Please also take into account the result at Darwinex is standardized as Var 6.5%. Or simply word, similar max DD of Darwinex is 6.5%. While the5ers is 4%.
The above result might be a little bit unfair with the5ers. But, as a reference, it's good.
Their name is 5%. So, 95% failed can be understandable. ^^
to make more comparisons, let’s do some maths
FTMO, 3x 80k challenge run concurrently, funded for 240k with -10% tolerance with 70% payout
Darwinex, 15% perf fees with VaR, would require no less than $1,725,000 AuM to stand the comparison
now let’s view it from another angle, versus DarwinIA
to make it match, it would roughly need to win the 2nd place of DarwinIA, allowing 300k AuM
but to get max capital for the 2nd DarwinIA ranking nowadays requires 8571 € of deposits, then is more than 5 times the fees to pass 5 x 3 80k FTMO challenges...
at the end of the day, the DarwinIA prize is allocated for 6 months only while the time duration is unlimited with FTMO. It just has the advantage that if you fail you’ll lose only part of your capital, not all. But if you’re a failure, well, it doesn’t change the fact you’re a failure overall. Should you think about your odds as a loser or the incentive in case of success ?
I guess these competitors should even invite Darwinex to be more generous by revising some parameters