I see you had a good discussion while I away on holiday for Weinstein's reasons for calling that the broad market was moving into Stage 4A. A friend of mine contacted Weinstein following the recent interview and got some clarification of why he was calling the move to early Stage 4A. He said that all of the popular averages were below their 200 day moving averages and that his proprietary S&P and Secondary Survey's which measure the percentage of stocks that are technically healthy in Stages 1 & 2 had fallen below 50% - which means that there were now more stocks in the bearish Stages 3 & 4 than in the bullish Stages of 1 & 2. So hence the Stage 4A (early in the declining phase) call for the broad market. Importantly, he went on the say you shouldn't worry if it's Stage 3B (late in the topping phase) or Stage 4A etc, as it's far more important to understand that
it is a time to be defensive.
Weinstein has said in recent commentary that the entire market is not yet negative, with a number of stocks that are still bullish, and he emphasised strongly that
not every stock is bearish at this point. However, this is apparently the way it has happened before historically in the early stages of a new bear market and that he has many reasons for the call, but the most important one, is that
all of the popular stock indices have moved below their 200 moving averages. The emphasis being placed on the
all part of that sentence. The indices that he is talking about here are:
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI)
S&P 500 (SPX)
Nasdaq Composite (COMP)
Nasdaq 100 (NDX)
Russell 2000 (RUT)
His proprietary S&P and Secondary Surveys are the next part of the call as they peaked in mid September and deteriorated rapidly to below their 50% levels in early November causing the market to become increasingly short term oversold. He placed a strong emphasis on the fact that the short term should only be considered as a "2" on the Richter Scale, whereas the longer term action should be thought of as a "10" on the Richter Scale and hence the various signs don't bode well for the coming months. So this once again highlights what I've said before on the thread that Weinstein's method is mostly a longer term method and that he considers short term moves much less important.
So this has given us a slightly different clarification of how to determine when the market is moving from a neutral Stage 3 to a bearish Stage 4 phase and that is: "if, at any point, all of the popular stock averages break down below their respective 200 day moving averages - and this happens in concert with both the S&P and Secondary Surveys breaking below their respective 50% levels - then a troublesome market will become much more of a problem, and the long term pattern will move from a neutral but weakening position to a bearish rating."
Now the problem retail traders like us have with that statement is that we are unable to access the data for his proprietary S&P and Secondary Surveys which measure the percentage of stocks that are technically healthy in Stages 1 & 2 without a $10,000 subscription to the GTA newsletter. And I'm fairly certain no one on this site is likely to be able to do, that as you'd need a $1million account size minimum to make that worthwhile - i.e. 1% fee per year, and even that would be too much imo as you need to minimise your annual trading costs well below that, and you need to include data costs and all other trading costs in that as well, as all of those costs are your business overheads and give you your break-even point each year before you make any profit from your trading. Trading is a business after all, and so you should treat it as such.
Anyway, back to the point I was making in that the S&P and Secondary Surveys are not available to us…you can however, use the next best thing which is the "Percentage of stocks above their 30 week (150 day) moving averages (
$NYA150R)" which is available for free on Stockcharts site or in my
Market Breadth thread which I update regularly. This and the Percentage of stocks above their 10 week (50 day) moving averages ($NYA50R) are referenced in the GTA reports as key indicators to follow and do basically the same thing as his S&P and Secondary Surveys in that the vast majority of stocks above their 30 week MAs will be in Stages 1 or 2, and so you can use it as a reasonable substitution for the proprietary surveys.
I see from the discussion while I was away that you both thought that the one year trendline break was the cause of the Stage 4A call. However, from listening to the interview and talking to my friend that was given a few recent weekly GTA updates following his email to Weinstein, it's clear that the "Weight of Evidence" approach that Weinstein references regularly which involves numerous breadth indicators, such as the Advance Decline Line, Advance Decline Momentum Indictor, Glamour Average, Speculation Index (weekly OTC volume/weekly NYSE volume), Buy/Sell ratio, 10 day High-Low Differential gauges, New High New Lows, Call/Put Ratio, NYSE 10 day Advance-Decline moving average, Investors Intelligence survey of the percentage of bullish market advisors, Large Block Ratio, Investors Intelligence Overbought/Oversold Oscillator (the percentage of stocks on the New York Exchange that are above their respective 10 week moving averages), Eleven O’Clock Indicator, New Offerings gauge (a 10 week moving total), Net Free Reserves gauge, Insiders Sell/Buy Ratio, Mutual Fund Cash Ratio, Bank Cash Ratio, Alert Indicator (AAA Bond Yields/3 Month T-Bill rates), as well as his proprietary S&P and Secondary Surveys are all part of the reason for his call and that although major trend lines are important there's much more depth to this method, as you need to consider the various internals along with the price action to determine the correct Stages, as Weinstein says that several decades ago, they devised their “Weight of the Evidence” approach, and that they always listen to what
the majority of their time-tested indicators are saying. So I'd expand on that, that this time although the S&P 500 market stage appeared to be only moving into Stage 3 when Weinstein called 4A for the broad market, the additional weight of evidence from the breadth gauges and the fact that all of the popular stock indices have moved below their 200 moving averages is indicating that it is a much more serious longer term problem and hence it is a time to be defensive, even though we can still have very strong short term rallies like we've had the last few weeks. Remember the Richter Scale reference - the short term is considered a "2" and the longer term is considered a "10" with Weinsteins method.