I sense many will argue against your opinion as they are heavily invested in TA.98% traders either lose all or don't make money because they use TA
I sense many will argue against your opinion as they are heavily invested in TA.98% traders either lose all or don't make money because they use TA
I sense many will argue against your opinion as they are heavily invested in TA.
I concur and also trade using fundamentals although I did manage to make money using TA just not as much as I make now. Fundamental traders are rare in this forum and in fact I am fairly confident in stating you and I are probably the only ones that trade this way without any TA. I am in favour of a dedicated thread (locked down of course to keep the trolls out)All good because this is the truth.
A lot of retail traders have frequent small wins using TA and then they get one or two big losses which will take away all their hard earned profits eventually.
TA is based on past info and does not incorporate upcoming info. So It may appear work only when there is no news.
I think most traders could happily lose using TA FA or SA. I think the whole 'one works one dont' thing is just another distraction.
For me, the difference between TA and FA is TA has a greater emphasis on probability. You don't know if any given setup is going to work so you have to take each one. The FA approach is more clear cut where the information gives a clear signal. The outcome is you can avoid the losses that's inevitable when trading probability. This has made the biggest difference to my trading results and I am more profitable. You also get larger wins
Technical + fundamental always. No other way.... as another way leads only to losses
it's a working system and you can't just throw away its part.
Of course, people do it , but...
I'd even say that a trader doesn't need to be a professional fundamental analyst , but at least he should be aware of the main upcoming events on the forex market
I got it after I nearly lost 305 bucks in a careless trade !!!