Fundamental Analysis UK Housing Boom – Is the Party Over?

Recently the IMF said that the UK's property was overvalued and this could result in a spectacular slump. House prices in the US have slowed down considerably since 2005.

The UK avoided the Recession in 2001 when many countries went into deep recession. Post 9/11 the UK interest rates were at the lowest for many decades, this resulted in a boom in the UK housing market as the cost of mortgages was at its lowest. The low cost of borrowing also saw a boom in the buy to let market with many investors having a big portfolio of properties.

Not only was the UK government on a spending spree but also the UK consumer, due to the easy availability of credit. Currently the UK personal debt level has exceeded more than £1 trillion. It is expected that we could see a significant rise in insolvencies during 2008. The "time bomb" is ticking and could explode at any time; it could be triggered by any of the shocks to the economy. The Northern Rock fiasco was just the first such trigger, which resulted in savers withdrawing over £14 billion from the ailing Rock - no doubt the next 12 months we will witness more such triggers, which will dent overall consumer confidence. This could eventually lead to a big fall in the house prices.

Many "experts" feel that 2008 could see further rises in house prices, and some optimistic forecast has been put at over a 10% increase. Housing demand is influenced by the "feel good factor" resulting into the expectation that the house prices will continue to rise. Some of the reasons for a boom in house prices are;
  • Cheap mortgage rates post 9/11
  • Availability of easy credit
  • Speculation of ongoing price increases
  • Buy to let investors having large portfolio of properties
  • Amateur investors now joining the buy to let bandwagon

The worrying part is when amateur investors join the party; it's likely that we may have seen the peak! One can see similarities with the technology stock boom of 2000. Many investors bought at the peak and after several years they have yet to recoup their losses.

The past year has seen many amateur investors venture into the buy to let market for the first time. This has meant that they have had to buy at the peak, with the mortgage rates almost doubling in the past 5 years.

Currently prices are being supported by the expectations that they will continue to rise, and when this increase fails to materialise the bubble could burst. The house price inflation has been at its fastest this decade as can be seen from the following graph; and since 1995 we have not seen a dip in prices, it has just gone up in one straight line!

Image1-127.jpg


In addition, there are other serious issues with the economy which could trigger a sharp correction, not only in house prices but also the stock market. Some of the disturbing triggers will be;</span />
  • Lenders offering loans of up to 5 times multiples to salary, thus borrowers are overstretching themselves.</span />
  • Increases in mortgage rates have yet to have an impact and often this takes time to react. The mortgage rates have nearly doubled since 2002.</span />
  • Nearly 1 million Britons now own a second home, often as a buy to let investment. When the downturn in economy comes, panic is likely to set in amongst the buy to let investors, which would result in the market being flooded with house for sale.
  • The US sub-prime mortgage crisis also poses more risks for the UK's banking system. In the US the crisis has lead to plunging property prices, creating a loss of consumer confidence with billions of dollars in loss.
  • UK Job prospects are worsening, with many economist predicting unemployment to rise to 1.8 million+. The banking & financial sector has been a big driver for employment growth. Many firms in the housing market; this could result into deteriorating earnings and leading to staff cutbacks.
  • Consumer spending could see a slow down when faced with deteriorating economic and job conditions. Once again this would affect consumer spending, thus lower earnings.
  • Inflationary pressures are driven by high commodity prices, as demand from emerging economies like India and China continue to increase. This not only has an impact on the monetary policies like the interest rates but will have significant impact on earnings, which could lead to a big fall in stock market.

Buy-to-let bubble:
Is the party over? So far the landlords have had it easy, the cheap mortgage rates ensured that the rent covered the mortgage repayments and they benefited from the significant capital appreciation of their portfolio. It surely has been the best investment strategy for the past decade, as many investors have made fortunes and many have "retired" young.

Currently it is estimated that there are over a million buy to let mortgages, and landlords are now feeling the pinch. Past 2 years has seen significant rise in mortgage repayments and we are now seeing signs of price increase slowing down. The rents have not kept pace with outgoings, thus landlord profits have gone down. In some cases landlords are losing on their portfolio. Some areas in the UK have seen an oversupply of buy to let properties resulting into falling yields.

Although year on year prices rose by nearly 5% to December 2007, but the house prices fell for a second consecutive month in December according to Nationwide building society. New mortgages on a buy to let are also slowing, with many lenders now seeking up to 30% deposit and also a requirement that the rent on the property equates to 125% of monthly mortgage payment.

Unless the investor has a larger deposit the rental yield may be insufficient to cover the cost of the mortgage and with no expectations of a capital growth, you are likely to see significant drop in the buy-to-let mortgages. This could even result in many existing landlords starting to liquidate their portfolios. The only incentive to retain portfolios is the expectation of further capital gains. If this expectation evaporates and with falling yield, then there would be no point in buy to let investments.

Newer entrants to the buy to let market could soon face going into negative equity as soon as we start seeing declines in the prices. Furthermore, should the banks suffer to the extent of the housing bust, the fallout would be astronomical!

Changes to the Capital Gains could also contribute to the housing crash. The tax on property gains has been cut from 40% to 18% effective from 1st April 2008. So those investors who are sitting on fat profits would be tempted to lock in gains and also benefit from the lower tax.

Housing Repossessions
2007 has seen a significant rise in home repossessions, and it is expected that this figure will increase considerably in 2008. Rising property repossessions normally spell bad news for the property market creating a supply of houses, which are normally sold below market prices and this can dent confidence.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) has warned that the number of home repossessions is set to soar to levels not seen since the housing crash of the 1990s. It is also expected that there will be an increase in mortgage repayment arrears in the coming year.

Having said that, the current situation is very different from the 1990s. Firstly in the 90s interest rates were very high and peaked at 16%. We are probably unlikely to see huge scale cases of negative equity like we had in the 90s, due to the huge equity homeowners are sitting on at the moment.

What to do - Action Points?
  • If you are a homeowner and if you are contemplating selling your home, then the time to act is now,given that sharp falls may just be round the corner unless the government can delay the inevitable by aggressive reduction of interest rates.
  • Cash is king - with so much uncertainty, undoubtedly cash is king. Fixed interest and government bonds are increasingly becoming popular.
  • Stock market investment - Although we have seen healthy gains in the markets worldwide, longer term it offers good opportunity. Many analysts are calling for sharp falls in the markets and this should provide a good opportunity of bargain hunting. Emerging markets should also offer a good opportunity in the event of a market correction.

Conclusion
Just as in year 2000, when we saw the NASDAQ stock market boom, we are now seeing some similarities - irrational exuberance in the housing market.

During the NASDAQ boom, we saw many amateur investors jump into the market at the peak, we are now experiencing a similar situation. Many amateur investors are jumping into the buy to let market.

As with all market activity, prices do not go up in one straight line and you will always have price retracement, the question is how big the retracement will be? There is no doubt that a significant house price correction is on the cards, the only question remains is when? It is a case of any one of the triggers to set in - as soon as the first domino falls, panic will set in resulting into significant declines in house prices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please do as so far all I have seen is rent prices having gone up as more people are having to rent because they cannot buy and so the competition for rented is increasing. The last property I rented out I had over 50 people desperately wanting it. I don't doubt that some rents may decrease but it is not my experience that yields are dropping and in fact quite the reverse.


Paul

In London and Newcastle, so I imagine most areas, the rental market is saturated due to people not wanting to take a huge hit or being unable to flog their house. Not sure about Newcastle but London rentals are down between 5-20%. With the huge amount of rentals on the market and tenants knowing a lot of mortgages are off massively they are getting a great deal...
 
In London and Newcastle, so I imagine most areas, the rental market is saturated due to people not wanting to take a huge hit or being unable to flog their house. Not sure about Newcastle but London rentals are down between 5-20%. With the huge amount of rentals on the market and tenants knowing a lot of mortgages are off massively they are getting a great deal...

makes sense... competition and low interest rates could push down rentals.

I think london and newcastle are two opposite extremes to draw conclusions.
 
makes sense... competition and low interest rates could push down rentals.

I think london and newcastle are two opposite extremes to draw conclusions.

The two cities I live in... To Let boards are everywhere. I deal with one of the biggest, and dodgiest (guess who), estate agents in london and the negs and landlords are telling me rents are right down.

Agree with Anley's post. When the obsession dies, that'll be the bottom. Also, we're now around the long term average for prices so historically have a long way to fall as it always overshoots on the downside as it does on the up.
 
I'm an accountant and I've seen a lot of estate agents in liverpool whose businesses are turning right around in recent months. A few people are buying again but its mainly sellers. Rentals are static but there are a lot of vacant properties - as is the case in a lot of major cities so I'm told. I think once the general pubic gets wind of the fact that bricks and mortar aren't a get rich quick scheme things will sort themselves out. I've read something saying people want to be a homeowners or "developers" for social status has caused all of this mess. Effing idiots.
 
Fair points and I am not surprised about London, however, in my view it is not the same everywhere and often depends on the type of property and area in which it is located.


Paul
 
Well I don't have an economics degree so perhaps not qualified to take a view on the state of the nation....but not to worry :)

Time will play it self out and it will be interesting to watch and debate the next 5 years as it unfolds... I don't claim to know outcomes based on passed studies and increasingly have become sceptical of all that I thought I knew based on my actual trading experience... :eek:


May I object to one fundamental part of your input re: Thatcher years - where I do feel you are off-side in your consideration and interpretation of events perhaps...

When Thatcher came to power she really hacked the economy and industry to death. It's what I would call throwing the baby out with the bath water. Trade Unions were brought down to size but at what cost??? More than was called for imo. (Now we have the fat cats) Whilst the whole global world economy picked up UK had 3+m unemployed and a PSBR of £40+ bn. At the time that was shocking. It was well above the European 3% GDP defecit.

We also had North Sea Oil contributing billions to Inland Revenue. To pay for her hacking and blood letting she sold every single bleeding National Asset for pennies. Sid BT - railways. Tax payers assets going to private sector. We are now seeing the effects of the big bang and everything else she unleashed along with Rageanomics.

After 5 years of blood letting and localised depression UK tagged on to global growth.

We also had regional recession / depression. Call it what one wants to. Structural changes were supposed to take place with the death of British Leyland, Coal Mines, Ship Building and Textiles (declines started sometime in 19th century. The culling of manufacturing industry was excessive. We now have to import nuts and bolts if we ever want to build anything like rolling railway stock.

Despite all that house prices rose in late 70s and 80s and again in 90s.


Forget what we know and stand in the middle of 1978-9 years and tell me where housing stock and prices some of you doom sayers foresee? :whistling
 
Time will play it self out and it will be interesting to watch and debate the next 5 years as it unfolds... I don't claim to know outcomes based on passed studies and increasingly have become sceptical of all that I thought I knew based on my actual trading experience... :eek:


May I object to one fundamental part of your input re: Thatcher years - where I do feel you are off-side in your consideration and interpretation of events perhaps...

When Thatcher came to power she really hacked the economy and industry to death. It's what I would call throwing the baby out with the bath water. Trade Unions were brought down to size but at what cost??? More than was called for imo. (Now we have the fat cats) Whilst the whole global world economy picked up UK had 3+m unemployed and a PSBR of £40+ bn. At the time that was shocking. It was well above the European 3% GDP defecit.

We also had North Sea Oil contributing billions to Inland Revenue. To pay for her hacking and blood letting she sold every single bleeding National Asset for pennies. Sid BT - railways. Tax payers assets going to private sector. We are now seeing the effects of the big bang and everything else she unleashed along with Rageanomics.

After 5 years of blood letting and localised depression UK tagged on to global growth.

We also had regional recession / depression. Call it what one wants to. Structural changes were supposed to take place with the death of British Leyland, Coal Mines, Ship Building and Textiles (declines started sometime in 19th century. The culling of manufacturing industry was excessive. We now have to import nuts and bolts if we ever want to build anything like rolling railway stock.

Despite all that house prices rose in late 70s and 80s and again in 90s.


Forget what we know and stand in the middle of 1978-9 years and tell me where housing stock and prices some of you doom sayers foresee? :whistling

Thats exactly the point... house prices rose in 70,80s and 90s.
Now every c*nt and his dog think they own a house but all they have is a mortgage until the loan is paid. With negative equity looming in on all those people who locked themselves in to a 25 year agreement because it was only £100 a month more than rent and they could just about square it are trying to offload.
Not only that, since buying has exploded how much demand can be left with the likes of redrow and other house builders laying off staff and saying they're putting off new builds? 1st timers are off the rader with the new high deposits and they take most 1st time upscalers out with them. High end properties are losing value like its a new trend so the rich folks are even taking it easy.
Once the banks tighten lending regulation half the people who would have had mortgages thrown at them 3 years ago will be getting escorted off of the premises.
The problem that the government realised is that too much of britains wealth was tied up in bricks and mortar whereas countries like china have cash in the bank. as soon as property value fluxuates so does britains wealth.
This boom has to end some time mate. I think they're just trying to put it off for another 10 years.
 
Thats exactly the point... house prices rose in 70,80s and 90s.
Now every c*nt and his dog think they own a house but all they have is a mortgage until the loan is paid. With negative equity looming in on all those people who locked themselves in to a 25 year agreement because it was only £100 a month more than rent and they could just about square it are trying to offload.


Sorry I miss your point. :cheesy:

Standing on the corner of 1979 with Mrs Thathcer and her hand bag - were there no c*nts and their dogs back then who owned a house but all they had was a mortgage until the loan was paid.

How are we any different now to back then when things were pretty bad.

What exactly is your point?
 
Last edited:
Well I only made one reference to Thatcher which was to pay down debt in the eighties...as economy recovered...she made a point of making this happen.

Far be it for me to say everything was wonderful because it was not.

Her biggest mistake was to relax credit/lending...which is almost certainly the root cause of the problems we have today...but that doesn't let the current ( Viv Nicholson ) govt off the hook as they did nothing to stem this tide of easy money.
 
.....anyone know about Jupiter effect..?

...anyone know about Nostradamus....?

...What happens in Bermuda triangle...??

...anyone here a student of all 'end world is nigh' predictors...?

...Atilla...just worry about next 20 years or so.....doom merchants have a field day with statistics...I just follow my hunch....not the gurus or self proclaimed gurus of gloom and doom....!

...If I followed these gurus then I would have been sitting below an olive tree...!!
 
No, but sea levels are predicted to rise by a metre during the next hundred years. If the Greenland ice shelf melts (alone) that will be 7 metres over perhaps as little as 200 years. Whilst this isn't going to happen anytime in our lifetime I wonder what effect this would have on low lying coastal and riverside properties TODAY once the population realise that climate change is a serious problem. Would you buy a property that you had to sell onto someone who in turn couldn't sell it on?
 
Last edited:
No, but sea levels are predicted to rise by a metre during the next hundred years. If the Greenland ice shelf melts (alone) that will be 7 metres over perhaps as little as 200 years. Whilst this isn't going to happen anytime in our lifetime I wonder what effect this would have on low lying coastal and riverside properties TODAY once the population realise that climate change is a serious problem. Would you buy a property that you had to sell onto someone who in turn couldn't sell it on?

Venice is a great city...

Water World was an adventure...

Perhaps we'll go crawl right back into the water from where we've emerged from...


I'll stop worrying about the price of mi huse and tink about investing in a good shipyard... :idea:
 
The fact that house prices rose 70s through to 2007 is my point. Like everything it has to come to an end. House prices are inflated above their real value. If they don't drop back to allow first time buyers back into the market the whole system will crash. Also, who is going to buy a house when people are being laid off left right and centre?
And the numbers show that a lot more people now own houses so no not every c*nt owned a house back then. Most people started to own houses when they introduced right to buy back in the day.
The fact that they've cut capital gains to 18%, got rid of indexation allowances and taper relief which benefits those who've owned houses for longer and raised inheritance tax threshold shows where the gov are at on the situation. They want people to offload the things they've been hoarding and invest in commerce.
 
I have been told by various bargain house hunters in the UK lately that "we are near the bottom" ... I can barely contain my exitement at the thought of them being wrong and the warm feeling I get by not having any property in any part of the world at this time...

Far be it from me to make any kind of prediction..(but I will anyway). but I really dont think we have seen anything like the end of this recession / property correction / credit crunch etc. etc..

personally I am about to load up on GOLD.. for the next couple of weeks... I think if GM annouce Chapter 11 then the markets will tank at the though of MASSIVE layoffs accelerating the US jobless..

I did say that Obama would save the world, but not just yet....
 
......If things are going to be that bad as you say, then who is going to have any money to buy the gold...?

.....Starting with critical, mankind needs following to survive or exist.......air, water, food, shelter.............................................gold........
 
I have been told by various bargain house hunters in the UK lately that "we are near the bottom" ... I can barely contain my exitement at the thought of them being wrong and the warm feeling I get by not having any property in any part of the world at this time...

Far be it from me to make any kind of prediction..(but I will anyway). but I really dont think we have seen anything like the end of this recession / property correction / credit crunch etc. etc..

personally I am about to load up on GOLD.. for the next couple of weeks... I think if GM annouce Chapter 11 then the markets will tank at the though of MASSIVE layoffs accelerating the US jobless..

I did say that Obama would save the world, but not just yet....

Off topic Normbeef, but beware there is a H&S formation. If 900 is rejected anything below 870 will take gold down to 800 regions.

I reckon gold coming off the boils is an indication of some level of sanity returning to the markets. People have been trying to talk it up to $1000 again but until we have runaway inflation I would wait for confirmation before going long on gold.

Anyway, better to buy house than gold when inflation takes a grip. Stagflation even... :cheesy:
 
Top