SonicSunburst
Member
- Messages
- 76
- Likes
- 9
I have an appointment to go to. I can't listen live. Senen is trying to tell everyone that the 62% loss is a figment of the collective imagination. 'Don't worry about it.'
But isn't Senna just referring clients to the managed service? Why is he making any comment on the results, good bad or otherwise? The broker should be the only one communicating with clients if the initial introduction was only a referral.
That aside, does the one day result of a 62% loss marry with the risk profile in the MDA agreement? i.e. Is the trading strategy and risk management that you agreed to aggressive enough to allow for a loss like that? If it is then you just wear it.
Another point you guys may not be aware of, is that most FX brokers are market makers and don't hedge the majority of their risk. If you lose, they win. They also regularly share those profits they make from clients with those that introduce the business to them.
So while you lost 62% last night, it's highly possible that IIC pocketed a % of your loss. They took a cut of the spread, and they also took a cut of your loss. I know market makers who will rebate up to 50% of the client's losses to the introducer.
For your own peace of mind, you should straight our ask both the broker, and Senna what fees and commission both parties are making from you. You may find that both parties have a vested interest in you losing all your money. If they were located in Australia they would have to disclose all this in the FSG, but because the broker if offshore you may not get an honest, straight answer anyway.