vanillaman
Member
- Messages
- 67
- Likes
- 6
Definitely In. Don't want to quit this rainy Island just yet because everything ran dry and a bunch of human rights haters can't deal with the new competitive globalizing world.
Definitely In. Don't want to quit this rainy Island just yet because everything ran dry and a bunch of human rights haters can't deal with the new competitive globalizing world.
Definitely In. Don't want to quit this rainy Island just yet because everything ran dry and a bunch of human rights haters can't deal with the new competitive globalizing world.
I don't see how stereotyping people is helpful whatever the aim.
I'd be surprised if someone doesn't challenge this in the courts.
This is the Iain Mansfield who wrote the article to compete for the IEA Brexit Prize for €100,000.
So whilst one may consider it to be an objective assessment, somehow I have great skepticism that the following Nigel Lawson would be trumpeting it about.
The Rt Hon. Lord Nigel Lawson, Chairman of the judging panel, said:
“'The British people have been promised a referendum on whether the UK should leave the European Union. There are few more important decisions than this. In advance of that decision the issues need to be fully debated, and an essential element of the debate will be an understanding of how the UK might conduct itself if and when we leave.
“Iain Mansfield's prize-winning entry provides an excellent starting point for this important debate, written with the experience of a serving member of the Diplomatic Corps with a solid background in trade policy.'”
http://www.iea.org.uk/in-the-media/...ield-named-winner-of-€100000-iea-brexit-prize
http://www.iea.org.uk/multimedia/video/iea-brexit-prize
Effectively it is a paid up article irrespective of whether it is an objective article or not.
It's purpose and design is primarily to make news and persuade the undecided. Well planned and executed initiative.
10 percent isn't much but could be the difference between job cuts or scaling back projects, and business as usual. If your projects or workforce is jeopardised, do you genuinely apply impartiality, or do you do what you can to protect it.
The IFS uses NIESR as an input to their forecasts. NIESR has been wrong before (an example is it backed the UK adopting the euro) and that would have been a fantastic mess.
Tory MP's are evenly split.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...on-each-side-of-eu-debate-cameron-eurosceptic
No list of names for Labour but it is reported that 90% of them are for remain.
No surprise there then....most failed Labour MP's go to Brussels don't they !
Alan Sugar man whom I love and respect since the Amstrad days.
Super watch. This guy has no interest as he declares; has already been knighted and is a Lord and is not looking for a job in the EU...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36380985
Yeah but there is also hundreds of millions of customers elsewhere in the world. The world doesn't start and end at UE's boarders. With all respect to Lord S, he without doubt has regular business with the EU and its in his companies interest to keep the status quo. He does sound genuine though albeit sugar coated in invested interest.
Twisting facts. There are good many more institutions and bodies supporting the EU than there are jobs available in the EU. The Brexit camp are really flogging this angle on anyone who says IN. As if they have been bought out by vested interest from the EU. This is simply not true.
From my pov, I see the Titanic just simply ignoring all advice and warnings on ice ahead and hurtling full steam ahead.
The more plausible reason is EU laws and legistlation more inclined to favour labour protection than free enterprising supporting businesses.
This is not something I support but accounting for Labour parties bias imo. Not about job prospects. You cheapen the debate by regurgitating nonsense.
But say it enough times it will stick and I see others who don't know much repeating this garbage they hear hounded about.
Dirty politics.
Bad CV. Very bad.:cheesy:
More cherry picking.
Sugar failed to mention that the UK share of trade with EU is declining year on year and that the EU is on a par with Antarctica in terms of lowest continental growth rate.
The EU doesn't work.
Mandy was twice fired as a minister and ended up as a blair/ brown crony sent to the EU as trade envoy or something.
Unelectable Kinnock eventually gave up trying to convince us that he was fit for power, instead he re-invented himself as a commissioner in the EU.
I don't make it up....it's all true.
Two swallows don't make a summer.
That all chestnut again.