JTrader
Guest
- Messages
- 5,741
- Likes
- 507
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Liberals like to say they are in the “reality-based” community, and not living in a “faith-based” or Neocon delusion.
But many liberals form their belief about what happened on 9/11 based on faith . . .
* Faith that Bush isn’t smart enough to have pulled off so large an act of treason
* Faith that our government wouldn’t murder thousands of its own citizens for political gain
* Faith that they have the basic information about what really happened that day
* Faith that scientists and military experts verify the official explanation for 9/11
..........
thats more like it.
a set of individuals who are most likely to know what they are talking about, and making assessments from their professional standpoint, rather than some shock-jocks.
I am more inclined to read articles penned by senior military and intelligence types, who were once "on the inside" as it were.
EDIT: I still cant get my head round the need to demolish the buildings.
The fact of flying those planes is sufficient to manipulate people to accept a war, and the link refers to people believing "allowing it to happen as pretext to war", which is much less technically demanding than actually wiring up buildings to collapse. (which is my standpoint all the way back in this thread)
Hmm that psychiatrist MD carol wolman posted a link to 9-11 mysteries video , but nothing there, she said thats the best factual one......?
this is it i think 911 Mysteries Part 1 - Demolitions (Full - 1ed.)
My wifes off to washington for a couple o weeks soon... so Ive asked her to see whats going on..... personally i wouldn't want to go anywhere near the sh1thole of corruption..
Hmm that psychiatrist MD carol wolman posted a link to 9-11 mysteries video , but nothing there, she said thats the best factual one......?
this is it i think 911 Mysteries Part 1 - Demolitions (Full - 1ed.)
My wifes off to washington for a couple o weeks soon... so Ive asked her to see whats going on..... personally i wouldn't want to go anywhere near the sh1thole of corruption..
EDIT: I still cant get my head round the need to demolish the buildings.
The fact of flying those planes is sufficient to manipulate people to accept a war, and the link refers to people believing "allowing it to happen as pretext to war", which is much less technically demanding than actually wiring up buildings to collapse. (which is my standpoint all the way back in this thread)
Wires in an age of wireless?
yes, exactly! you know what I mean - the logistics of it all.
suppose I should "pull" that phrase, as it may be misinterpreted.
I had a great weekend - a real blast.
good video;
1: those core columns at ground zero, seemingly sheared with neat 45deg cuts.
2: freefall collapse, and the physics of it all
3:didnt know that the Fire Dept professionals were mentioning blasts; that gives weight, since these are people who are trained to observe more accurately in pressure situations, so their views more valuable.
4: the security "upgrade" the weekend before Sep-11, and massive power-downs that switched off the CCTV cameras!
5: Towers insured for terrorism only a few months before! But, to be fair, how many buildings were covered for terrorism; was this insurance an isolated incident, or did many skyscrapers also have similar insurance.
yes, exactly! you know what I mean - the logistics of it all.
5: Towers insured for terrorism only a few months before! But, to be fair, how many buildings were covered for terrorism; was this insurance an isolated incident, or did many skyscrapers also have similar insurance?
yes, exactly! you know what I mean - the logistics of it all.
suppose I should "pull" that phrase, as it may be misinterpreted.
I had a great weekend - a real blast.
good video;
1: those core columns at ground zero, seemingly sheared with neat 45deg cuts.
2: freefall collapse, and the physics of it all
3:didnt know that the Fire Dept professionals were mentioning blasts; that gives weight, since these are people who are trained to observe more accurately in pressure situations, so their views more valuable.
4: the security "upgrade" the weekend before Sep-11, and massive power-downs that switched off the CCTV cameras!
5: Towers insured for terrorism only a few months before! But, to be fair, how many buildings were covered for terrorism; was this insurance an isolated incident, or did many skyscrapers also have similar insurance.
Just watching this video now and I have always been shocked by what I saw but these questions have always been at the back of my head just how can these structures collapse.
The more I look at these the more I'm convinced they were demolished.
Especially in comparrison to other high rise buildings that were burning for 24 hours plus and stood up.
Fancy the buildings being designed to withstand aeroplanes flying into them... ??? Didn't know that before. :-0
18. Was it just a coincidence that terrorists flying aircraft into skyscrapers test drill was planned on the same day as it really did happen???
19. How come if a terrorist hijacking test was being carried out no fighter pilots were even ready or called out in response to the test/real threat?
18. Was it just a coincidence that terrorists flying aircraft into skyscrapers test drill was planned on the same day as it really did happen???
19. How come if a terrorist hijacking test was being carried out no fighter pilots were even ready or called out in response to the test/real threat?
For those that believe that America is doing the right thing in iraq what about Dafur or somalia that has no government or rule of law for the last 18yrs what have they done?.The US will only operate in countries where there is a financial reward for them to control.
May I remind you all that when the civil war started in somalia the US went there and in less than
8hrs after their arrival 18 of their marine were killed and the next day they left,but in Iraq hundred of their men have die yet they still keep fighting.
As a muslim no individaul has the right to kill another human being for whatever reason,it was completely unislamic for the idiot that fly those plane into the tower and am very sure that they will get their reward in the day of judgement.
Welcome to Trade2win,
are you a forex trader, up this late?
4. Total building power down was at very short notice - 3 weeks considering number of big clients and computer system that's very harsh... Caused havoc with IT operations.
5. Legal case fought to have terrorism on insurance policy.
ADDENDUM 5b. Steiner buys 99 year lease for $50m and makes $7bn from insurance policy, 6 months prior to collapse after he fights the legal case to get terrorism cover on insurance policy... Nice work or just coincidence...
6. Asbestos covered fire resistent frames and a $1bn dollar clearance bill to bring building up to H&S standards?
7. Vacant floors due to lack of tennants?
8. Cost of maintaining an old building?
9. Dogs trained for explosive detection taken away couple of weeks before demolition?
10. Bulding designed to withstand aeroplane impact?
11. Gold bullions stored and removed prior to demolition?
12. Explosions and puff of smokes - squibs unique to building demolitions, seen coming out of building?
13. Building projectiles flying out of the building? One peace equivalent to weight of two Jumbos aeroplanes being blown out to an adjacent building. Fires don't blow metal away.
14. Damage to base of building and inexplicable explosions prior to building collapse?
15. How about the shuddering of cameras on another building just before buildings collapse?
16. How did everyone know WTC7 was going to come down 6 hours before it collapsed? Where did the fireman get their information to from?
17. Why were sprinkler test activated on this day?
18. Was it just a coincidence that terrorists flying aircraft into skyscrapers test drill was planned on the same day as it really did happen???
19. How come if a terrorist hijacking test was being carried out no fighter pilots were even ready or called out in response to the test/real threat?
20. Why did the BBC edit the words of Mr Steiners regarding pulling down WTC7 such as to totally change it's meaning to pulling out firefighters? Especially so as the building was empty and decission to vacate was done 6 hours before it went down. Crazy...
21. If buildings collapsed due to intense fire or imploded in rather than exploding out why were there was so much office paper and stationary all over New York?
The physics of it all - free fall of the collapse defies Newton's laws of motion. :-0
Gravity / Acceleration = 9.821 meters per second.
Buildings fall in just 10 seconds...