Martinghoul
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,691
- Likes
- 277
I have absolutely no idea what you're saying here, Howard. However, you're certainly not addressing the point I made. It's not about ego, per se. My point is that success in one's chosen field, whether it be teaching, trading, engineering or anything else, is enough of an ego boost to professional people who have a healthy respect for themselves and for their chosen field. Such people wouldn't seek to massage their egos further by teaching. Does your daughter-in-law often decide to start a paid class to impart her student experience to other wannabe high-school teachers?There was a fad not long ago about egoless-whatever. Like most fads its proponents pushed it beyond its ability to be of benefit. Your concerns about ego as a motivator remind me of what doctors are taught. The only difference between medicine and poison is dose. With the right amount of ego there is concern for the customer as well as the teacher. The teacher cares about his reputation. An excessive amount of ego not only poisons the teacher, but poisons everyone with whom he is in contact.
Nobody here has concerns about your "pedagogy", Howard, whatever you might mean by that. The concern is that you DON'T have the qualifications necessary to teach a particular subject. It's as if your daughter-in-law applied for the high school principal's job right after graduating from kindergarten. In reality, I guess she has a degree or a couple, and that she worked as a regular teacher for at least several years before she considered herself qualified.Working with students is an enriching experience on many levels. It is difficult to put in words, even for professional teachers like my daughter-in-law who is now the prin\cipal of the high school that attracts the best and the brightest in her area. She cannot judge the content of my material, but she does not have the concerns about the pedagogy that many here profess.
Howard, if you love to teach, why don't you teach engineering? I am telling you that people can't benefit from what you know because you, in fact, know VERY LITTLE, if not NOTHING, about trading. I have said it time and time again, not to offend you, but as a simple statement of fact.Teaching may not be the most efficient way to accomplish my personal learning goals. I am not planning to teach as the most efficient way to make money. I expect to lose money at it. I am not planning to teach as the most efficient way to better learn my craft. I am planning to teach because I love it and I believe that others may benefit from what I know. Many who publicly post here do not agree. I am, however, encouraged by feedback that is not so public.
Howard, what is wrong with your mental faculties? Of course, methods of "returning" differ. Surely, it should be obvious. If I have never ever fired a firearm in my entire life, but have this burning desire to teach other people to shoot, do you think that would be a good idea? I understand you had mentor(s) when you started trading? Imagine if this mentor were someone who had no mkt experience but had a burning desire to teach? The point is that, irrespective of our desires, external reality imposes all sorts of constraints on our ability to do the things we feel we can do.The most disconcerting element of your post is to suggest that one person's method of returning is superior to another's. That idea is anathema to people like me. (Libertarians who conceal carry )
Howard, I am generally a patient person, hence my willingness to engage in a dialogue with you and my civility. However, there's a point where even I will run out of patience.Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Many here could learn a lot from you about civil discourse.