For a trader that has impressed me with his technical ability and precision, this was a dumb move for you to make. Overnight? No entry signals? "Technical bounce more likely"? 890 is near enough to 1000? That is a 12% skew before you even get going. This is worse than sloppy and you know it.Grey1 said:Gap Trade ( May 18th - May 19th )
yesterday just before the market close I took two over night position . 1000 LONG APPL @ 63.24 LONG RMBS @ 28.11.
I took the trades based on the following technical reasons.
Pro
1) market was hammered for three days and a technical bounce was more likely
2) Both stocks were very Oversold on daily as well as intra day ( two time frames confirmation ) with LOW MACCI.
Cons
1) I had no buy signal from the VWAP engine
2 ) MRVL could have come up with poor result after hours and taken RMBS down in sympathy
Correct postion size for RMBS based on yesterday's volatility would have been 1000 shares and 890 for APPL Near enough for me to take 1000 of each .
My strategy for these two stocks will be as follow:--
if both stocks gap up i will close on the second bar ( 1 min ) , if stocks gap down i will close after a technical bounce up on the second bar. I will stick to my strategy and will post P/L of the trades after market opens ..
Danger Field said:For a trader that has impressed me with his technical ability and precision, this was a dumb move for you to make. Overnight? No entry signals? "Technical bounce more likely"? 890 is near enough to 1000? That is a 12% skew before you even get going. This is worse than sloppy and you know it.
Grey, you don't make up for quiet boring days with impulsive trades, we leave that to the newbies.
smbtnt said:Grey1,
Did your vwap engine come up with a buy signal on MRVL at close of play yesterday?
Grey1 said:Gap Trade ( May 18th - May 19th )
yesterday just before the market close I took two over night position . 1000 LONG APPL @ 63.24 LONG RMBS @ 28.11.
I took the trades based on the following technical reasons.
Pro
1) market was hammered for three days and a technical bounce was more likely
2) Both stocks were very Oversold on daily as well as intra day ( two time frames confirmation ) with LOW MACCI.
Cons
1) I had no buy signal from the VWAP engine
2 ) MRVL could have come up with poor result after hours and taken RMBS down in sympathy
Correct postion size for RMBS based on yesterday's volatility would have been 1000 shares and 890 for APPL Near enough for me to take 1000 of each .
My strategy for these two stocks will be as follow:--
if both stocks gap up i will close on the second bar ( 1 min ) , if stocks gap down i will close after a technical bounce up on the second bar. I will stick to my strategy and will post P/L of the trades after market opens ..
samtron said:Grey1
I applaud you for having the confidence (and experience) to post live trades, something very few "experts" are willing to do.
Thanks for sharing your reasons for taking the trades.
Grey1 said:Samtron My man ,
Posting the WIN and LOSE directly from Broker's screen is final evidence and proof of a trader's performance.
Grey1
JumpOff said:Grey1, the reason people like to see traders call their trades live, either here or in a chat room, is that is a handy way to put an time stamp on the post. Although the content could be edited after the fact, but those who subscribe to the thread would see it and cry 'foul!' Anyone with a graphics program can doctor up a printscreen of the broker's win/lose statement. (not suggesting that anyone here has done that, just acknowledging that it would be child's play for most computer users.) I think that is why some traders use a service like http://www.collective2.com/ which alows them to evaluate the ratios of traders as judged by an independant party.
Your dedication to position sizing strategy is duly noted. Feel free to link to a thread where you discuss this in detail, or please start one if you need to.
Your objection to trading 'hot stocks' is also noted. Feel free to start a thread discussing why and how to trade stocks that are not 'hot.'
JO
Now that's something I would jump on a plane for. Thanks for the invite guys. NAAARRTTTT!!!!Grey1 said:I will be having the pleasure of meeting up with Trader333 and Blue chip Trader soon to trade the market live using my account and a full day of chit chat on various aspects of day trading specially dynamic risk managment using postion sizing .
Jerry Olson said:LOL Hi Timsk
I love to trade, and have been doing it a long time. In fact i'll be 65 come this April 23rd....
JumpOff said:Grey1, the reason people like to see traders call their trades live, either here or in a chat room, is that is a handy way to put an time stamp on the post. Although the content could be edited after the fact, but those who subscribe to the thread would see it and cry 'foul!' Anyone with a graphics program can doctor up a printscreen of the broker's win/lose statement. (not suggesting that anyone here has done that, just acknowledging that it would be child's play for most computer users.) I think that is why some traders use a service like http://www.collective2.com/ which alows them to evaluate the ratios of traders as judged by an independant party.
Your dedication to position sizing strategy is duly noted. Feel free to link to a thread where you discuss this in detail, or please start one if you need to.
Your objection to trading 'hot stocks' is also noted. Feel free to start a thread discussing why and how to trade stocks that are not 'hot.'
JO
JohnHL said:Oh! Goodbye to another excuse I was using for my poor trading performance - my birth sign. I was 66 on April 23.
Jerry Olson said:i have no clue what you mean, just say what you want to say and stop pussyfooting around it John
Grey1 said:After the market opened I pair traded two semi conductor's BRCM againt MRVL as I was not getting any directional signal due to market consolidation . As I said before I am not good at gauging the market direction hence I hedged my postions. Things was going really well until Tradestation stopped all to gether and left me with a I/O error and a big hole in the data for the radar. SO i had to close the trades with $739.28 win minus costs.
I feel traders should learn how to hedge positions and trade professionally if the marke is indecisive like to day .
There are many ways of doing that and a search through Internet can reveal few techniques which is a must for all level of expertise.
I am posting the corrupted chart from TS and hence no more trading for me to day as VWAP engine will fire wrong signals due to the hole in the data. I have no doubt that i would lose if i trade with out my ENGINE.
Grey 1,JumpOff said:Your dedication to position sizing strategy is duly noted. Feel free to link to a thread where you discuss this in detail, or please start one if you need to.
JO