What if Parliament votes to stay in ?
Superb debate in Parliament today. I thought Kenneth Clarke was brilliant.
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/natio...rexit-91aa1730-7e05-4379-8d71-39d489c7568c-ds
So I know this is going to be a surprise to you lot but I am looking at buying euro.
Interesting... :whistling
What's the trigger? Draghi supporting the banks
Supporting the banks was always a given. Their bail-in policy that was introduced in Jan still shows their commitment to saving banks. They want to keep the euro low because a stronger currency will hinder their recovery. Out of the top 5 biggest economies, 4 are showing a steady recovery with employment growth and wage growth in skilled and unskilled labour. Orders have been rising alongside consumer and business confidence . The only one of the 5 that breaks the trend is Italy although when compared over time, 2016 hasn't been the worst year although it brings risk into my plan.
Draghi met expectations with an extension but there was some confusion about it's interpretation. At least 3 news correspondents asked about tapering and Draghi said its not even been discussed! His language was harsh on the risks yet contradicting the little tit bits of info like recovery has been continuing, no immediate risks, repeatedly highlighted that the severe end of QE was just an option. The former head of Germany's central bank thinks they will halt it soon and he expects rates to start climbing by next September. in context to currency valuation well its at bargain prices considering the potential for this all to be priced in.
Now mix in the USA which is recovering and will have a growing demand for EU goods. Further mix in what looks like higher oil prices. China is showing signs of recovery and as all these interconnected relationships pickup, so is the EU (at least from these lows).
So yes i am seeing an opportunity develop for sure.
Infrastructure projects cost money and not many have surplus or a debt to gdp ratio that isn't knocking on the door marked 100%. What needs to happen is the wage gap needs to get fixed to give people more money to spend. All the rich do is shift wealth outside the economy.
The global recovery is starting to take shape. I don't seen any data that suggests its getting any worse but there are signs of recovery. You only need to look at commodities to see the shoots. China sells to the world and China is picking up in manufacturing.
I was not including the ukWage growth is not happening.
We have a problem with productivity and I would add other countries to that list. We are more likely to see automation and higher unemployment.
Without raising taxation debt can not be paid back. Reducing taxation to corporates and well off is just daft policy imo, considering levels of budget defecits and debt we and the West have.
I was not including the uk
The wage gap won't be reduced as long as there will be a working wage, it just puts more people onto the same level of wage gap and provides less incentive for workers to try and move away from it.
How do you envisage reducing the wage gap?
What would you suggest?
I think that governments will have some difficult decision making to make regarding social policies in the future. The pace of technical innovation and growth in human population is an interesting friction point to tackle.
I don't think we have enough data yet to be able to work on a long term solution. Ideas that are implemented now are young in their formation, there are no easy answers.