...........
Sea level rises don't concern me personally as I'm not convinced they're a major problem that can't be managed. I refer back to my earlier post about this;
..........................................
I can't tell how much it pains me to say this, but: You're right. Now can we just forget about this unfortunate lapse and move on?
The rise in sea-levels can indeed be managed in the sense that, assuming the process cannot be slowed down or reversed by us (whether we are the cause or not) then we are left with finding solutions to the difficulties caused by said rise. In the case of the Thames barrier et al* the problem is not your ordinary common or garden rise - when not a lot is happening either geologically or astronomically - but rather when there's a surge. I'm sure that you're aware that your surge can take different forms and has different causes - tidal, fluvial, storm, lunar and....wait for it....supermoon. We'll leave out blue surge for the moment as it's mostly out of fashion. Anyway, yer Thames Barrier cove does very well during yer run o' the mill surge but when there's any kind of causal combination things get a bit dicy, Ginger. See image, 'ere:
https://assets.publishing.service.g...01903_TB_Closures_by_Flood_Season_960x640.jpg
In that, you'll observe that all was possibly fine and even dandy until 2014 when the barrier was up and down like Kim's drawers. The cause was just such a combination and not the 1/1000 event that that the barrier isn't designed to cater for.
What will almost certainly lead to the barrier failing is either that there are so many closure-worthy events that this will cause a mechanical failure, or, far more likely, that there occurs at the same time: 1) A slightly higher "normal" sea-level - and we're talking only a few centimetres 2) A period of heavy rain in the South/South East 3) A big fat storm in the North Sea 4) A "supermoon" .
Isn't this not the epitome of the Dirty Harry moment?:
" You've got to ask yourself one question. Do I feel lucky?" . Personally, I rather wait until after 2032 to answer that one
At this point it's worth remembering that the south of England is sinking at the rate of approximately 15cms per century....Things that make you say Hmmmm. , IMO, not "if" but "when" ....and now, Back to the Music: as we appear to be saying that we don't like what's in Boxes 1 and 2 (We can stop the rise and we should try to stop the rise) then really all that's left is Box 3 mitigation, no matter how expensive and disruptive that will be.
I won't bore you with pages of links to givernment (or even government) agencies throughout Europe as I'm sure you're more than capable of doing your own research and making up your own mind in a rational MSM and politico averse manner. These two below kind of give you a hint of what the rest will be like anyway. I've already decided on my own mitigation approach - I'm going to mitigate myself and my family at least 50 miles inland and 150+ metres above sea-level and if things begin to look really dicy (Ginger), I shall build an ark and christen her "The Mitigator".
www.ntslf.org
News and updates from the Environment Agency
environmentagency.blog.gov.uk
* Here's a club you can join!....no boozy lunches in Soho though
climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu