mpups
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,022
- Likes
- 144
insane video
To be fair Mike, that I agree with. Of course throw on some demo trades to get used to the platform but don't use it for pretending to actually trade. Games are just games and have no meaning. If there is money down, it becomes serious.
Think about how you play (if you do) a board game with friends or a games console, now imagine that every time you lost a life, you lost a grand, or, every time you landed on Mayfair (Monopoly), you had to pay the rent from your bank account.
Now think about how very different you would play these games.
Indeed they would be no longer games with your new rules and probably less enjoyable but that's me. Each to their own , eh ?
Indeed they would be no longer games with your new rules and probably less enjoyable but that's me. Each to their own , eh ?
It's all about losing money and coping. If one gets upset, go home. Trading is not for you. It's easy to accept wins, handling the losses however is where it's at. Otherwise you could be the one on the bridge staring into the abyss wondering what the f**k just happened.
But the research I've read shows that most people are naturally reacting badly in trading. Whether it's wrong views about probability and risk reward, over-leveraging, lack of knowledge of the market, chasing highs or doubling down, their natural instincts are off. So I think it would be the wrong approach for them to just keep trading live and losing.
Isn't jumping in, clueless, maybe even reckless, the first approach of most people anyway? Historically, that doesn't turn out well.
Historically, 99% of people lose whether they demo or not. This may seem terrible but it's not. Deductively, shops take money from the 99%. If one were to copy trade the shops, one would surely win.
People lose because they don't follow the real winners.
I'd also bet that if someone was to do the exact opposite trades of a loser, they'd still end up losing as well.
Possibly. But if you get out at the moment the loser is taken out, you would have won. But you are more of a hold until lose kinda guy. You are unhappy until you lose.
You are unhappy until you lose .
Do you become happy after a loss?
Possibly. But if you get out at the moment the loser is taken out, you would have won. But you are more of a hold until lose kinda guy. You are unhappy until you lose.
I don't hold until I lose
Isn't jumping in, clueless, maybe even reckless, the first approach of most people anyway? Historically, that doesn't turn out well.
It comes down to the question of whether you should learn a skill, e.g. swimming, by just being thrown into the water. For some activities, that might be the best thing. If the activity is simple enough that your instincts will direct you to perform the correct action, or safe enough that you can survive long enough to develop correct instincts, then go for it.
Good example to use IMHO is swimming. So you want to learn the theory of swimming - you could mimic a swimming stoke in the air in your living room "imagining" what it would be like. You go a step further and use arm bands in the pool, but once again you have a support in place, keeping you safe in the knowledge that you wont sink, but there comes a time when you have to take those armbands off and go for it.
What to do?
Have a go, but in the small pool, where you can stand up if needed. Trading alternative being real market small stakes. You then begin to realise that you are NOT testing if you can swim or not, you are testing if you can handling the emotions of being in the water for real. You are not testing if you can trade (we can all press a buy/sell button), we are testing how we cope with emotional responses put upon us when in the heat of the battle. We are testing ourselves.
Trading is like most things in life in terms of - its ok to be wrong, we have another go, another chance to learn etc.
Shadow boxing springs to mind - My mate wanted to be a boxer until he realised he didnt like getting punched in the face. Just wasted 6 months in front of a mirror "imagining" that he was taking the blows, or should I say "simming".
All the posts have in my opinion, now come full circle to prove that we are testing our emotion receptors, and this can not be done without a physical implication in place to provide an environment to test this.
Once tested we can evaluate where we stand, and how we plan to move forward.