Finally a responsible reply.
Presumably you therefore regard the others as irresponsible? In what way exactly? Get a dictionary if you don't know the meaning of the word (you clearly don't).
I knew there was a chance someone would rise to the occasion. I guessed you would be among them. I did not guess you would be first.
There was a fad not long ago about egoless-whatever. Like most fads its proponents pushed it beyond its ability to be of benefit. Your concerns about ego as a motivator remind me of what doctors are taught.
The only difference between medicine and poison is dose. With the right amount of ego there is concern for the customer as well as the teacher. The teacher cares about his reputation. An excessive amount of ego not only poisons the teacher, but poisons everyone with whom he is in contact.
WTF is this drivel? I note that you don't actually refute MG's point - you have a ridiculous ego that is harming you now and will undoubtedly harm anyone unlucky enough to become one of your students.
Working with students is an enriching experience on many levels. It is difficult to put in words, even for professional teachers like my daughter-in-law who is now the principal of the high school that attracts the best and the brightest in her area. She cannot judge the content of my material, but she does not have the concerns about the pedagogy that many here profess.
Your daughter-in-law can't assess the content of your drivel. But at least one close relative is relaxed about your style of teaching. Marvellous, I'm totally convinced now.
Teaching may not be the most efficient way to accomplish my personal learning goals.
I am not planning to teach as the most efficient way to make money. I expect to lose money at it.
Sorry, I need to do that again:
I am not planning to teach as the most efficient way to better learn my craft. I am planning to teach because I love it and I believe that others may benefit from what I know. Many who publicly post here do not agree. I am, however, encouraged by feedback that is not so public.
I bet it's not so public . Don't worry, we won't require proof of it. You might look at the number of reps posts attacking you have received on this thread. That is public.
The most disconcerting element of your post is to suggest that one person's method of returning is superior to another's. That idea is anathema to people like me. (Libertarians who conceal carry
)
Have you got something to do with carrying a concealed gun? Wow, nobody would ever have guessed.
I did my duty to my progeny by paying for their undergraduate education so that they would get out of school with no debt. They also worked part time to earn expense money. In return I promised to live long enough to become a burden to them. :smart: They are more successful than I financially and have no need for my resources except my time to spend with my grandchildren.
More irrelevant drivel.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Many here could learn a lot from you about civil discourse.
This is a favourite theme of yours Little Howie. However, swearing is not the only way to have uncivil discourse. You ignore inconvenient points, you make fantastical and nonsensical claims in debates, and you actually lie about what your opponents post.
You are one of the least civil and most passive-aggressive posters on this site.