :)

N

I would not blame Maggie completely, it was a good thing to get people on the property ladder and thousands have benefited from this.

what has screwed the whole scenario is the BUY To Let guys.
Put 15% deposit and the RENT will be TWICE the interest only mortgage payment.
and the LOW interest rates has to be blamed on this.

One of my friend has over 200 BTL properties.
so what is the way out???
 
maybe one of the ways to rectify this scenario is to shake out the BTL owners
The question is HOW?
> Many of the tenants are on housing benefit, so costing the Govt in Billions - maybe tighten the benefit laws, If the 3 million East Eurpeans immigrants can find work, then why cant the Brits find work????
> Maybe apply a premium to Interest rates to the BTL mortgages
> Rent Controls

C'mon Cameron, get cracking!
 
I would not blame Maggie completely, it was a good thing to get people on the property ladder and thousands have benefited from this.

what has screwed the whole scenario is the BUY To Let guys.
Put 15% deposit and the RENT will be TWICE the interest only mortgage payment.
and the LOW interest rates has to be blamed on this.

One of my friend has over 200 BTL properties.
so what is the way out???


Problem imo is the supply and cost of land.

Strangle supply of land, restricct building permits and permitted developments and you choke the market to pay stupid prices.

New green builds and off-grid developments have a chance to dramatically change lifestyles and resolve housing shortage but Councils and big G will not move.

Whole country is in the hands of the Lords and Barrons with vested interests to keep prices high.
 
Land Shortage?
When you go up on the plane and look out of the window, all we seen lot of empty space!
Just need the will to release the land
 
Top