Purple Brain
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,613
- Likes
- 180
Such a good post. And leaves me almost in a quandary.Best trades and most profitable trades come when you take action immediately and the trade moves immediately or at least almost.
Its one thing to have a group of strategies and set-ups to trade, its another thing to sit and set-up and strategy watch.
But your only going to make money or of course lose it if you actually take action.
I see plenty of people on this forum and on other places posting analysis and telling everyone how its going to be etc etc. But very rarely do they take action and anticipate the move.
If you have what you believe to be a good strategy or a group of them, and you see your set-up taking shape....then trade the bloody thing...take action ...be brave and anticipate the move before it happens.
By the time other traders see the move, you will be busy moving your stop to entry and taking some profit off the table as they are just beginning to enter!
What the worst that can happen?
You take a small lose.
To many traders are obsessed with entry and confirmation.
My prior trading method to the one I am using at present did precisely that; see an embryonic setup taking shape and get in before confirmation. What was missing was me cutting my losses if it didn't develop and sitting there watching it take my full risk off the table.
I progressed from that to aggressively moving my stop to control risk and getting out for smaller losses. As I mentioned in an earlier post, this works better on losing trades than winning ones where I cut short my profits. Obviously I can tell the difference between a trade moving against me and one that's in profit so there isn't really any excuse for not knowing when to wind the ratchet and when to cut it some slack.
My quandary is that this latest iteration of trading method waits for confirmation based on momentum - which also seems like a good idea. I'm certainly getting into less trades, but the ones I am taking are more likely to run to profit, though of course, I'm getting less of the run.
I thought I was happy with that, but your comments suggest I could consider once again getting in on the promise - some sort of hybrid approach where I get in small size (scale in) on potential setups and then ramp up to full size on confirmation. Seems like a best of both worlds approach - which immediately has me on my guard.