http://rt0.e.prorealtime.com/ProRea...06867905d0b4cb24fa760b37ca9720761e713&print=1
hopefully the link above opens
As this is a review, again it all depends on what charting package etc you use, I was allready long on the 9.40 candle, so ws text would confirm my postion, as you can clearly see the 9.50 candle hit his entry level, anyway you would also take this trade on the bullish pattern. the exit on the 10.10 candle was a count system as well as multiple resitance levels 1 hr chart 200ma.
not trying to prove a point or defend him but again his results could all vary on who you trade with and what charts you use.
No. I was extremely quick to react to the texts, it just never hit the level of entry.
You're welcome to check that on your charts if you wish. I'm doing this the best I can.
I see there are some comments regarding "depends on what you use for entry". WS seems to use IG. So I have IG for index trades. For forex, I use an ECN with typical spread of about 0.9, and quite often 0.5, so if you're claiming you got filled and I didn't, and that make sthe difference, well I think your broker is very good.
shakeone,
please do not think i am critising, i think you are doing an excellent job, what i am trying to say its not just about the calls, you need dma charting as well, imho
I use the dma charts and trade them.
im using SB accts you need to take the spreads etc into consideration etc, after using ws texts emails and adjusting them with you brokers price, it easily can work, too many variables for him to factor in.
I think everbody reading this thread needs to understand this, surely nobody expects to blindly react to an entry / exit price without doing their own homework, if it was easy as that we would all be very rich !!!
Sorry, but I'm not clear on what you are talking about. I was watching live at the time, and it didn't reach the level on those I said didn't. The entry was 1.3330 (not 1.3333), which your chart agrees was NOT hit. Yet you post a chart saying "the entry was their (sic)". As for other patterns and candles that you mention, that's all well and good, but I'm trying to give a fair review of the signals from WS, and not individuals opinions of what is what.
No. I was extremely quick to react to the texts, it just never hit the level of entry.
You're welcome to check that on your charts if you wish. I'm doing this the best I can.
I see there are some comments regarding "depends on what you use for entry". WS seems to use IG. So I have IG for index trades. For forex, I use an ECN with typical spread of about 0.9, and quite often 0.5, so if you're claiming you got filled and I didn't, and that make sthe difference, well I think your broker is very good.
I don't know what dma charting is, I know what dma is. WS claims to use IG index for indices, I have that. For forex as mentioned I have an ECN. 1.3330 on EURUSD from 9:41 am Uk time, then you either got filled after 1pm, or you didn't get filled. If you are getting fills at 9:41, please let me know your broker. Your own chart suggests you didnt' get filled there. I think the call was good, in that there was a good up move afterwards. But that's not the same as getting filled, which I didn't.
As for other patterns and candles that you mention, that's all well and good, but I'm trying to give a fair review of the signals from WS, and not individuals opinions of what is what.
1.333 = 1.3330. Case closed. There was no fill.
I'm trying to do a job correctly. The job is not to infer what people following his analysis and calls might do. That's an impossible job. I'm just following the calls as best I can.
If you want my personal opinion which is sideline to the review, and not factual so people should probably ignore. I think he's made some good calls so far, some entries are very nice in that there has been very little drawdown during trade, but several claimed entires could never be filled. Also for a follower the results are hugely different from what is claimed, plus at the moment it's too early to say much, since his overall gains of 60 points are less than the initial risk on just one trade (he opened several trades with risk over 60).
P.S. have just received a text stating WS gains are at +267. My gains are at +60.
P.P.S. Well done Liverpool
sorry just checked my text says 1.333
to me my brian would read 1.333333333333333333333333,
the point being I went long on the chart, regardless of what cs, ig, cms or whoever was quoting at the time
What an amateur
shakeone,
please do not think i am critising, i think you are doing an excellent job, what i am trying to say its not just about the calls, you need dma charting as well, imho
I use the dma charts and trade them.
im using SB accts you need to take the spreads etc into consideration etc, after using ws texts emails and adjusting them with you brokers price, it easily can work, too many variables for him to factor in.
I think everbody reading this thread needs to understand this, surely nobody expects to blindly react to an entry / exit price without doing their own homework, if it was easy as that we would all be very rich !!!
The point is he is claiming the pips when they couldn't have been got and yes of course you would do your homework and should never follow anyone blindly but that is a different argument. He has tried to follow the trades and is +60 and not 200.still 60 a week is ample. Lets see. Great work shakone.
I think the moment of truth will come when a few losers are 140 points worse than he reports.
1.333 = 1.3330. Case closed. There was no fill.
I'm trying to do a job correctly. The job is not to infer what people following his analysis and calls might do. That's an impossible job. I'm just following the calls as best I can.
If you want my personal opinion which is sideline to the review, and not factual so people should probably ignore. I think he's made some good calls so far, some entries are very nice in that there has been very little drawdown during trade, but several claimed entires could never be filled. Also for a follower the results are hugely different from what is claimed, plus at the moment it's too early to say much, since his overall gains of 60 points are less than the initial risk on just one trade (he opened several trades with risk over 60).
P.S. have just received a text stating WS gains are at +267. My gains are at +60.
P.P.S. Well done Liverpool
1.333 = 1.3330. Case closed. There was no fill.
I'm trying to do a job correctly. The job is not to infer what people following his analysis and calls might do. That's an impossible job. I'm just following the calls as best I can.
If you want my personal opinion which is sideline to the review, and not factual so people should probably ignore. I think he's made some good calls so far, some entries are very nice in that there has been very little drawdown during trade, but several claimed entires could never be filled. Also for a follower the results are hugely different from what is claimed, plus at the moment it's too early to say much, since his overall gains of 60 points are less than the initial risk on just one trade (he opened several trades with risk over 60).
P.S. have just received a text stating WS gains are at +267. My gains are at +60.
P.P.S. Well done Liverpool