soccer_daemon said:
Hi 7th,
I think I am not the only one who feels that my "timing" on this inevitable Short is
a long way off. In fact mine went back to Thu last week, which is one whole
trading week .... 8-(.
I suspect your system would have sensed the shift in the timing of the short call
since some time last week & continue to do so coming into this week ? This
is an important lesson on the "timing" aspect and hopefully u can share some
insights in how it relates to tcds etc.
Thanks
SD
Hello SD,
Do you see the Outlook Trade profile target and its associated signal and its stated time-frame for when that trade would be initiated and when it normally terminates each month? (see first post in this thread) All that happened here, is that a Swing Trade profile in opposition to the Outlook Trade profile was initiated near the end of the month and about 182 pips away from the Outlook Trade profile target.
So, you get an Outlook Trade profile fighting against the Swing Trade profile near the end of the month and this time, the Outlook won the battle. So, I’m happy either way but would rather have seen this Swing Trade profile turn towards its target this week in stead of next week because that forces me into a longer hold period and I don’t like long hold periods that go outside the range of the profile’s time-frame.
If I’m in a Day Trade profile, then I don’t mind holding for 24hrs. If I’m in a Swing Trade profile, then I don’t mind holding for 5 trading days. And, if I’m in an Outlook Trade profile, then I don’t mind holding for 22 trading days which is one full month. Every profile has its “Time” and “Place” in this system and when a larger (BIGGER) signal runs up against a smaller signal, then the differential between the two profiles becomes the total (absolutely value) of the risk that I take.
Now, four (4) things to keep in mind:
1) It will be really, really difficult for those who don’t even know what a TCD is to fully understand what’s going on. For those that don’t know what a TCD is or means, you will know between now and somewhere around May 1st, 2006 (+/- a couple days).
2) Go back and review the Dashboard’s posted to date in this thread and look at the results of all the Swing Trade Profiles when it was against the Outlook Trade Profile. That will help you understand the risk taken on this particular trade.
3) A tradable instrument reaches new trading levels in one of two (2) ways and only one of two (2) ways.
4) You have to define what a “trade” means to you and realize the potential boundary layer for that trade.
Numbers 2 and 3 above are pretty self explanatory, so I’ll conclude with numbers 3 and 4 before I head out to the airport today.
Any honest look at the historical data of this particular pair from a technical standpoint using the weekly bar of data for the past 7 years will reveal that this week has entered a technical anomaly. No one who pays attention to EURUSD market data can read the data over the years and concluded that this week is somehow “normative” or behaviorally congruent with the historical norms. A few times a year, you can expect these types of news driven anomalies to
line up seemingly perfectly for the label of “trend” in the minds of trend seekers.
Go back and look at the data for every single week dating back to 12/27/04, as just a small example of what the norm is on a weekly basis for the EURUSD. What do you see? What you see is the movement of price from week-to-week that accompanies a routine cyclical nature between the previous week’s high and the current week’s low. That’s a fact that history shows simply by analyzing the data. You will see this fact being returned year after year after year.
Go back and take a look at the period from 8/30/04 through 11/29/04. What do you see? You see a 14 week bull market. But, are all bull markets the same? To the un-initiated they are. The reality is that there are always two ways in which a pair will get to a new trading level. It will either get there under normative bull/bear market price behavior, or anomalistic bull/bear market behavior. A simple honest look at the weekly data over the many years of existence in the eurusd using the primary tool of the TCD reveals clearly what normative and anomalistic means.
In normative bull/bear markets (using TCDs) you clearly have cyclical price behavior between the weekly previous high and the weekly current low that clearly warrant a
Swing Trade coming off of a week in the
opposite direction. In anomalistic bull/bear markets (using TCDs) you clearly have
non-cyclical price behavior between the weekly previous high and the weekly current low. Simple.
Now, review the past two weeks price behavior against the true historical nature of weekly EURUSD data using TCDs. What do you see? You clearly anomalistic non-normative price behavior between last week’s high/low and this week’s high/low. Again, simple.
Now, that only leaves the question of what caused it and that answer is equally as simple using 20/20 hindsight, of course. One word: News. How do you know for sure? Two (2) things stand out as being crystal clear to those who understand and use TCDs:
A) Go review this week’s daily TCD action within last week’s AND this week’s TCD action. What do you see?
On every single trading day this week, you see a strong attempt in the pair to (and this is very important) return to the Weekly TCD Shor. Look at a 1 hour chart from Sunday through Today and you will clearly see this. Why is this important? It shows the underlying normative tendency of the TCD to always want to seek its normal range. So, all throughout the week, you had the EURUSD trying hard to get back inline with its own historical and natural tendency.
B) Upon each attempt to return to its normal historical tendency (normative behavior) there was a news vector in opposition and directly inline with the Outlook Trade profile – almost as if by design. I have some thoughts on why this happens, but I don’t discuss them publicly as I expect them to be a part of the system’s design in the future.
So, on every day this week with the possible exception of 4/25/06, the sell-off was initiated and then halted on anticipation of news, or flat out reversed on the anti-USD/pro-EUR news. That sums up what happened this week.
Why don’t you see me panicking and overly concerned with this trade? That’s simple, too. It is because I understand what my definition of a “trade” looks like. The “trade” was defined back on Sunday/Monday of this week as a Swing Trade. By definition then, that automatically means higher potential profit, higher potential draw-down, higher potential risk due to higher market exposure to possible adverse news pushing the trade into an anomalistic short-term phase. So, because I understand the nature of the trade I have accepted and the potential dynamics of such a trade and everything that has happened to date fits within the possible realm of expected outcomes that I am comfortable with – I have no need to panic and many have demonstrated already this week.
However, my calmness is mostly due to the Monthly Short TCD that will get underway on May 1st, 2006 and because when I study the history of the EURUSD, I see that these anomalistic new price level moves are typically broken sooner, rather than later. Remember, others are looking at trends – I’m looking at TCDs. Eventually, if you trade long enough you will run into these anomalistic fluky news driven phases where “trends” look more real than they are.
The most dominant (by far) form of price movement in the currency market is the TCD, not the trend. The “Timing” of this particular trade gets amplified and morphed whenever it runs into fluky inline news that pushes an anomalistic event in the Weekly bar – which is a much bigger bar than the routine Daily bar that I always trade. If this had been on Outlook Trade, then I would expect such fluky behavior to generate an even BIGGER drawdown.
In either case: Day, Swing or Outlook profile – the return to normative behavior should match the Magnitude of the bar in which the trade was executed. So, a Swing return to normative will be bigger than a Day return to normative, etc.
It is all about the Bar being used and the size of the TCD that is or out of phase. Right now, (and this is also important) I’m inside a Weekly TCD out of phase, but it is running directly into a
new Monthly TCD that will be in phase.
So, I’m expected the Monthly Short TCD to more than make up for the out of phase Weekly Short TCD which could easily extend this trade out a couple more weeks to allow enough time for the Monthly Short TCD to initiate and mature. Below is a pic of the Monthly Real-Time TCD DH chart. It shows you why I am waiting patiently and why I can afford to wait patiently.
😉
Hope this helps, SD. Good questions!