Trader333
Moderator
- Messages
- 8,753
- Likes
- 1,026
Grey1 said:bramble,,
when I saw the term clustering you mentioned that put smile on my face . Keep it up
Paul
Paul my man ,
ATR is near enough approximation for calculating volatility . I like it because people can relate to that. Very much like MPD bands . Theses bands are simple approximation to real VWAP bands . As my intention is not to complicate the stuff for our newbie’s hence I only discuss the simple way of doing things.
If you used ATR , for example you are ignoring volatility clustering (some period you have higher volatility than normal .. so if you only use 14 bars back and stock was going through consolidation you could have measureing the wrong volatility value as the condition under which you have measured volatility is subject to change ,, For example the stocks break out and volatility curve skews toward non conformity condition ) . This means your pos size is now carrying a higher risk than normal.. Our volatility model takes care of that . There are many ways of measuring volatility but our own model is an adaptation and refined version of maximum likelihood method..
Did this explanation help ?
Grey
Iraj,
Thanks for this and yes it has helped.
Paul