wiseambitions
Established member
- Messages
- 764
- Likes
- 7
Performance at various settings:
In the last 100 trades. Arising since middle August 2010
FMT 35/40/BE@20 + 685
Old FMT 40/40 +640
10/40 (conservative) +800
43/65/BE@20 +831
In the last 200 trades (which include those above), arising since early January 2010
New FMT +1620
Old FMT +1840
10/40 +1300
43/65/BE +1878
Observations
1) The latest 100 trades are definitely less profitable than the first 100 (no surprise there!)
2) Original FMT 40/40 settings still doing well
3) A conservative setting eg 10tp/40sl, having a dangerous r/r ratio has done really well recently but not so startling in context of the last 60 weeks as it was vulnerable to big single losses
4) the 'Deserteagle' 43/65 strategy, although prone to bigger single losses, has done consistently well
Please note E&OE. Satisfy yourself before acting upon any such information.
In the last 100 trades. Arising since middle August 2010
FMT 35/40/BE@20 + 685
Old FMT 40/40 +640
10/40 (conservative) +800
43/65/BE@20 +831
In the last 200 trades (which include those above), arising since early January 2010
New FMT +1620
Old FMT +1840
10/40 +1300
43/65/BE +1878
Observations
1) The latest 100 trades are definitely less profitable than the first 100 (no surprise there!)
2) Original FMT 40/40 settings still doing well
3) A conservative setting eg 10tp/40sl, having a dangerous r/r ratio has done really well recently but not so startling in context of the last 60 weeks as it was vulnerable to big single losses
4) the 'Deserteagle' 43/65 strategy, although prone to bigger single losses, has done consistently well
Please note E&OE. Satisfy yourself before acting upon any such information.