Forexmospherian
Legendary member
- Messages
- 39,928
- Likes
- 3,306
Criticism is a contribution and a good one , without criticism we wont improve , life wont improve , without criticism liars can say whatever they want without being held accountable , con artists can freely con gullible fools , without criticism smartphones companies wont bring something better to the table , without criticism a newb can be talked into giving his savings , without criticism we wont be a better traders and we wont seek better trading strategies ... etc ... etc .
When i want to buy anything a smartphone , a book , open an account with a broker i first look up critics reviews , i want to see what is the worst case , then i make my own judgement after doing my homework .
We need criticism much like any other contribution , otherwise we will be reading positive reviews all day long and we will end up setting between a bunch of marketeers and charlatans .
Tar
i know this is unusual - maybe only third or fourth time........ - but I 100% agree with your comments above - everything should be challenged and tested by many and then the reviews should include both good and bad comments.
I know of a few really unhappy farmers who had banked with Barclays Bank for years. They became unhappy and felt badly let down and it ended up with then taking out adverts in local papers complaining of the bank - and they even ended with them literally muck spreading outside 2 of their banks.
That as not put me off banking with Barclays - but i am sure it might have lost them a lot of local customers - who might move out of principle etc etc
Nothing wrong with criticism
Regards
F