Agree up to a point, especially the bit about the technical schools and lack of full implementation. The 1944 Education Act stipulated a tripartitie system, but in many places, only 2 parts were implemented: grammars and Sec Mods.
I passed the 11 plus and got a place in what was perceived to be a good grammar school.
My older sister had had a bad 11 plus due to illness and had gone to a technical school where we used to live, but we moved when she was about 14, and she ended up at a Sec Mod as there were no technical schools where we moved to. As it happened, it wasn't a bad Sec Mod.
This is another point: not all Sec Mods were bad, but equally, not all grammar schools were particularly good. I'd say that both mine and my wife's were actually only "moderate", in objective terms, although mine did in effect help me move out of the "working class" into the "middle class" (my wife was already middle class - she married beneath her
).
My kids went to different, but quite good local comprehensives, and in certain ways, got a better education than I did, although not in all respects. They both actually got better A levels than I did, and both did better in their higher education than I did.
Yes, would be great to have less rigid systems, but rigidity has a way of creeping in I'm afraid. Goes with the territory. Along with authoritarianism.
Yeah it's great, CallMeDave wants to bring in schools under local parents' control, but Tories (all Tories) will only want local schools under parents' control so long as they conform to some image of schools that Tory Central Office deems appropriate. Remember, it was the Tories who brought in the National Curriculum. Did someone mention rigidity?