Now we are debating the experience and intelligence of the people voting, not just here but in general it seems. How in a democracy do you even think that each vote is different, young, old, educated, uneducated, worldly wise and just plain stupid all count.
As I have mentioned already, if Remain had won would this be the debate now, or would it be the people have spoken. As for any suggestions that if you can join the EU with a simple majority then you need a much bigger one to get out, well the people who suggest that are in the stupid camp to me but guess what they collectively had their chance and it has passed.
How can it ever be a democracy unless the will of the people is respected. There was plenty of notice, more than enough debate and 30+ million people were bothered enough to show their feelings on the subject.
Move forward not backwards.
Does sturgeon have a legal right to negotiate directly with the EU on behalf of Scotland? They have some devolved power but not enough to be able to just say after their own failed referendum that she is just doing it.
Quotas.As well as debating experience and intelligence I would add lies and deceitful facts and stats.
I notice no one bothers to talk about how we are going to get migrant numbers down anymore or how we are going to meet the expectations that were raised.
Any ideas?
Even when we invoke article 50, are are only out after 2 years so she might have to wait a whileFrom Cataluña's independence noises Brussels will not talk with them because it is part of EU's rules only to deal with the central government of the countries involved, in our case Madrid and the UK's London.
It makes sense not to have anything to do with internal strife, otherwise it would be involved in all sorts of trouble--and not, just, the UK.
The UK has not left the EU. So far, she is not going to deliver the notification to
Brussels until October, so, as far as Europe is concerned, you are, still, arguing amongst yourselves, stock market and currency turmoil apart.
Well you can and parliament must debate it. With the vast majority of MPs fervently remain what will they sacrifice? Their personal conviction (and perceived responsibility to do the best for the country) or the marginal will of the people.
I'm not trying to make an argument for trying to get remain by the back door, just pointing up the constitutional dilemma. Referenda don't fit with our representational democracy model.
As well as debating experience and intelligence I would add lies and deceitful facts and stats.
I notice no one bothers to talk about how we are going to get migrant numbers down anymore or how we are going to meet the expectations that were raised.
Any ideas?
As well as debating experience and intelligence I would add lies and deceitful facts and stats.
I notice no one bothers to talk about how we are going to get migrant numbers down anymore or how we are going to meet the expectations that were raised.
Any ideas?
As well as debating experience and intelligence I would add lies and deceitful facts and stats.
I notice no one bothers to talk about how we are going to get migrant numbers down anymore or how we are going to meet the expectations that were raised.
Any ideas?
One thing that is not unique in the UK is voting on correct facts or promises.
Dodgy dossiers, free university, prosperity for all etc. What constitutes canvassing in the UK and many other democracies is campaign wishes masquerading as promises.
I also have not see war break out in Europe yet or Russia marching in to Latvia. What I have seen is a lot of miffed European politicians and members of the EU lining up to mete out some form of retribution to the UK for defying their wishes.
The date of leaving has not been decided how do you expect it all to be resolved in a couple of days. The process has begun and it will be worked out and the end result will be a lot of compromise and in many cases and the most important is business as usual. Anything less will be the death knell for the EU. They do seem to enjoy shooting their toes off though.
guys ......we are ignoring the real issues here .....
are we going to be allowed to still enter the Eurovision song contest ?
One thing that is not unique in the UK is voting on correct facts or promises.
Dodgy dossiers, free university, prosperity for all etc. What constitutes canvassing in the UK and many other democracies is campaign wishes masquerading as promises.
I also have not see war break out in Europe yet or Russia marching in to Latvia. What I have seen is a lot of miffed European politicians and members of the EU lining up to mete out some form of retribution to the UK for defying their wishes.
The date of leaving has not been decided how do you expect it all to be resolved in a couple of days. The process has begun and it will be worked out and the end result will be a lot of compromise and in many cases and the most important is business as usual. Anything less will be the death knell for the EU. They do seem to enjoy shooting their toes off though.
Agree with the first paragraph.
Increase in the probability of war depends on which other countries brake away and how much support the far right parties can muster.
The other stuff is valid. There has been a toning down on the migrant rhetoric and statements clarifying numbers will not come down but simply that a point scoring mechanism implemented.
This pretty much confirms pressure on infrastructure will not ease but continue.
Remember the arguments about public transport, hospitals, school places, housing and wages?
guys ......we are ignoring the real issues here .....
are we going to be allowed to still enter the Eurovision song contest ?
(sorry - ive spent to much time in the depths this weekend after a long session in the weekend papers so needed to cheer myself up)
That is what some of the 10.6B saving is for.
Don't imagine that all issues will be solved in 5 mins.
That's just petulance on your behalf.
Agree with the first paragraph.
Increase in the probability of war depends on which other countries brake away and how much support the far right parties can muster.
The other stuff is valid. There has been a toning down on the migrant rhetoric and statements clarifying numbers will not come down but simply that a point scoring mechanism implemented.
This pretty much confirms pressure on infrastructure will not ease but continue.
Remember the arguments about public transport, hospitals, school places, housing and wages?
For the first time since joining the EU we have a road that alows us to reform migration. People coming here will have to have some kind of visa that will state the length of time and any recourse to public funds. Government can engage with business through audit process and implement criteria for business (relative being able, or not, to fill it domestically) .Agree with the first paragraph.
Increase in the probability of war depends on which other countries brake away and how much support the far right parties can muster.
The other stuff is valid. There has been a toning down on the migrant rhetoric and statements clarifying numbers will not come down but simply that a point scoring mechanism implemented.
This pretty much confirms pressure on infrastructure will not ease but continue.
Remember the arguments about public transport, hospitals, school places, housing and wages?