you are from england so you do not understand a lot of political and historical matters from the relationship between mexico and usa, any way, we have a lot, people i know, of people form the usa living illegally in mexico, and from the uk too, but these is not a political discussion site, lets focus on our matter.
Fayalac - employee or otherwise, as you are one of the greatest traders on the planet, it is rather dissapointing to us that you are still having to scrape a living in the 51st state checking people's paperwork.
Imagine my shock though, when I pulled up at McCormick & Schmicks in El Segundo the other day and who was doing the valet parking that night? Yup - Warren Buffet.
Not really.... it was a Mexican, of course. What else in LA?
fayalac - employee or otherwise, as you are one of the greatest traders on the planet, it is rather dissapointing to us that you are still having to scrape a living in the 51st state checking people's paperwork.
Imagine my shock though, when i pulled up at mccormick & schmicks in el segundo the other day and who was doing the valet parking that night? Yup - warren buffet.
Not really.... It was a mexican, of course. What else in la?
well you started it. You got very uppity unnecessarily over someone using a very common colloquial name for the usa. Since you wanted to be absolutely correct in terms of terminology, i thought i'd be correct in terms the real world facts.
Mexico has a lot of illegal aliens rather than the usa? Are you sure?
Who's heading south of the rio grande for a shot at a better life? Drug dealers?
If the US keeps going as it is, that will be true one day, sooner than people think. But at the moment, America is definitely still a country rather than a continent.
it's a bit like the way people think of europe. They are a band.
You haven't ever asked HC.
He's a flake, although it is interesting to see you haven't quite come to that conclusion yet.
what a convenient memory you have, my dear. I've accused you repeatedly of flying a false flag.
Whether i believe him to be a flake or not is not possibly known by you. Just because i treat someone with respect, or defend him when i believe he is being unfairly attacked, or i give him some blowback tools, is not correlated with my belief in his veracity.
There should be absolutely no doubt in your mind who i consider a flake on this forum.
Well...., why dont you explain to me?
If you're risking 0.3%, thats means on that trade you're max loss is 0.3% of your account balance. This guy went to Howard's school of Risk:Reward. If i risk 0.3% which is actually 18%, but if its a winner, i actually risked 100%.
What a convenient memory you have, my dear. I've accused you repeatedly of flying a false flag.
Whether I believe him to be a flake or not is not possibly known by you. Just because I treat someone with respect, or defend him when I believe he is being unfairly attacked, or I give him some blowback tools, is not correlated with my belief in his veracity.
There should be absolutely no doubt in your mind who I consider a flake on this forum.
howard - like i said - you've never asked me where i am from. You still haven't.
What flags the t2w software puts against my name is beyond my control.
You still know so little about trading that you are actually considering the guy in question might be genuine.
This makes you a fool, howard. Plain and simple.
If you're risking 0.3%, thats means on that trade you're max loss is 0.3% of your account balance. This guy went to Howard's school of Risk:Reward. If i risk 0.3% which is actually 18%, but if its a winner, i actually risked 100%.
No, in fact it works on a different way.
I risk max 0.3% of my equity at each trade ( 3 usd out from each 1000 usd ).
I use no stop or limit, and not because of the nfa rules, because my account is in england i can use both of them, but i dont do it because i dont care if i have some pips against me while my trend is still lined into my direction.
If the trend change then i can 1) close that position with whatever a profit of loss it can have, 2) start my plan b or c - in such case -.
Basically i am trend chaser, i have had positions loosing 300 or more pips but since my trend hasnt changed i stick to it and eventually profit from that position.
Anyway at a previous post i said i closed a couple of positions loosing about 600 pips three weeks ago, with my rule (0.3%) i lost only 18% of my account but that same week i had a lot of winning positions so i closed the week winning 620 pips, if my invstment were higher than what i do i could be margin called.
Anyway, its not often that i have such situations, for example last week at some time i had won about 600 pips but i had some loosing positions with a total of -780 pips my net effect was -180 pips ( 5.4% of my equity - a small drawdown -), that was wednesday, i reviewed all graphs and decided there was no need to implment plan b so i sticked, thursday evening i had won 1,060 pips without open positions, it was friday when i decided to enter into a couple of positions, the first one was closed with 12 pips (very small but the trendline was starting to show signs that it would change) and the other one is actually loosing 98 pips but my trend is basically the same so i stick to it.
so, if my method is so bad, why are you worried?, if you have risked a 100% (i dont think so) then your method is so good that you should be sipping piñas coladas at some caribbean beach instead trying to find if i am doing what i say i do, dont you think so? :whistling
fool?, you ****ing idiot?, why dont you explain us what you do to p´rofit, in case you do?