I was taught this when I was 12; never take a graph or statistical representation of information as being a main source of evidence. Stats can and have been manipulated throughout the years to serve individual purposes. Think that can be a main source of evidence? What is that, a 4 month gain? A gain in the region of months? Cunning tale, chap.
This is what they teach 12 year olds? You are one advanced youngster.
Dunecat, just chill out and think about what's going on here.
You're bombarding us with your multifarious theories about the world's financial system. Some of your arguments have merit, but some are specious. However, any discussion on economics will contain a small element of supposition or even fallacy, with occasional quotes of experts thrown in to back up the argument.
(Remember Gordon Brown? He claimed he was following some sort of Keynesian model by spending during a recession. Well, only partly. Keynes also advocated building a surplus during good times, something Brown never did. The point is, it's easy to selectively quote anyone to back up your argument).
BUT THIS IS ALL IRRELEVANT as this is NOT a forum for endlessly debating financial theory, it's a website where people discuss how better to trade and to make money.
The reason you're winding NR up is that all your verbiose utterances are COMPLETELY unconnected with making money.
You want to buy gold? Ok, if you had £10k total equity, how much gold would you buy? Would you buy it here? Would you wait for a pullback? Where is your stop?
In addition you want to buy BP. Are these your two trades, long gold and BP? Will you invest all your money in this?
What is your STRATEGY for making money, other than buying and simply hoping they go up? What if they go down? Where do you get out?
Your presence on this website is slightly bizarre in that you seem to want to expound your economic theories, but don't seem that interested in formulating a trading plan. Perhaps this is where you should focus more of your energy -- this is what NR is alluding to!