dbphoenix
Guest Author
- Messages
- 6,954
- Likes
- 1,266
Hot heads = civil war.........again
Fanning the flames of divisiveness appears to be the default position. Keep people afraid and the world is your oyster.
Hot heads = civil war.........again
Fanning the flames of divisiveness appears to be the default position. Keep people afraid and the world is your oyster.
Yes, he does. But then so apparently do many other world leaders, West and East. Granted many of them are incompetent, but there is value in keeping the public off-balance. And the more off-balance, the better.
New politics at play. Not split along traditional party lines. Anything could happen !
Actually, it's more than just politics. We are in revolution territory, the evidence is clearly visible.
Brexit
Trump
Catalonia
Yes, he does. But then so apparently do many other world leaders, West and East. Granted many of them are incompetent, but there is value in keeping the public off-balance. And the more off-balance, the better.
I really can't see what's better about keeping the public off balance except to trick them.
That's the point. "Trickle-down economics" is an excellent example.
Aha ! So who put the trick in trickle ?
The wicked capitalists?
The self righteousness and "intellectual" arrogance of the left who always know better than the masses they purport to represent continues to beggar belief.
Well said.
Youth knows everything, except experience.
Youth knows enthusiasm without judgement.
Aha ! So who put the trick in trickle ?
The wicked capitalists?
The self righteousness and "intellectual" arrogance of the left who always know better than the masses they purport to represent continues to beggar belief.
The self-righteousness and "intellectual" arrogance of the right who always know better than the masses they purport to represent also continues to beggar belief.
So equally applicable to the left its become a cliche that the left repeat and repeat. At least as far as the British socialist movement is concerned. As you'll appreciate, this is inherently a deal further left than the US left and has a strong class element.
Not surprising, given how the working class has been treated over the past two hundred years or so.
Not that any of this has anything to do with the "best PM" in modern times.
Who was the last competent PM (or Minister even) we've had in the UK?
I actually found some survey results on Wiki on this -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Prime_Ministers_of_the_United_Kingdom
The most recent survey was October 2016, involving 82 academics specialising in post-1945 British history and politics. Seems they had to all the 20th-century British PM's in terms of their success and the key characteristics of successful PMs.
They put Attlee at the top. Well, OK, he headed the implementation of the NHS. But then there's Thatcher, then Blair! While even the useless Gordon Brown gets in ahead of Cameron!
1 Clement Attlee 1945–1951 Labour
2 Margaret Thatcher 1979–1990 Conservative
3 Tony Blair 1997–2007 Labour
4 Harold Macmillan 1957–1963 Conservative
5 Harold Wilson 1964–1970, 1974–1976 Labour
6 John Major 1990–1997 Conservative
7 Sir Winston Churchill (1940–1945), 1951–1955 Conservative
8 James Callaghan 1976–1979 Labour
9 Edward Heath 1970–1974 Conservative
10 Gordon Brown 2007–2010 Labour
11 David Cameron 2010–2016 Conservative
12 Sir Alec Douglas-Home 1963–1964 Conservative
13 Sir Anthony Eden 1955–1957 Conservative
What a bunch!