Capitalism

That old chestnut. Worth repeating to put capitalism and what it gives one in perspective...

There was no mention of more sex or bungee jumps. A palliative nurse who has counselled the dying in their last days has revealed the most common regrets we have at the end of our lives. And among the top, from men in particular, is 'I wish I hadn't worked so hard'.

Bronnie Ware is an Australian nurse who spent several years working in palliative care, caring for patients in the last 12 weeks of their lives. She recorded their dying epiphanies in a blog called Inspiration and Chai, which gathered so much attention that she put her observations into a book called The Top Five Regrets of the Dying.

Ware writes of the phenomenal clarity of vision that people gain at the end of their lives, and how we might learn from their wisdom. "When questioned about any regrets they had or anything they would do differently," she says, "common themes surfaced again and again."

Here are the top five regrets of the dying, as witnessed by Ware:

1. I wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.

"This was the most common regret of all. When people realise that their life is almost over and look back clearly on it, it is easy to see how many dreams have gone unfulfilled. Most people had not honoured even a half of their dreams and had to die knowing that it was due to choices they had made, or not made. Health brings a freedom very few realise, until they no longer have it."

2. I wish I hadn't worked so hard.

"This came from every male patient that I nursed. They missed their children's youth and their partner's companionship. Women also spoke of this regret, but as most were from an older generation, many of the female patients had not been breadwinners. All of the men I nursed deeply regretted spending so much of their lives on the treadmill of a work existence."

Advertisement

3. I wish I'd had the courage to express my feelings.

"Many people suppressed their feelings in order to keep peace with others. As a result, they settled for a mediocre existence and never became who they were truly capable of becoming. Many developed illnesses relating to the bitterness and resentment they carried as a result."

4. I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.

"Often they would not truly realise the full benefits of old friends until their dying weeks and it was not always possible to track them down. Many had become so caught up in their own lives that they had let golden friendships slip by over the years. There were many deep regrets about not giving friendships the time and effort that they deserved. Everyone misses their friends when they are dying."

5. I wish that I had let myself be happier.

"This is a surprisingly common one. Many did not realise until the end that happiness is a choice. They had stayed stuck in old patterns and habits. The so-called 'comfort' of familiarity overflowed into their emotions, as well as their physical lives. Fear of change had them pretending to others, and to their selves, that they were content, when deep within, they longed to laugh properly and have silliness in their life again."

What's your greatest regret so far, and what will you set out to achieve or change before you die?
 
Of course no system suits all but Capitalism really fails badly in the multi trillion dollar healthcare industry.
The big pharmaceutical companies really don't want to cure people, they want them to be sick and buying more pills and drugs. They are basically money making rackets with no altruism at all.
Anti biotic drugs are losing their potency and will soon be gone. Are the billion dollar pharma companies interested in doing the R&D to find alternatives ? Apparently not. So shame on them if it becomes too dangerous for hospitals to do even minor operations. Without anti biotics a scratch or small cut could become fatal.
 
Of course no system suits all but Capitalism really fails badly in the multi trillion dollar healthcare industry.
The big pharmaceutical companies really don't want to cure people, they want them to be sick and buying more pills and drugs. They are basically money making rackets with no altruism at all.
Anti biotic drugs are losing their potency and will soon be gone. Are the billion dollar pharma companies interested in doing the R&D to find alternatives ? Apparently not. So shame on them if it becomes too dangerous for hospitals to do even minor operations. Without anti biotics a scratch or small cut could become fatal.

Calling a cat a dog won't make it bark. Calling a person a Capitalist doesn't make them greedy and calling that same person a Socialist or Communist won't make them become altruistic...FFS! :rolleyes:

I don't see any great medical advances or cures coming out of The Democratic People's Republic of Korea which classes itself as a genuine workers' state in which all the people are completely liberated from exploitation and oppression.

http://www.korea-dpr.com/
 
There is research going on to fight it. I recently read an article that there are only fraction of microbes in soil where antibiotics comes from, that are being used. It has until recently been difficult to research more because they can't replicate the conditions for them to survive in labs on a scale that can produce enough. Anyway a recent breakthrough has enabled them to achieve it so hopefully they will find new types.

This month I read an article where Australian scientists have found proteins that doesn't harm humans but causes massive damage to resistant bugs but dissolving their cell walls. Certainly possible to pave a way to extend our time to alow more research.

I think it's just a matter of time before scientists engineer permanent solutions without needing microbes. The advances in immune therapy is definitely paving the way for this.
 
But at least they leave everyone's lives equally impoverished, so I guess that's fair.

Does it, though? I've, yet, to see a poor socialist leader/politician/ union leader. In Spain, we have the likes of Gonzalez, Guerra, Zapatero. They don't look impoverished to me.

In the truly Communist countries they lived in luxury. I wonder what that character, with the haircut, at the top of N.Korea lives like? Looks very flabby, to me.
 
I am reading "The Company" by Robert Littel. I warn---it's 1250 pages long ( I am reading it in Spanish and it has taken me from end July) It is an enjoyable read, though, and I recommend it.

I know that it is a novel but it gives a good insight into life in Cold War Russia. It has a ring of truth, to me! I'd rather stay the way I am ie. a lackey to the capitalist way of life.
 
Capitalism sucks
 

Attachments

  • Kapitalismus-510x432.jpg
    Kapitalismus-510x432.jpg
    99.9 KB · Views: 149
Does it, though? I've, yet, to see a poor socialist leader/politician/ union leader. In Spain, we have the likes of Gonzalez, Guerra, Zapatero. They don't look impoverished to me.

In the truly Communist countries they lived in luxury. I wonder what that character, with the haircut, at the top of N.Korea lives like? Looks very flabby, to me.

the PSOE guys are just as corrupt as the PP guys. Same kind of criminals in different disguises. it has it's reasons why Podemos does not what to coalize with ANY of them...
 
the PSOE guys are just as corrupt as the PP guys. Same kind of criminals in different disguises. it has it's reasons why Podemos does not what to coalize with ANY of them...

Podemos is very left wing. There can be nothing in common with PP, or Ciudidanos. PSOE is just centre enough to be able to pact. A pact with Podemos would set my alarm bells ringing! As it is, pact, or no pact, I don't think it will be long before thieves fall out. We'll see!
 
Podemos is very left wing. There can be nothing in common with PP, or Ciudidanos. PSOE is just centre enough to be able to pact. A pact with Podemos would set my alarm bells ringing! As it is, pact, or no pact, I don't think it will be long before thieves fall out. We'll see!

that's the point. PSOE is just waving a leftwing banner und using leftwing rhetorics. In fact, lot's of PSOE founders were funcionaries in the Franco regime.
But you are right. Let's see what the next round of reelections will bring
 
The thing is that the "truly Communist countries" never were communist... first things disabled always were the councils (and thus the cores of any "truly communist" rulership). What was left behind were rhetoric shells covering oppressive und subdueing systems with state-directed economies... perversions of the original idea,
Maybe comparable with the original athenic democracies and the "democracies" that dominate the world today
 
that's the point. PSOE is just waving a leftwing banner und using leftwing rhetorics. In fact, lot's of PSOE founders were funcionaries in the Franco regime.
But you are right. Let's see what the next round of reelections will bring

:D

For the Colonel's Lady an' Judy O'Grady
Are sisters under their skins !
 
As I see it, If PSOE pacts with the right wing government and Cs, then Podemos wil become the opposition party in Spain.
 
The food industry and pharmaceuticals should definitely not be capitalist. Do you really think they want you to be fit and healthy ? Of course NOT. They want to sell you buckets full of pills and stuff like white sugar and white bread. Both toxic.
They are geared up to make money and are NOT particular as to how they do it.
 
Last edited:
The food industry and pharmaceuticals should definitely not be capitalist. Do you really think they want you to be fit and healthy ? Of course NOT. They want to sell you buckets full of pills and stuff like white sugar and white bread. Both toxic.
They are geared up to make money and are NOT particular as to how they do it.


But in the UK, wouldn't you say government control of food production introduced with WWII rationing (from 1940, disgracefully enduring until 1954!), plus the NHS, are responsible for the atrocious under-development of both fields?
 
The food industry and pharmaceuticals should definitely not be capitalist. Do you really think they want you to be fit and healthy ? Of course NOT. They want to sell you buckets full of pills and stuff like white sugar and white bread. Both toxic.
They are geared up to make money and are NOT particular as to how they do it.

Add HFC, oils (other than olive), hydrogenated oils and processed food products too that list!

and salt!!
 
But in the UK, wouldn't you say government control of food production introduced with WWII rationing (from 1940, disgracefully enduring until 1954!), plus the NHS, are responsible for the atrocious under-development of both fields?

Not really. An important case in point is the abuse of anti biotics. Their effectiveness is decreasing and will soon be at such a low point as to be ineffective. The big pharmas won't spend the money to find new drugs to take over. When this happens even routine operations will be too dangerous to do.
 
Not really. An important case in point is the abuse of anti biotics. Their effectiveness is decreasing and will soon be at such a low point as to be ineffective. The big pharmas won't spend the money to find new drugs to take over. When this happens even routine operations will be too dangerous to do.


There's no profit for pharma in deceased patients and sick people too scared to go to a doctor. I can see why pharma would be risk-conscious when allocating R&D funds - in some stages of the cycle they might even need government incentives like tax breaks and grants as insurance - but nationalisation is a route back into a darker history.
 
Top